Roast mode 🔥

A dividend heavy growth stack flirting with concentration risk and long bond theatrics

Report created on Dec 11, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio screams "I like dividends and big US names" while trying to be diversified and mostly succeeding on paper. Thirty percent in a dividend appreciation ETF plus a broad total stock market fund and a mega cap growth sleeve creates obvious overlap — two funds are effectively doing the same heavy lifting. The mix includes a modest small value sleeve and a long bond stake that reads like a hedge gone theatrical. Recommendation: simplify the core US exposure, avoid duplicate broad-cap funds, and consciously choose sleeves that actually add different return drivers rather than more of the same.

Growth Info

Past performance shows a tasty CAGR of 13.8% which reads wonderfully until someone points out the 29.6% max drawdown. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) is the smoothed annual growth rate like averaging speed over a cross-country road trip. High returns with deep drawdowns mean volatility was real and concentrated winners likely drove results. Remember past data is like yesterday’s weather — informative but not prophetic. Recommendation: stress test with drawdown tolerance, size positions to survive market stress, and consider buffers (bonds, diversification) that make the ride less stomach-churning during a repeat drawdown.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulations (randomized future scenarios to show a range of possible outcomes) give a sexy median upside and few negative runs — 976 of 1,000 simulations positive — but that optimism ties to assumptions: returns, volatilities, and correlations mirroring history. Simulations are helpful but they aren’t crystal balls; think of them as many alternate movie scripts, not guaranteed sequels. Recommendation: run scenarios with higher-than-historical volatility and prolonged low-return periods; plan for conservative percentiles rather than lottery-style medians when deciding withdrawals or goals to avoid nasty surprises.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    89%
  • Bonds
    10%
  • Cash
    1%

The split is very equity heavy — 89% stocks, 10% bonds, 1% cash — which is fine if you signed up for a volatile growth ride. But "balanced" usually implies a steadier bond buffer. Here bonds are a lipstick-on-a-rollercoaster move: inadequate to dampen a 30% drawdown. Recommendation: decide if the goal is true balanced risk or growth with a bond flavor. If the former, increase fixed income and diversify bond types; if the latter, accept higher volatility and set formal rebalancing and emergency cash rules so setbacks don’t force fire sales.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    16%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    5%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Tech dominance at 27% and financials at 16% reveal a clear sector tilt: a heavy dependence on growth winners and cyclical finance performance. That tech concentration behaves like an energy drink for returns until regulation, interest rate shifts, or sentiment reverses and then everything gets shaky. Recommendation: intentionally cap sector exposure or add counterbalancing sleeves that lower sensitivity to a single sector cycle. Sectors should be chosen for return drivers not habit — don’t let a few large winners double as your risk management plan.

Regions Info

  • North America
    76%
  • Europe Developed
    6%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geography reads "America or bust" with 76% North America and thin allocations elsewhere. That’s comfortable for someone who knows and likes US markets, but it’s a single-country risk in disguise: corporate cycles, policy shifts, or sector weights within the US can hit this portfolio hard. Recommendation: if global diversification is meaningful to you, add intentional non-US exposures that aren’t just token positions — look for different economic cycles, currency diversifiers, and structural growth stories abroad to smooth correlated US shocks.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    35%
  • Large-cap
    28%
  • Mid-cap
    12%
  • Small-cap
    7%
  • Micro-cap
    6%

Mega caps at 35% and big caps at 28% dominate, with small and micro caps a tiny fraction. This is the classic large-cap comfort strategy: stability in name but less exposure to size-related return premia that historically rewarded patient investors. Small value exists but is underweighted relative to its potential contribution to diversification and return. Recommendation: consider resizing caps to match your desired risk premium; if you truly want small-cap value exposure, give it enough weight to matter or stop pretending it diversifies meaningfully.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Two large US equity funds are flagged as highly correlated which means they move together and provide little diversification. Correlation measures how similarly assets move — +1 means they dance in perfect sync, -1 means one’s falling is the other’s gain. Relying on correlated assets is like insuring your car and then parking it in a flood zone: you’re covered on paper but vulnerable in the same scenarios. Recommendation: replace or trim overlapping funds and add assets with low correlation to the equity core — think different geographies, styles, or non-equity diversifiers.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the efficiency front this portfolio is halfway there: good diversification metrics but poor at squeezing true diversification out of holdings due to overlapping US exposures. Efficient Frontier is the set of portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a given risk level — think of it as the best tradeoffs table. Recommendation: remove redundant assets, tilt toward low-correlation sleeves, and perform mean-variance checks to see if each incremental holding actually moves the portfolio toward the efficient frontier rather than away from it.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 4.40%
  • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares 1.60%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.76%

The portfolio’s dividend yield is modest at 1.76% overall, driven by varying yields across funds; the Dividend Appreciation ETF and long Treasury push some income but not enough to claim an income-first strategy. Overreliance on dividend labels can be misleading — dividends are part of total return and can be cut when companies retrench. Recommendation: if income is a goal, size income-oriented assets meaningfully, or if total return is the aim, don’t overpay for dividend branding. Also consider tax efficiency — dividends taxed differently across accounts.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares 0.06%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.08%

Costs are commendably low: total TER around 0.08% and most ETFs under 0.15% — someone clearly prioritized inexpensive wrappers. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the annual fee you pay for fund management, like a tiny speed bump on performance. Low costs are a genuine positive and deserve the dry praise they get. That said, keep an eye on trading costs, bid-ask spreads, and tax frictions. Recommendation: keep fees low, but don’t let low cost be an excuse to hold redundant funds that add overlap without value.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey