Two fund global equity portfolio with strong diversification and low costs across regions and sectors

Report created on May 3, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a simple two‑fund mix holding 88% in a global developed markets ETF and 12% in an emerging markets ETF. Everything is in stocks, with no bonds or cash in the strategic allocation. That means the portfolio’s ups and downs are fully driven by global equity markets rather than a blend of different asset types. The structure is straightforward and easy to understand, which is a strength from an operational perspective. With just two broad ETFs, the portfolio still reaches thousands of companies worldwide. This kind of “core plus” setup often behaves very similarly to the global stock market while leaving room for slightly different regional or style tilts.

Growth Info

From May 2016 to April 2026, €1,000 in this portfolio grew to €3,273, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.61%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out all the bumps along the way. The maximum drawdown was about -33.7% during early 2020, meaning the portfolio temporarily lost a third of its value from peak to trough before recovering in five months. Compared with benchmarks, it lagged the US market but slightly beat the global market. That pattern is common for diversified portfolios: less concentrated in the strongest region than a pure US index, but well aligned with broader global performance.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses thousands of simulated paths based on historical behavior to show a range of possible 15‑year outcomes. Think of it as rolling the dice 1,000 times on future return patterns while respecting past volatility and correlations. The median outcome turns €1,000 into about €2,765, with a central band from roughly €1,778 to €4,249. There are also more extreme but less likely paths, from about breaking even to very strong growth. These simulations are not predictions; they simply illustrate what could happen if markets behave in ways similar to the past, including both good and bad stretches.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of this portfolio is invested in equities, with 100% in stock ETFs and no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. Asset classes are broad categories like stocks and bonds that tend to behave differently across market cycles. A 100% equity allocation usually means higher potential long‑term returns but also larger short‑term swings, especially during market stress. Compared with a multi‑asset mix that includes bonds, this structure leans more heavily into growth and less into income or capital preservation. The “balanced” label here comes more from the global diversification within stocks than from a mix of different asset types.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    28%
  • Financials
    16%
  • Industrials
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is well spread, with technology at 28%, financials at 16%, and several other sectors between 3% and 11%. This distribution is similar to many global equity benchmarks, where tech is a leading sector but not the entire story. Sector diversification matters because different parts of the economy react differently to changes in rates, inflation, and growth. A tech‑heavy allocation can experience bigger swings when interest rates move or when innovation stocks fall out of favor. Here, the sizeable weights in financials, industrials, health care, and consumer‑focused areas help balance that tech exposure, supporting a more rounded overall risk profile.

Regions Info

  • North America
    66%
  • Europe Developed
    15%
  • Asia Developed
    6%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Emerging
    5%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio has a clear tilt toward North America at 66%, with developed Europe at 15% and the rest spread across developed and emerging regions. This is broadly in line with global stock market weights, where North America is the largest block. Geographic diversification helps because economies and currencies can go through different cycles. The emerging markets slice, while relatively small, introduces exposure to faster‑growing but more volatile regions. Overall, this distribution avoids extreme home bias and is well‑aligned with global standards, which is helpful if the goal is to mirror the world market rather than bet heavily on a single region.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    48%
  • Large-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    1%

The portfolio leans strongly toward larger companies, with 48% in mega‑caps, 35% in large‑caps, and only small slices in mid and small caps. Market capitalization (market cap) reflects a company’s size, and bigger firms often have more stable business models and easier access to financing. A large‑cap‑heavy portfolio tends to move more like mainstream indices and may be somewhat less volatile than a portfolio packed with smaller, more speculative companies. The modest exposure to mid and small caps still adds some extra growth and diversification potential, but the main behavior here will track the fortunes of global blue‑chip companies.

True holdings Info

  • Apple Inc
    6.59%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Microsoft Corporation
    4.64%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Amazon.com Inc
    4.60%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    3.87%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    2.83%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc
    2.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Tesla Inc
    2.37%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
  • Siemens Energy AG
    1.99%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
    1.88%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • MercadoLibre Inc.
    1.50%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
  • Top 10 total 32.74%

Looking through the ETFs’ top holdings, familiar global names like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, NVIDIA, and Alphabet appear prominently, together making up a noticeable portion of the portfolio. Because these companies show up via the underlying indices, there is some concentration in the biggest global firms, but this is typical for market‑cap‑weighted funds. The coverage here is based only on each ETF’s top 10 positions, so true overlap is likely higher than reported. Even so, the broad index structure means that, beyond these giants, a long tail of smaller holdings contributes meaningfully, reducing the risk that any single company fully dominates outcomes.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 12%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 100%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 12%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Neutral
Data availability: 12%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Very low
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
High
Data availability: 100%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure shows a very low tilt to size and yield, with neutral readings on value, momentum, and quality and a high tilt toward low volatility. Factors are characteristics like “value” or “momentum” that help explain why some groups of stocks behave differently from others. A very low size exposure means the portfolio behaves more like a large‑cap index than a small‑cap‑tilted strategy. The very low yield reading suggests it doesn’t especially favor high‑dividend stocks. The high low‑volatility tilt indicates a slight preference for steadier companies, which historically have had smaller price swings, even though that does not eliminate the risk of significant drawdowns.

Risk contribution Info

  • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
    Weight: 88.00%
    88.0%
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
    Weight: 12.00%
    12.0%

Risk contribution analysis shows each ETF’s share of overall volatility closely matches its weight: the developed markets ETF at 88% contributes about 88% of risk, and the emerging markets ETF at 12% contributes about 12%. Risk contribution measures how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from its simple weight when assets have very different volatility. Here, the 1.00 risk/weight ratios mean the two positions have broadly similar risk per euro invested. That’s consistent with both being diversified equity funds, so there is no hidden “hot spot” where a small holding disproportionately drives overall risk.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the efficient frontier chart, this portfolio sits essentially on the curve, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.58 versus 0.78 for the maximum‑Sharpe and 0.77 for the minimum‑variance mix using the same holdings. The Sharpe ratio is a simple measure of risk‑adjusted return: how much extra return you get per unit of volatility above a risk‑free rate. Being on or near the frontier means that, for its current level of risk, the portfolio is already using its two funds in an efficient way. Reweighting could slightly change the balance of risk and return, but the current configuration is already quite efficient.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS 0.18%
  • Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF 0.19%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.19%

The total ongoing fund charges are around 0.19% per year, which is very low for a globally diversified equity portfolio. These costs, often called TER (Total Expense Ratio), are like a small annual service fee taken directly from fund assets. Low costs matter because they compound over time; every euro not spent on fees can stay invested and grow. Compared with many active funds or older index products, this fee level is impressively lean. Combined with the broad exposure and simple structure, the cost profile provides a solid foundation for long‑term compounding without a large performance drag from management expenses.

What next?

Create your own report?

Join our community!

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey