Roast mode 🔥

A growth junkie portfolio pretending to be diversified while double dipping tech six different ways

Report created on Jan 23, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This setup is basically one big S&P 500 bet with a pile of tech-flavored sprinkles on top. Seventy percent in a broad US index is solid grown-up behavior; then the other 30% says “YOLO tech and war machines.” The problem is overlap: large-cap growth, tech, semis, and S&P 500 all hold a lot of the same mega names. That’s like buying four tickets to the same concert and calling it variety. If simplicity is the goal, this could be streamlined into fewer funds while keeping roughly the same exposure but with cleaner structure and easier risk control.

Growth Info

CAGR of 18.78% is spicy. If someone had dropped 10k into this historical mix, they’d be looking at around 44k now instead of maybe 30k in a more boring benchmark that grew closer to ~12% a year. But that max drawdown of -34.41% is a reminder this thing doesn’t just go up; it can punch you in the face too. Max drawdown is just “how bad the worst fall was.” Past returns are like old glory days stories: fun, useful context, but not a contract with the future.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulation is basically running a thousand alternate-universe market histories to see how things might play out. Here, even the 5th percentile ends at +266.7%, and the median at +1,647.8% is full “line goes up” fantasy land. That 25.82% annualized from all simulations screams “assumes a lot of the good times keep rolling.” Reality check: models lean heavily on past volatility and returns, which are like yesterday’s weather — helpful, not psychic. Sensible use here: see that outcomes are wide and noisy, so plan for the ugly tail, not just the hero scenario.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

One hundred percent stocks and zero percent everything else is a clear “I don’t believe in brakes” statement. No bonds, no cash buffer, no diversifiers — just pure equity roller coaster. For a growth profile, that’s not insane, but it is unforgiving if a multi-year bear market shows up. Stocks are long-term wealth engines, sure, but they’re also short-term chaos machines. If someone needs money in the next 5–10 years, having only stocks is like scheduling a vacation that fully depends on perfect weather. Even a small slice of lower-volatility assets could help smooth the emotional ride.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    41%
  • Industrials
    14%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%

Tech at 41% is full-on tech addiction, and the satellite ETFs (semis, tech, growth, ARK) just lean harder into it. Industrials at 14% is basically “defense and planes,” so this is heavily tied to innovation, defense, and growth narratives. Sectors like utilities, real estate, and basic materials are just background extras. When tech and growth are hot, this will look genius; when they’re not, it will feel like punishment. Sector concentration means one narrative dominates results. Trimming the single-theme ETFs or shifting some weight to more balanced exposures would keep less of your fate tied to whether chips and SaaS stay in fashion.

Regions Info

  • North America
    98%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Europe Developed
    1%

Ninety-eight percent North America screams “America or bust apparently,” with Europe and Asia developed tossed in as cosmetic garnish. The rest of the planet is essentially a rumor here. That’s fine as long as the US stays the main growth engine and innovation hub, but it’s also a huge single-country bet masked as diversification. Global markets don’t move in perfect sync, so some non-US exposure can act like having more than one engine on the plane. Adding even a small but intentional slice of broader international exposure would reduce the “US is everything forever” assumption baked into this setup.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    43%
  • Large-cap
    36%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    3%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market cap mix is actually one of the least chaotic parts: 43% mega, 36% big, 17% mid, and a token sprinkling of small and micro. So the portfolio is basically cosplaying as the US large-cap market with a tiny “I like risk” badge via smaller names. That’s not terrible, but it does mean the portfolio’s fate is tied to the mega-cap giants doing the heavy lifting. When those leaders stall, everything feels sluggish. If someone genuinely wants more growth juice (and can stomach pain), they’d usually need a more deliberate mid/small shift instead of the current “accidental rounding error” allocation.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Those highly correlated positions — S&P 500, large-cap growth, and tech — are basically three slightly different camera angles of the same movie. Correlation just means they move together, especially when things get ugly. Owning multiple funds that crash at the same time doesn’t spread risk; it just spreads line items. In a downturn, they’re likely to drop as one loud, synchronized chorus. Streamlining here could mean picking fewer overlapping funds and then, if desired, using the freed-up space for something that actually dances to a different beat instead of cloning the same exposure over and over.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk–return angle, this is like someone found a pretty decent spot on the Efficient Frontier and then taped extra tech stickers on it. Efficient Frontier just means “best return for a given level of risk,” not magic free-return land. Here, risk is already high, and a bunch of extra correlated growth/tech layers don’t buy much extra diversification, just more drama. The historic and simulated returns look amazing, but they’re heavily tied to a tech-obsessed decade. A more efficient version would simplify the overlapping US large-cap bets and use the freed space to add assets that don’t all panic together.

Dividends Info

  • ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF 0.20%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.88%

A portfolio yield of 0.88% is “we’re here for growth, not for income” territory. That’s fine if the goal is long-term compounding and not funding rent. But anyone dreaming of living off this in the near term would quickly realize it’s more of a growth rocket than a cash-flow machine. Dividends are just companies sharing profits with you in cash; here, most of the payoff is expected to come from price moves, not checks in the account. If income ever becomes a real goal, this setup would need an overhaul toward more stable, higher-yield holdings.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF 0.75%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.40%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.12%

Total TER of 0.12% is impressively low, especially considering ARK is lugging around a 0.75% fee like an expensive handbag. “Fees are under control — you must have clicked the right ETF by accident” fits here. Most of the dollars are in dirt-cheap core funds, while the pricey stuff is kept small. That’s actually smart, whether intentional or not. Still, paying 0.75% for yet another tech-y, innovation-y slice on top of a tech-heavy base is questionable. Dropping or shrinking the highest-cost, most overlapped positions would clean the structure and slightly improve long-term net returns without any heroics.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey