A highly aggressive tech tilted portfolio with strong us focus and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Nov 10, 2024

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is very concentrated in three equity ETFs: a broad large cap fund at 50 percent a semiconductor themed fund at 30 percent and a high dividend US equity fund at 20 percent. Compared with a typical broad equity benchmark this mix leans harder into one industry and has zero exposure to bonds or cash. That makes it more volatile day to day and more sensitive to stock market cycles. To smooth the ride a bit an investor could slowly add a small allocation to more defensive assets or a broader global fund while keeping the core growth focus intact.

Growth Info

The reported historical CAGR of over 260 percent is almost certainly a data or calculation issue because such a rate is unrealistically high for any normal multi year period. However the max drawdown of about minus 33 percent is believable and highlights how sharply this type of portfolio can fall during market stress. Remember CAGR just shows average annual growth over time like average speed on a road trip and past numbers never guarantee future results. It can help to mentally prepare for repeated 20 to 40 percent drops and decide in advance whether you would hold add or trim during those episodes.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation output showing minus 100 percent for nearly every percentile and zero positive outcomes indicates the model inputs were likely incorrect or incomplete rather than predicting total wipeout. Monte Carlo analysis takes past return and volatility patterns then runs thousands of random “what if” paths to show a range of possible futures. It can be useful to visualize best case worst case and middle paths but it always relies on assumptions that can be wrong. Treat any projection as a rough weather forecast not a promise and focus more on whether you can live with wide swings than on precise numbers.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Everything here is in stocks with no allocation to bonds cash or alternatives. That all equity stance lines up with a speculative risk profile and maximizes exposure to market growth but it also maximizes exposure to downturns. When stocks fall sharply there is no stabilizing ballast to cushion the drop or provide dry powder to buy cheaper shares. Many broad benchmarks include at least some defensive assets for this reason. Someone wanting to keep the aggressive tilt could still consider a modest slice of lower volatility holdings which can improve the experience in deep bear markets without fully diluting the growth bias.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    50%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Financials
    8%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Industrials
    6%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is heavily skewed toward technology at roughly half the portfolio largely driven by the semiconductor ETF plus tech positions inside the broad index fund. The rest is spread across healthcare financials consumer areas energy and industrials in weights not far from common benchmarks which actually supports decent diversification outside that tech tilt. Tech heavy portfolios tend to do very well in growth friendly low rate environments but can be hit hard when rates rise or when investor enthusiasm cools. Keeping the tech emphasis intentional while watching that single theme does not dominate overall risk is a sensible ongoing habit.

Regions Info

  • North America
    94%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Europe Developed
    2%

The portfolio is almost entirely tied to North America at about 94 percent with only a sliver in developed Asia and Europe and virtually nothing in emerging markets. This home bias is very common for US investors and has been rewarded in the last decade as US stocks outperformed much of the world. That said a global benchmark usually holds more non US exposure which can help when leadership rotates across regions. If long term resilience is a goal gradually adding a small slice of broader international equity could reduce reliance on one country’s economy policy mix and currency.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    45%
  • Mega-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    2%

Most holdings sit in mega and big companies about 80 percent combined with a moderate chunk in mid caps and only a tiny slice in small caps. This looks similar to many broad market indexes where large firms dominate simply because of their market value. Big established companies often have steadier earnings and more analyst coverage while small companies can be more volatile but sometimes faster growing. This size mix is quite reasonable and aligns well with common benchmarks which is a positive. Anyone wanting extra growth potential could very selectively tilt a bit more to smaller names while accepting choppier returns.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk versus return basis this mix probably sits above the risk level that many investors would choose for the same expected return when plotted on an Efficient Frontier. The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing the best possible risk return tradeoff using a given set of assets just by changing their weights. Here swapping a bit of the concentrated growth exposure for more broadly diversified or lower volatility holdings could move the portfolio closer to that “efficient” curve. Efficiency does not mean safest or most diversified it simply means getting the most expected return for each unit of risk accepted.

Dividends Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.40%

The overall yield of about 1.4 percent is modest but the dedicated dividend ETF with around 3.8 percent adds a clear income component. Dividends are regular cash payments from companies which can provide a small paycheck like stream and historically have made up a meaningful portion of total stock returns. In this case most return potential still comes from price growth particularly via the semiconductor tilt while the dividend fund brings a bit of stability and income. For someone wanting more cash flow increasing the share of dividend oriented holdings could help but would typically mean giving up some pure growth exposure.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 0.02%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.13%

The weighted total expense ratio of roughly 0.13 percent per year is impressively low and a real strength. TER is like an annual membership fee charged as a percentage of assets and lower fees mean more of the return stays in your pocket. Over decades even small differences compound into meaningful dollar amounts. This cost level beats many actively managed approaches and lines up well with best practice for long term investors. The one pricier piece is the semiconductor ETF but its higher fee is typical for a more specialized fund. As long as the theme tilt is intentional the overall cost structure looks very efficient.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey