This portfolio has only about 3 months of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

Balanced global equity portfolio with light leverage and gold hedge built for diversified long term growth

Report created on Apr 5, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

5/5
Highly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification
Curious how your own portfolio scores? Same analysis, your holdings. First report free — no card needed. Analyze mine

Positions

The portfolio is spread across five ETFs, with roughly four-fifths in global equities and one-fifth in gold. Three core equity funds each hold about a quarter of the portfolio, giving broad market, dividend, and growth exposure. A smaller 2x leveraged world ETF adds a modest return “booster,” while physical gold acts as a diversifier and potential crisis hedge. This mix fits a balanced risk profile: growth-focused, but not all-in on aggressive bets. Because data covers only about three months, it’s too early to judge how this structure behaves across full market cycles, but the overall layout is sensible for someone seeking long-term growth with some downside cushioning.

Growth Info

Over the short three‑month window, €1,000 fell to about €977, a small loss but notably better than both the US and global equity benchmarks, which dropped more. The portfolio’s annualized loss (CAGR) of about -10% beats the US market’s roughly -21% and the global market’s -16% over the same span. Max drawdown, meaning the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, was around -7.7%, similar to or better than the benchmarks. With only one day driving most of the gains, results are noisy. Because this sample is tiny, none of these numbers should be read as a stable pattern; they’re just an early snapshot during a weak market phase.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses the short recent history to simulate many possible 15‑year paths for a €1,000 investment, then summarizes the outcomes. It’s like running 1,000 alternate futures where returns vary randomly based on past patterns and seeing where the money might end up. The median scenario lands around €2,505, with a wide but mostly positive range and an 84% chance of finishing above €1,000. However, because the starting dataset is only three months long, these projections are very shaky. They’re useful more as a rough illustration of uncertainty than as a reliable forecast of what will actually happen.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    80%
  • Other
    20%

Roughly 80% in equities and 20% in gold creates a growth‑first mix with a defensive twist. Equities are the main long‑term return driver, while gold sits in the “other” bucket and can sometimes offset stock market stress, especially in inflation or crisis environments. For a balanced risk profile, this split is quite reasonable: not as conservative as adding bonds, but more diversified than going 100% into stocks. Historically, such equity‑plus‑gold blends have behaved differently across regimes, but with just three months of data here, it’s impossible to say how this exact combination will respond in deeper bear markets or sharp rebounds.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    22%
  • Financials
    13%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Health Care
    5%
  • Utilities
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Real Estate
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector exposure is nicely spread, with technology the largest at 22%, followed by financials, industrials, and consumer areas. This looks more balanced than a pure tech‑heavy growth portfolio and aligns fairly well with broad global indices, which is a positive sign for diversification. A moderate tech tilt can boost growth but usually adds sensitivity to interest rates and innovation cycles. Smaller weights in utilities, energy, and real estate mean less dependence on more defensive, income‑oriented sectors. Given the short history, it’s too early to see how this mix behaves across a full rate cycle, but the structure itself is well‑balanced and broadly in line with global norms.

Regions Info

  • North America
    52%
  • Europe Developed
    14%
  • Japan
    6%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, about half the exposure is in North America, with additional stakes in developed Europe, Japan, and other Asian markets. This leans toward North America, but not overwhelmingly, and stays quite close to typical global equity benchmarks, which is a strong diversification sign. It means returns are driven by several large economies and currencies rather than a single market. Under‑representation of emerging markets keeps risk slightly lower but also limits exposure to higher‑growth regions. With only a brief three‑month window, we can’t draw conclusions about which regions will drive future performance; the main takeaway is that the regional spread is sensibly diversified today.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    31%
  • Large-cap
    28%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • Small-cap
    3%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

The portfolio skews toward mega‑ and large‑cap companies, with modest mid‑cap exposure and only a small slice in small caps. Large firms tend to be more established, with more stable earnings and better access to capital, so this tilt often reduces volatility relative to a small‑cap‑heavy portfolio. It also means performance will be tied closely to the biggest global names that dominate major indices. Smaller companies, while under‑represented here, can add growth and diversification but come with bumpier rides. Over just three months, it’s impossible to judge the trade‑off properly; structurally, though, this large‑cap bias lines up with mainstream index investing practices.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    1.26%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Apple Inc
    1.10%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Microsoft Corporation
    0.80%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Amazon.com Inc
    0.56%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    0.51%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.44%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Broadcom Inc
    0.42%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    0.42%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    0.39%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
  • Tesla Inc
    0.33%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
  • Top 10 total 6.23%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

The limited look‑through data shows familiar mega‑cap names at the top: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, TSMC, Meta, and Tesla. Each position is small on its own, but together they signal a noticeable tilt toward large tech and growth franchises. Overlap across ETFs means these companies may be held via several funds, creating more exposure than it first appears. Since only ETF top‑10 holdings are captured, real overlap is likely higher. This isn’t inherently bad—these have been strong long-term performers—but it does mean results can be heavily influenced by the fate of a relatively narrow set of big growth stocks.

Risk contribution Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
    Weight: 26.67%
    24.4%
  • Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
    Weight: 26.66%
    22.4%
  • WisdomTree Core Physical Gold USD ETC EUR
    Weight: 13.33%
    21.5%
  • L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF - USD Distributing ETF
    Weight: 26.67%
    21.5%
  • Amundi MSCI World (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
    Weight: 6.67%
    10.3%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from simple weight. Here, the top three positions by risk—NASDAQ‑100, ACWI, and gold—together account for about 68% of total volatility. Gold is notable: at 13% weight it contributes over 21% of risk, similar to the much larger equity funds, because it behaves differently and can be volatile in its own way. The 2x leveraged ETF is small in weight but still adds over 10% of risk, reflecting its amplified moves. Periodic sizing checks can help keep each holding’s risk role roughly aligned with its intended importance.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

The efficient frontier analysis suggests that, based on recent data, the current mix sits meaningfully below the best achievable risk‑return line using the same five holdings. The current Sharpe ratio (risk‑adjusted return) is negative and well below the maximum Sharpe portfolio, which would take slightly more volatility for a much higher expected return. There’s also a minimum‑variance mix that dialed down risk a bit without improving returns much. With only three months of history, these optimization outputs are highly unstable and shouldn’t be over‑interpreted. The practical takeaway is modest: some reweighting among the existing funds might slightly improve balance, but markets need more time to reveal how stable these relationships really are.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc 0.20%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.05%

The reported total TER of around 0.05% is impressively low for such a diversified, multi‑ETF setup. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is the annual fee charged by funds, and even small differences compound over long periods. Paying 0.05% instead of, say, 0.5% leaves more return in your pocket every year, which can add up to a meaningful amount over 10–20 years. Low costs are one of the few factors investors can control directly, and here the structure is strongly aligned with best practice. That solid cost foundation helps offset occasional market downturns, though of course it doesn’t remove investment risk.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey