A broadly diversified low cost portfolio with strong growth focus and modest cash for stability

Report created on Nov 4, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

5/5
Highly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is built from four broad index ETFs, with about 70% in US stocks, 20% in international stocks, and 10% in ultra‑short US Treasuries. This kind of “core index” mix is simple, transparent, and lines up closely with common balanced growth approaches, though you’re slightly heavier in stocks than many balanced benchmarks that include more bonds. That tilt can help long‑term growth but will also make the ride bumpier in bad markets. One practical next step could be deciding whether the 10% cash‑like holding fits your emergency‑cash needs or if some of it should sit in a separate safety bucket instead.

Growth Info

Using a hypothetical 10,000 dollars starting amount, a 15% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) would have grown to roughly 40,000 dollars over ten years. CAGR is like your average yearly “speed” over the whole trip, smoothing out all the bumps. This pace is stronger than long‑term historical stock market averages and points to a meaningful growth tilt. However, the max drawdown of about ‑24% shows that the portfolio can still drop sharply during tough markets. Since past performance can’t predict future results, it helps to treat this history as a rough weather map, not a guarantee, when planning next steps.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results show a wide spread of possible futures: the median simulation ending around 415% of starting value, while the 5th percentile still ends slightly positive at about 114%. Monte Carlo simulations work by “re‑rolling” many random paths based on past returns and volatility, a bit like running thousands of alternate timelines. The annualized simulated return of about 13% is optimistic but broadly consistent with the strong historical record. Because simulations lean heavily on the past, they can understate new risks or regime changes. A practical move is to treat the optimistic midrange as a best‑case planning scenario and stress‑test your comfort with outcomes closer to the lower tail.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    89%
  • Cash
    10%

The mix is roughly 89% stocks and 10% ultra‑short Treasuries, with effectively no traditional bond allocation. That makes the portfolio more growth‑oriented than many “balanced” templates that often keep 30–40% in longer‑term bonds. This stock‑heavy stance has powered strong returns in the recent decade but can mean larger swings when markets fall. The 10% cash‑like slice does help cushion short‑term dips, though it won’t provide the same long‑term yield or diversification as intermediate‑term bonds. One practical tweak could be deciding whether you want a bit more bond‑like ballast or if you’re comfortable riding out equity volatility for potentially higher long‑run growth.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    28%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is well spread: technology is the largest at 28%, with financials, consumer cyclicals, industrials, and communication services rounding out most of the rest. This looks very similar to broad market benchmarks, which is a strong sign of healthy diversification. A tech tilt has helped a lot in the past decade, but it can also make portfolios more sensitive to interest rate moves or growth slowdowns. Because you’re relying mostly on total‑market and S&P 500 funds, sector changes will naturally track the global economy. A useful habit is simply checking once or twice a year whether any sector has grown to a level that makes you personally uneasy.

Regions Info

  • North America
    71%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, there’s a clear home bias: about 71% in North America, with smaller slices in Europe, developed Asia, and tiny allocations to emerging markets and other regions. This lines up closely with many US‑focused benchmarks and has been a tailwind while US stocks outperformed. The trade‑off is higher reliance on one economic region and its currency. The 20% international slice still adds useful diversification because different regions can lead at different times. If you ever worry about “all‑eggs‑in‑one‑country” risk, nudging that international piece up slightly could provide more global balance while still keeping the US as the core driver.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    40%
  • Large-cap
    29%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • Small-cap
    3%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Most of the equity exposure is in mega and large companies, with moderate mid‑cap exposure and a small dose of small and micro caps. That pattern is very similar to global index benchmarks and helps keep risk manageable, since big, established companies usually swing less than tiny, speculative ones. The smaller‑cap slice, though modest, adds some growth potential and diversification because these businesses can behave differently across cycles. Because you’re using broad index funds, the small and mid‑cap weights will adjust automatically over time. One simple ongoing task is just confirming you’re comfortable with this big‑company tilt versus purposely seeking extra small‑cap exposure.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Two of the core holdings—the S&P 500 ETF and the total US stock market ETF—are highly correlated, meaning they move almost in lockstep. Correlation is just a measure of how similarly two investments behave; when it’s very high, holding both doesn’t add much diversification. Your overall diversification is still excellent thanks to the international stocks and cash‑like Treasuries, but there’s clear overlap between those two US funds. One potential clean‑up move could be deciding if you want to consolidate into a single broad US fund, which would simplify tracking and slightly reduce unnecessary duplication without changing your overall exposure much.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The Efficient Frontier is a curve that shows the best possible risk‑return trade‑offs using only your existing building blocks. “Efficient” here just means the highest expected return for a given level of risk, not necessarily the best fit for every personal goal. In your case, the optimizer suggests a mix that slightly boosts expected return at the same risk level, mostly by trimming overlapping positions and fine‑tuning weights. However, these models rely on historical data and assumptions that can shift. A practical way to use this insight is as a gentle nudge toward simplifying and tightening the current mix, not as a rigid rule to chase tiny, model‑driven improvements.

Dividends Info

  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 4.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.72%

The overall yield of about 1.72% reflects a growth‑oriented stock mix paired with a higher‑yielding ultra‑short Treasury position. The international equity ETF boosts the income profile a bit, while the US stock ETFs sit near typical market yields. For investors focused on long‑term growth rather than living off income today, this level of yield is quite normal and aligns well with modern index portfolios. Dividends still matter because they can be reinvested, quietly compounding over time. If current income ever becomes a bigger priority, adjusting the balance toward slightly higher‑yielding holdings could increase cash flow, though usually at the cost of some growth potential.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 0.07%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

The total expense ratio around 0.04% is impressively low and a real strength of this setup. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is like a small annual service fee charged by each fund; keeping it tiny means more of the portfolio’s gains stay in your pocket. These costs are substantially below many actively managed alternatives and align closely with best practices for long‑term investing. Over decades, even a difference of 0.5% per year can compound into a surprisingly large gap. The main task here is simply maintaining this low‑cost mindset if you add or change funds in the future, favoring straightforward index products over pricier, complex options.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey