Globally diversified stock and gold mix with cautious risk level and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Apr 10, 2026

Risk profile Info

3/7
Cautious
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is built around three simple pieces: a broad developed-world equity ETF at 75%, an emerging-markets equity ETF at 15%, and a physical gold ETC at 10%. So roughly nine euros out of ten are in global stocks and one euro in gold. This keeps the structure very easy to understand and manage. A core global ETF doing most of the heavy lifting is a common and sensible foundation for long-term investors. The added slice of emerging markets increases growth potential and risk a bit, while gold offers a small diversifier. Overall, this is a clean, buy-and-hold friendly setup with no clutter, which usually helps investors stay disciplined through market ups and downs.

Growth Info

Over the period from mid-2021 to early 2026, €1,000 grew to about €1,634, giving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.02%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. The portfolio slightly beat the US market and clearly outpaced the global market, while suffering a relatively mild maximum drawdown of -16.04% versus over -21% for the benchmarks. That means it fell less in its worst period while still keeping up in returns. This combination of solid growth with limited downside is very encouraging, though it’s important to remember that past results do not guarantee similar performance in the future.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation projects many possible 15‑year paths by remixing historical return and volatility patterns. Think of it as running 1,000 “what if” futures for this mix of assets. The median outcome shows €1,000 potentially growing to about €2,698, with a fairly wide likely range between roughly €1,800 and €4,100. The average annual return across simulations is 7.73%, and roughly three out of four scenarios end with more than the starting amount. This is not a forecast or promise: simulations depend heavily on past data and assumptions that may not repeat. Still, they give a useful sense of both upside potential and the range of outcomes a long-term investor might need to mentally prepare for.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    90%
  • Other
    10%

From an asset class perspective, about 90% is in equities and 10% in “other,” which in this case is gold. That means the portfolio is primarily driven by global stock markets, with only a modest buffer from the non-equity slice. For a “cautious” risk classification, this is actually on the growth‑oriented side, but the choice of broad, diversified equity funds keeps the risk more controlled. Gold tends to behave differently from stocks, especially during crises, so even a 10% allocation can help reduce overall volatility and drawdowns. This asset split is simple, transparent, and generally well-suited for long-term wealth building, while still acknowledging the desire for a bit of downside cushioning.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    25%
  • Financials
    15%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector-wise, the portfolio has a noticeable tilt toward technology at 25%, followed by significant allocations to financials, industrials, and consumer-related sectors. This pattern is broadly in line with common global equity benchmarks, which is a strong signal of healthy diversification. A sizeable tech weighting can boost growth when innovation and digital trends are strong, but it can also mean more sensitivity to interest rates and sentiment around high-growth companies. The good news is that exposures to more defensive areas like consumer staples, health care, and utilities are also present. That mix helps smooth the ride when markets rotate away from growth, as not everything in the portfolio is driven by the same economic story.

Regions Info

  • North America
    56%
  • Europe Developed
    13%
  • Asia Developed
    7%
  • Asia Emerging
    6%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, the portfolio is anchored in North America at 56%, with meaningful exposure to developed Europe and developed Asia, plus smaller slices in emerging regions like Asia, Africa/Middle East, and Latin America. This spread lines up well with how global equity markets are weighted, which is exactly what broad diversification aims for. Being strongly tilted to North America has historically been rewarding, but it also ties outcomes to that region’s economic and currency fortunes. The emerging-market allocation adds different growth and policy environments into the mix. Overall, this geographic blend is close to global standards and offers a solid base for long-term investors who want the world’s major markets represented without overcomplicating things.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    44%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    14%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

By market capitalization, the portfolio leans heavily toward mega-cap and large-cap stocks, with 75% in these bigger companies and about 14% in mid-caps. Large and mega caps are typically more established businesses with deeper liquidity, which can make price movements somewhat more stable than smaller, more speculative companies. This cap profile is close to broad market norms and helps keep risk in check for cautious investors. The relatively modest mid-cap exposure still allows some participation in faster-growing firms without making the portfolio overly sensitive to small-company volatility. In practice, this means the portfolio tends to behave similarly to a global “blue chip” index rather than a more aggressive small-cap-heavy strategy.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    4.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Apple Inc
    3.44%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Microsoft Corporation
    2.43%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    2.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Amazon.com Inc
    1.90%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.64%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Broadcom Inc
    1.39%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    1.37%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    1.16%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
    0.91%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Top 10 total 20.22%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Looking through the ETFs, the largest underlying company exposures are familiar global giants such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon, each appearing via the funds. The top names come mostly from the same broad market index, so there is some overlap: for instance, NVIDIA at 4% and Apple at 3.44% of the overall portfolio. Overlap can quietly increase dependence on a handful of mega-cap companies, even when only ETFs are held. That said, the visible overlap is still moderate, and coverage is only based on ETF top-10 holdings, so the true diversification is wider. The key takeaway is that large tech-related firms are important drivers of returns here.

Risk contribution Info

  • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
    Weight: 75.00%
    82.6%
  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
    Weight: 15.00%
    15.7%
  • iShares Physical Gold ETC EUR
    Weight: 10.00%
    1.7%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding actually drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from its percentage weight. Here, the core developed-world ETF is 75% of the assets but contributes over 82% of the total risk. The emerging-markets ETF is 15% of the weight and roughly 16% of the risk, fairly proportional. Gold is the standout: it is 10% of the portfolio but adds less than 2% of the total risk, meaning it acts as a stabilizer. This pattern is very healthy: risk is concentrated in broad, diversified equity funds rather than in narrow bets, and the gold slice meaningfully dampens volatility relative to its size.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The risk–return chart shows that, based on historical data, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier represents the best expected return for each risk level using just these three holdings in different weightings. With a Sharpe ratio of 0.59, the current mix delivers less risk-adjusted return than both the minimum-variance combination and the max-Sharpe combination, which have Sharpe ratios above 1.3. In plain terms, there are mathematically better ways to combine the same three assets to either lower risk or increase expected return. Without adding any new products, simply adjusting weights could move this portfolio closer to the frontier and make each unit of risk work harder.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C 0.18%
  • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.20%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.18%

The ongoing charges here are impressively low. The total TER (Total Expense Ratio, the annual fee charged by funds) is around 0.18% per year, which is very competitive for global and emerging-markets exposure. Low costs matter because they are one of the few things investors can control, and even small fee differences compound significantly over decades. Paying under 0.20% for diversified global equities and gold is a strong structural advantage. It leaves more of the underlying market return in the investor’s pocket instead of leaking away in fund charges. As long as the chosen ETFs track their indices well, this cost structure provides an excellent foundation for long-term compounding.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey