Global equity core with a strong tilt toward large cap US growth and technology exposure

Report created on May 9, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is made up of just two equity ETFs, with 70% in a global all‑world fund and 30% in a Nasdaq‑100 tracker. That means everything here is in stocks, with no bonds or cash included in the analysis. Structurally, the all‑world ETF forms a diversified core, while the Nasdaq‑100 slice adds a focused growth tilt. Using a small number of broad funds keeps the portfolio simple and easy to understand. The combination creates a “core and satellite” style: one holding gives wide market coverage, the other layers on concentrated exposure to a specific index. Overall, the structure is straightforward and leans clearly toward long‑term equity growth rather than capital stability.

Growth Info

From July 2019 to May 2026, £1,000 invested in this mix grew to about £2,645. That translates to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.39%, which is how much the portfolio grew per year on average, like a long‑distance average speed. Over the same period, it outpaced both the US market and the broader global market by a meaningful margin. The portfolio did, however, experience a maximum drawdown of around ‑29% during early 2020, before recovering in about four months. This pattern shows strong upside participation with sharp, but relatively short‑lived, setbacks, which is typical of growth‑heavy stock exposure.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection runs 1,000 simulations to imagine how £1,000 might grow over 15 years using patterns from historical returns and volatility. It’s like repeatedly shuffling and replaying market history to see many plausible paths. The median outcome ends near £2,717, with a central “likely” range between roughly £1,795 and £4,217. The wide gap between pessimistic and optimistic results highlights how uncertain future markets can be, even when using the same starting portfolio. An average simulated annual return of 7.91% is notably lower than recent historical returns, reflecting that models often assume more moderate growth going forward. As always, simulations are just scenarios, not forecasts or guarantees.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of this portfolio sits in stocks, with no listed allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. Equities are typically the main engine for long‑term growth, but they also drive most of the ups and downs in account values. In many broad benchmarks, stocks still dominate, but there is usually some allocation to lower‑risk assets that can soften volatility. Here, the absence of those stabilisers means the portfolio will tend to move more closely with global equity markets, both in rallies and in sharp downturns. The upside is simplicity and clear exposure; the trade‑off is less built‑in dampening during stressful market periods.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    34%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Telecommunications
    11%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is heavily tilted toward technology at 34%, followed by financials, telecoms, and consumer‑facing areas. This means a large chunk of the portfolio’s behaviour will be linked to companies whose fortunes depend on innovation, digital infrastructure, and discretionary spending cycles. Compared with many global indices, this tech weight is on the higher side, partly because of the Nasdaq‑100 component. Tech‑heavy portfolios often do very well when growth companies are in favour and interest rates are stable or falling, but they can be more volatile when rates rise or when markets rotate toward more defensive or value‑oriented areas. The remaining sectors still provide some balance, but growth‑oriented industries clearly dominate.

Regions Info

  • North America
    74%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about 74% of the portfolio is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other parts of Asia, emerging Asia, and smaller allocations to Australasia, Latin America, and Africa/Middle East. Compared with a typical global equity benchmark, this is a pronounced tilt toward North America, especially the US. That concentration has helped in recent years as US markets, particularly large tech names, have led performance. The flip side is that economic, regulatory, or currency shocks in that region would have an outsized impact here. The non‑US exposures still add some global diversification, but the portfolio’s core risk and return drivers remain primarily North American.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    49%
  • Large-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    15%

By market capitalisation, the portfolio is dominated by mega‑cap and large‑cap companies, which together make up about 84%, with the remaining 15% in mid‑caps. Mega‑caps are the world’s biggest listed firms, often more diversified and resilient, but also more closely watched and efficiently priced. This size profile means the portfolio is closely aligned with mainstream global indices, which also lean heavily toward the largest companies. Such a tilt can reduce some of the extreme swings associated with smaller stocks, while still participating in broad equity growth. However, it means less exposure to potential “up‑and‑coming” smaller firms, so returns will be driven mostly by the performance of well‑established market leaders.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    5.74%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Apple Inc
    5.08%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Microsoft Corporation
    3.79%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.90%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    2.33%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    2.01%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    1.99%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Tesla Inc
    1.89%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    1.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
  • Top 10 total 28.76%

Looking through the ETFs, the top underlying holdings show notable concentration in a handful of global giants. NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, the two Alphabet share classes, Broadcom, Meta, Tesla, and TSMC together make up a significant slice of the portfolio. Many of these names appear in both the all‑world fund and the Nasdaq‑100 ETF, creating overlap that amplifies exposure to them. Because only top‑10 ETF holdings are included, actual overlap is likely somewhat higher than shown. This kind of hidden concentration means that news affecting a small group of mega‑cap tech and growth companies can disproportionately move the overall portfolio, even though it is implemented via diversified funds.

Risk contribution Info

  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    Weight: 70.00%
    68.7%
  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
    Weight: 30.00%
    31.3%

Risk contribution measures how much each holding adds to the portfolio’s overall volatility, not just how big it is. Here, the Vanguard all‑world ETF is 70% of the weight and contributes about 69% of the risk, while the Nasdaq‑100 ETF is 30% of the weight and contributes around 31% of the risk. Those numbers are very close to proportional, which suggests both funds have broadly similar volatility in this context. There is no single holding whose risk contribution is dramatically higher than its size, which is a positive sign. Position sizing is relatively balanced given there are only two funds, and neither dominates the portfolio’s ups and downs beyond its share.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The risk‑return chart shows this portfolio sitting on or very close to the efficient frontier, which is the curve representing the best achievable return for each risk level using just these two ETFs in different weightings. The current Sharpe ratio — a measure of return per unit of risk, after accounting for a risk‑free rate — is 0.7. The maximum Sharpe portfolio would take slightly more risk and target higher return, while the minimum‑variance mix sits at almost the same risk as now with a somewhat lower expected return but a higher Sharpe. Overall, the data suggests the present allocation uses these two funds in a risk‑efficient way for its chosen risk level.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.24%

The combined total expense ratio (TER) of the portfolio is about 0.24% per year, based on 0.19% for the all‑world ETF and 0.35% for the Nasdaq‑100 ETF. TER is the ongoing annual fee charged by the funds, quietly deducted from performance, a bit like a small service charge. These costs are relatively low by active‑fund standards and reasonably competitive even among passive index trackers. Lower fees leave more of any gross return in the investor’s hands and compound beneficially over time. From a cost perspective, this is a strength of the portfolio: it achieves global and growth exposure using broadly low‑cost building blocks.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey