Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

A high growth US focused portfolio with tech concentration and modest diversification across sectors and sizes

Report created on Aug 8, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The structure is very equity-heavy, with about 98% in stocks and 2% in cash, and everything held through ETFs. Around 60% sits in a broad US large cap fund, while the rest tilts toward NASDAQ growth, semiconductors, leverage on the same index, small cap value, and a couple of niche industry funds. This creates a strong growth tilt but also low diversity, which your scores already flag. When most holdings are variations of the same theme, portfolio ups and downs tend to line up. One way to smooth the ride is to shift some weight from overlapping index exposures and narrow themes into funds that behave differently across market cycles.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix has done extremely well, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) near 19%. Think of CAGR as your average “speed” per year if you started with $10,000 and let it ride; over ten years at that rate it would hypothetically grow to around $55,000. That’s stronger than typical broad-market benchmarks, which reflects the growth and tech tilt. But the max drawdown of about -29% shows that when markets fall, this portfolio can drop sharply too. It’s important to remember past returns came during a very tech-friendly era and don’t guarantee similar results if conditions change.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which basically runs 1,000 “what if” paths using historical patterns, shows a very wide range of possible future outcomes. The median path ending around 1,190% means $10,000 could hypothetically land near $129,000, while the pessimistic 5th percentile around 180% would be closer to $28,000. An average simulated annual return above 23% looks eye-catching, but it’s built on past data and similar volatility. Markets don’t repeat perfectly, so these results should be treated as rough scenario ranges, not promises. For someone relying on this capital, dialing in risk tolerance and backup plans matters more than chasing the top-end projections.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    98%
  • Cash
    2%

With 98% in stocks and essentially no bonds or alternatives, this is a pure growth setup. A stock‑only approach can deliver strong long‑term upside, but it also magnifies short‑term swings and drawdowns. Compared with many “growth” benchmarks that still hold some defensive assets, this is on the aggressive side. The upside is simplicity and high expected growth; the trade‑off is higher emotional and financial stress in downturns. If stability, spending needs, or sleep quality are concerns, gradually layering in some lower‑volatility assets or even a slightly larger cash buffer can help smooth the ride without fully sacrificing growth potential over time.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    42%
  • Financials
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is clearly tilted toward technology, which makes up about 42% of the portfolio when you include the growth and semiconductor funds. That’s much higher than many broad benchmarks and helps explain the strong recent performance. Tech and related growth areas tend to be more sensitive to interest rates and sentiment, so they can drop harder when conditions shift. The presence of healthcare, financials, cyclicals, and a small slice of defensive sectors is a positive and adds some balance. Still, if one theme like semiconductors or growth has been a big winner, it can quietly grow too large, so checking whether that overweight is truly intentional is worthwhile.

Regions Info

  • North America
    97%
  • Europe Developed
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%

Geographically, the exposure is overwhelmingly US‑centric, with about 97% in North America and only token positions elsewhere. This lines up with a typical US‑based investor bias and has worked out well over the last decade as US markets outperformed many others. The benefit is familiarity and alignment with the local economy. The downside is that you’re highly dependent on one region’s fortunes, policy decisions, and currency. Broad global benchmarks usually hold notably more outside the US. Even a modest shift toward international developed or other regions can provide an extra diversification layer if US leadership rotates or faces a prolonged rough patch.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    42%
  • Large-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    3%
  • Micro-cap
    3%

Most holdings sit in mega and large cap companies, with about 76% in the biggest names and smaller slices in mid, small, and micro caps. This mirrors many broad indices and is a solid core structure. The small allocation to small cap value is a nice touch because historically that segment has behaved differently and sometimes outperformed at different points in the cycle. However, given how dominant the largest companies are, overall behavior will still largely track big US growth stocks. If the goal is more balance, gradually increasing exposure to smaller and mid-sized companies can reduce reliance on a handful of mega‑cap giants driving returns.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    ProShares Ultra S&P500
    High correlation

Several holdings move very closely together, especially the broad S&P 500 fund and the leveraged S&P 500 ETF. Correlation simply means how often two investments move in the same direction at the same time. When correlation is high, owning both doesn’t add much diversification; it mostly amplifies the same bet. That’s exactly what leverage does: it increases both gains and losses based on the same index. Trimming highly correlated, overlapping pieces and consolidating exposure into simpler, non‑leveraged funds can reduce complexity and risk, while often leaving overall return potential surprisingly similar over longer horizons.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

The Efficient Frontier is a concept that maps portfolios with the best possible trade‑off between risk and return using only the existing ingredients. The analysis suggests there’s a more “efficient” mix that could get a higher expected return for the same risk, or similar return with lower volatility, mainly by cutting overlapping exposures. Importantly, efficiency here is purely about risk‑return math, not about goals like income, taxes, or values. The note about removing highly correlated positions before optimizing makes sense: simplifying overlapping index and leveraged bets first can make any later fine‑tuning cleaner and easier to stick with emotionally.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.60%
  • VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF 1.90%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 0.70%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.95%

The overall dividend yield around 0.95% is relatively low, which is typical for a growth‑oriented, tech‑heavy equity mix. Dividends are the cash payments companies make to shareholders, like a small paycheck alongside price changes. Here, most of the long‑term payoff is expected from price appreciation, not income. That’s fine for someone focused on future growth rather than current cash flow. If stable income becomes a priority later, gradually shifting part of the portfolio into higher‑yielding, more mature businesses or income‑focused funds can help. For now, reinvesting these modest dividends supports compounding and aligns with a long‑term accumulation approach.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.58%
  • VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF 0.36%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 0.91%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.20%

The blended total expense ratio around 0.20% is impressively low, especially considering several specialized ETFs in the mix. Low costs are like a smaller “toll” taken from returns every year, and over decades they make a real difference. The main outlier is the leveraged S&P 500 fund with a much higher fee. That’s normal for such products but still worth noting, since you’re paying more for exposure that largely overlaps with cheaper holdings while adding extra risk. Tightening the lineup around broad, low‑cost, non‑overlapping funds could maintain return potential while keeping fees and complexity firmly under control.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey