A growth focused US heavy portfolio with strong historical returns and concentrated equity risk

Report created on Nov 13, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built entirely from US-focused stock ETFs, with heavy overlap across broad market and large cap indexes. Multiple funds track almost the same set of companies, which means the true underlying holdings are more concentrated than they look. This matters because simply holding more tickers does not automatically mean better diversification if they all move the same way. The overall design is clearly tilted toward long-term growth and has done well historically, but diversification is scored low for a reason. Trimming duplicate broad market funds and simplifying into fewer core holdings could keep the growth tilt while making the structure cleaner and easier to manage.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix delivered a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 16.8%, meaning $10,000 would have grown to roughly $47,000 over ten years if that return persisted. CAGR is just the “average speed” of growth over time. The max drawdown of around -33% shows that this portfolio can fall hard during market stress, which is typical for growth-tilted, equity-only setups. The fact that 90% of returns came from just 40 days highlights how missing a few big up days could hurt long-term results. While past performance is impressive, it cannot be relied on as a guarantee for the future.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulation runs many “what if” scenarios by remixing past return and volatility patterns to estimate a range of possible futures. Here, 1,000 simulations showed very strong median growth, with the middle outcome suggesting significant long-term upside, and even the lower 5th percentile staying positive. The annualized return across simulations, over 18%, is eye-catching but still only a statistical estimate. These projections help frame expectations around both upside and downside, not predict a single outcome. It is worth treating them as rough weather forecasts, not a promise. Keeping expectations realistic and ensuring the risk level still feels acceptable in a bad-case scenario is key.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

The allocation is almost entirely in stocks, with only a tiny cash slice and no bonds or alternative assets. This all-equity stance is perfectly aligned with a growth profile and helps explain the strong historical returns and high projected upside. It also means that in a severe downturn there is nothing in the mix designed to cushion the fall, so short-term losses can be deep and emotionally challenging. Stock-only portfolios are usually best matched to long time horizons and strong stomachs. Adding even a modest layer of less-volatile assets in a separate account or sleeve could smooth the ride if needed without abandoning the core growth focus.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    37%
  • Health Care
    18%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Industrials
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    1%

Sector exposure is heavily tilted toward technology, with meaningful allocations to healthcare, financials, consumer areas, and communication services. This tech and growth orientation has been a major tailwind over the past decade and is a big reason for the strong performance. The flip side is that tech-heavy portfolios can be more sensitive when interest rates rise or when markets rotate toward more defensive or value-oriented companies. The healthcare allocation is a nice stabilizing anchor since that sector often holds up relatively well in slowdowns. Regularly checking that the tech tilt is intentional, not accidental, helps ensure the risk is in line with personal comfort, especially heading into uncertain cycles.

Regions Info

  • North America
    98%
  • Europe Developed
    1%
  • Asia Developed
    1%

Geographic exposure is overwhelmingly concentrated in North America, with almost no allocation to international markets. This home bias has worked in recent years because US markets, especially large cap growth, have outperformed many global peers. The downside is that regional risks, like policy changes or economic slowdowns specific to one country, are not offset by other regions. Many common benchmarks include a significant slice of non-US stocks to balance these risks. Choosing to stay US-heavy can still make sense, but it is worth being aware that the portfolio’s fortunes are tightly tied to the US market, for better and worse, over the coming decades.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    40%
  • Mega-cap
    36%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    4%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Most of the holdings lean toward mega and large cap companies, with a smaller slice in mid caps and only a tiny allocation to small and micro caps. Large and mega caps tend to be more stable and widely followed, which often means slightly lower volatility and tighter tracking to major benchmarks. The modest exposure to smaller companies adds a bit of extra growth potential but doesn’t dominate risk. This structure is very similar to broad market indexes and is generally considered sensible. If more aggressive growth is ever desired, increasing small and mid cap exposure in a controlled way could move the risk-return profile without changing everything.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
    Invesco QQQ Trust
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    High correlation

Many ETFs in this portfolio are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move up and down together because they own very similar stocks. Correlation is a measure of how much assets behave alike; when it is high, owning more of the same type does not add much diversification. The overlap between multiple S&P 500, total market, Dow, and growth funds is a clear example. This overlap is not dangerous by itself, and the alignment with broad market benchmarks is actually a strength in terms of simplicity and clarity. Still, trimming redundant funds and consolidating into a smaller number of core holdings could maintain the same exposure with less clutter.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk-return basis, this portfolio sits in a strong spot but could likely move closer to the Efficient Frontier. The Efficient Frontier is the set of portfolios that offer the best possible tradeoff between risk and return given a fixed menu of assets. Here, optimization would not require adding new products but rather adjusting how much goes into each existing fund and removing redundant overlaps. The goal of being more “efficient” is not to change personal goals, just to get more expected return for the same risk, or less risk for the same return. This portfolio is already close; some targeted simplification might refine it even further.

Dividends Info

  • SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust 1.50%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 1.10%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF 4.40%
  • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares 1.30%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.36%

The total portfolio yield of around 1.4% is moderate, with some funds focused on higher dividends and others on pure growth. Dividend yield is the annual cash payout as a percentage of investment value and can be useful for those who like regular income. Here, the main engine is clearly capital appreciation rather than cash flow, which fits a growth-first mindset. The presence of a couple of high-dividend ETFs does provide a small income cushion and can slightly dampen volatility. If future income needs increase, gradually tilting more of the allocation toward the income-focused side could boost cash flow while staying within an equity-based framework.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust 0.16%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.20%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 0.10%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF 0.07%
  • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.11%

The overall cost level, with a total expense ratio around 0.11%, is impressively low. Expense ratio is the annual fee charged by funds, and shaving even a fraction of a percent can compound into meaningful differences over decades. This fee level is well in line with, or even better than, what many low-cost index investors pay, which strongly supports long-term performance. A couple of specialized funds charge more, but they occupy reasonable portions of the portfolio. Cleaning up overlapping broad-market ETFs could potentially lower costs a bit further and simplify tracking, but from a fee standpoint this lineup is already a solid long-term setup.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey