A broadly diversified equity heavy portfolio with strong growth tilt and low costs for long term wealth building

Report created on Aug 11, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is almost entirely in stocks, split across four broad ETFs, with no bonds or alternatives. Compared with a typical “balanced” benchmark, which often holds a sizeable bond slice, this setup leans clearly growth‑oriented even though the risk score is mid‑range. The blend of total market, growth, international, and dividend ETFs gives good coverage but also some overlap, especially between the total US market and the US large‑cap growth fund. That overlap is normal, but it means risk and returns are driven mostly by the same big companies. A periodic review of how much each holding really adds to diversification can help keep the structure intentional and aligned with comfort around volatility.

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 14.7% is very strong; CAGR is basically the “average yearly speed” of growth, smoothing out the bumps. A -33.7% max drawdown shows it can drop sharply during market stress, which is typical for an equity‑heavy mix and roughly in line with broad stock benchmarks during major selloffs. The fact that 90% of returns came from only 35 days highlights how missing a few big up days can severely impact results. While this history is impressive, it’s still just history, not a guarantee. Staying invested through swings and avoiding panic moves is key to capturing those occasional, powerful rebound days.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 “what if” simulations by shuffling historical returns, points to a wide range of possible outcomes. Think of Monte Carlo like re‑rolling the last decade over and over to see many plausible futures, not just one. The median scenario ending near 478% of the starting value is appealing, but the 5th percentile at about 90% shows that, in rougher paths, values can stagnate or dip over a full horizon. Almost all simulations were positive and the average simulated return stays high, but these are still just models based on the past. Using these results as guardrails, not promises, can help set realistic expectations around both upside and downside.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

Asset‑class exposure is almost pure equity at 99%, with just a token 1% in cash. Compared with many balanced portfolios that combine stocks and bonds, this structure is more aggressive and more sensitive to market cycles. The benefit is higher long‑term growth potential, especially over multi‑decade horizons, and this aligns well with the strong backtested performance. The trade‑off is larger swings in account value and deeper drawdowns when markets drop. For someone wanting smoother rides or near‑term withdrawals, gradually folding in some stabilizing assets could be useful. For someone prioritizing long‑run growth and able to ride out volatility, keeping the equity focus but reviewing it periodically against life milestones and cash‑flow needs can work well.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    30%
  • Financials
    13%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is well spread across technology, financials, consumer sectors, healthcare, and others, with technology clearly leading at about 30%. This tech tilt is common in modern equity portfolios and aligns with major indices, which is a positive sign that the mix is not wildly out of line with the market. However, tech‑heavy allocations can be more sensitive to interest rate shifts and changes in growth expectations, which may amplify ups and downs. The presence of dividend and value‑oriented names helps balance that somewhat. Checking once in a while whether the tech share has crept higher due to strong performance, and deciding if that bias is truly intentional, can keep risk from drifting beyond comfort levels.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, about 81% is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, Asia, and a small slice in emerging regions. This home bias toward the US is very typical for American investors and has been rewarded over the last decade as US stocks outperformed many peers. The inclusion of a broad international ETF is a strong move that provides extra diversification and exposure to different economic cycles. However, global benchmarks usually allocate more outside the US, so foreign exposure here is still modest. Periodically deciding whether to keep this US‑centric stance or nudge closer to a more global split can help balance concentration risk with familiarity and confidence in domestic markets.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    41%
  • Large-cap
    33%
  • Mid-cap
    19%
  • Small-cap
    4%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market‑cap exposure leans heavily toward mega and large companies, with smaller companies making up only a modest slice. This is consistent with broad market indices, which naturally weight the biggest firms more, and it helps keep volatility in check relative to a small‑cap‑heavy strategy. Larger companies typically have more stable earnings and better access to capital, which can make downturns somewhat more manageable. On the flip side, smaller companies can sometimes offer higher growth over long periods, albeit with bumpier rides. This blend is well‑aligned with mainstream benchmarks, and it already delivers a reasonable small and mid‑cap component; occasional check‑ins can confirm whether that small‑company share still matches growth and risk preferences.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The US total market ETF and the US large‑cap growth ETF are highly correlated, meaning their prices tend to move in very similar ways. Correlation is a measure of how often things move together; when it’s high, those holdings behave like close cousins rather than independent players. That limits diversification benefits because, in a downturn driven by large US growth stocks, both will likely fall together. This isn’t inherently bad—tilting toward growth is a valid style choice—but it’s worth being aware that risk isn’t reduced as much as the number of line items might suggest. Reviewing whether both funds are needed for the desired style tilt could simplify the portfolio without changing its overall character much.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk‑return standpoint, the portfolio sits in a growth‑oriented spot that has historically delivered strong results for its level of volatility. The Efficient Frontier is a concept that maps combinations of existing holdings that give the “best bang for your buck” in terms of return per unit of risk. Here, because two US funds are highly correlated, shifting weights between them and the international and dividend components could potentially move the mix closer to that efficiency line without changing the building blocks. Efficiency doesn’t mean it’s the perfect portfolio for every goal, just that it makes the most of the chosen ingredients. Periodic rebalancing helps maintain this balance as markets move.

Dividends Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.65%

The overall yield of about 1.65% comes from a mix of a high‑yield dividend ETF and lower‑yield growth and broad‑market funds. Dividend yield is simply the yearly cash paid out as a percentage of the investment value, useful for those who like a bit of income while still staying invested. The dedicated dividend ETF at roughly 3.8% adds a nice income layer and can make total returns feel more tangible during sideways markets. Growth‑oriented and broad index funds pay less but often aim for price appreciation. This blend is a solid middle ground between income and growth; deciding whether income needs are met can guide future tweaks in the dividend versus growth balance.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

The total expense ratio (TER) of roughly 0.04% is impressively low. TER is the annual fee taken by the funds to manage your money, and at these levels it’s like paying a few dollars a year per $10,000 invested—almost negligible. Compared to many actively managed products charging 0.5%–1% or more, this is a big structural advantage, leaving more of the return in your pocket. Over decades, even tiny fee differences compound meaningfully. This setup is strongly aligned with best practices in low‑cost index investing. Keeping the focus on simple, inexpensive funds and being cautious about adding higher‑fee products without a very clear purpose supports better long‑term outcomes.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey