Roast mode 🔥

A stock only thrill ride pretending to be diversified while clinging to one giant index fund

Report created on Jan 10, 2026

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This setup is basically “I put everything in VTI and sprinkled some garnish on top.” Over 90% in one total US stock ETF means the rest of the positions are rounding errors, not real diversification. It loosely shadows a broad US benchmark, but with the illusion of extra sophistication from the tiny value and developed markets slices that don’t move the needle. It’s like ordering a burger with three kinds of lettuce and calling it a tasting menu. If the goal is real balance, position sizes under a few percent need to either graduate to meaningful weights or be cut and replaced with something that actually changes the portfolio’s behavior.

Growth Info

Historically, this thing has absolutely flown. A 15.75% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate, basically your average yearly speed on a wild road trip) would have turned $10,000 into roughly $41,000 in a decade-ish. But the max drawdown of -35.1% says you also hit some serious potholes along the way. Compared loosely to a typical global 60/40 portfolio, this is more like “all gas, no brakes” — great in a bull market, ugly in a crash. And yes, past data is yesterday’s weather: useful to pack a jacket, not proof it will rain tomorrow. If that -35% felt fine, the growth label fits. If not, the dial is set too spicy.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results are saying, “Probably fine, but don’t get cocky.” Monte Carlo is basically rolling dice on thousands of alternate market futures using past-like behavior; it’s a fancy way to guess how weird things might get. A 5th percentile outcome of about 65% growth means in rough worlds you still end up ahead, but not by much, while the median and higher percentiles look like champagne territory. The 992 out of 1,000 positive paths and ~14.2% average return scream optimism. Reality check: those assumptions lean on a hot historical run for US stocks. Future returns can easily be lower, so planning as if the median outcome is guaranteed is asking for disappointment.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset classes here are a joke: 100% stocks, 0% bonds, 0% cash, 0% anything else. This isn’t a portfolio; it’s an opinion: “Equities forever.” That’s fine for someone with a long runway and strong stomach, but let’s not pretend this is “moderately diversified” in any meaningful sense beyond owning lots of different tickers. When markets drop, there’s nothing here that usually goes up or even stays calm to cushion the blow. Think of bonds or defensive assets as seatbelts: they don’t make the car faster, but they keep your face out of the windshield. If stability or near-term spending matters, this needs an actual second asset class.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    33%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%

Sector-wise, the portfolio has a tech crush: 33% in Technology, then a decent chunk in Financials and a spread across the usual suspects. This is what happens when you mirror the modern US market — it’s Silicon Valley with some side characters. The risk is that you’re heavily tied to one narrative: innovation, growth, and low rates staying friendly. When tech hiccups, the whole thing catches a cold. While the sector spread looks reasonable on paper, it’s more “everyone rides the tech bus” than truly balanced roles. If smoother behavior is the goal, reducing reliance on one overachieving sector and leaning into more defensive earnings profiles would help.

Regions Info

  • North America
    95%
  • Europe Developed
    3%
  • Japan
    1%

Geography here screams “America or bust.” With 95% in North America and just a token 3% in developed Europe and 1% in Japan, global diversification is basically a polite suggestion, not a strategy. This is fine as long as the US keeps being the main character of global markets, but historically leadership rotates and other regions eventually have their day. Right now, it’s like you walked into a world buffet and ate only from the US table. If long-term resilience matters, shifting toward a more meaningful non-US slice would reduce the risk that one country’s politics, valuations, or currency drama hijack the entire financial future.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    40%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    20%
  • Small-cap
    7%
  • Micro-cap
    2%

The market cap breakdown is basically “we just followed the index”: 40% mega, 31% big, 20% mid, 7% small, 2% micro. That’s textbook market-cap weighting, which is totally fine but not exactly imaginative. The added small-cap value and value ETFs at ~1.5% each are too tiny to seriously tilt anything; they’re more like decorative seasoning than a real strategy. In crashes, big and mega caps usually fall too — maybe a bit less, but they absolutely don’t act like parachutes. If the idea is to lean into value or small caps, those positions need real size. If not, simplify and embrace that this is basically just “buy the whole US market and chill.”

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk–return efficiency angle, this thing sits firmly in the “high return, high punch in the face” corner. An efficient portfolio isn’t about magic high return with low risk; it’s about getting the best trade-off for a chosen risk level. Here, the dial is turned up to growth, but there’s basically no attempt to smooth the ride with uncorrelated assets. Historically strong returns make it look like genius, but that’s heavily dependent on US equity dominance. Slide in a mix of diversifiers and you’d likely sacrifice a bit of headline return for a noticeably calmer path. As it stands, it’s efficient only if the investor deliberately chose “I’ll take the turbulence, thanks.”

Dividends Info

  • Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares 1.90%
  • Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares 3.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 2.00%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.23%

The yield here is a modest 1.23%, which is basically pocket change in income terms. It’s fine for a growth-focused plan, but nobody’s living off this without selling shares. The developed markets ETF slightly boosts yield, and the value-tilted ETFs help a bit, but the weights are too small to matter much. Dividends can act like a slow, steady drip of return, especially in flat markets, but relying on them here would be like trying to pay rent with a bowl of loose coins. If income is any sort of goal, either much more emphasis on higher-yielding exposure or a dedicated income sleeve would be necessary.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.03%

Costs are where this portfolio accidentally flexes. A total expense ratio around 0.03% is absurdly low — you basically pay couch-cushion money for a full global-ish (okay, mostly US) equity ride. It’s the investing equivalent of finding a decent gym for $3 a year: no real complaints. That said, low fees don’t save anyone from volatility; they just ensure more of the pain and gains belong to the investor instead of the fund manager. If anything, this cost profile gives room to consciously add a slightly pricier defensive or diversifying component without blowing up efficiency, rather than obsessing over single basis points at the expense of balance.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey