A global stock portfolio with strong growth tilt and impressive diversification across regions and sectors

Report created on Aug 30, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is very straightforward: two broad stock ETFs, roughly 70 percent in developed markets and 30 percent in emerging markets. That structure creates a simple, rules-based global allocation that’s easy to understand and maintain. Compared with many “balanced” benchmarks that hold a large share of bonds, this setup is more growth-oriented and can swing more with equity markets. The good news is that it’s still broadly diversified within stocks, which helps spread risk. If stability becomes more important over time, adding a dedicated safety bucket in cash-like or lower‑risk assets outside this core equity block could support smoother overall wealth development.

Growth Info

A historic compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 11 percent means that, hypothetically, 10,000 euros invested at the start would have grown to roughly 28,000 euros over ten years. That’s firmly in line with long‑run global equity behavior and suggests the allocation has captured market returns well. The max drawdown of around minus 33 percent shows the flip side: during severe downturns, the portfolio can fall a third in value, which is normal for pure equity. This is comparable to standard world‑equity benchmarks. It’s important to remember that past performance only shows how markets behaved before and can’t guarantee similar future results.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs many simulated paths using historical patterns, suggests a wide range of outcomes. Monte Carlo is like running 1,000 “what if” market histories, mixing good and bad years randomly to see possible end results. Here, most simulations end positive, with a median outcome near tripling over the chosen horizon, while the 5th percentile still shows some growth but much lower. This supports the idea that staying invested through volatility has historically been rewarded. However, simulations are built on the past, so they cannot predict new crises or regime shifts. Treat the numbers as a helpful probability map, not a promise.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

The portfolio is 100 percent in stocks, with no bonds, cash, or alternative assets included. That creates a very clear growth engine but leaves day‑to‑day fluctuations entirely tied to equity markets. Traditional “balanced” benchmarks usually mix in a meaningful share of bonds, which can soften the impact of stock downturns. The current setup therefore aligns more with a growth‑tilted approach than a classic balanced mix. This is not inherently good or bad; it just means the emotional and financial tolerance for temporary losses needs to be higher. Complementing this core with a separate, lower‑risk allocation can help manage overall household risk.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    28%
  • Financials
    18%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is well spread across technology, financials, consumer‑related areas, industrials, healthcare, and others, broadly echoing common global equity benchmarks. A roughly quarter‑plus share in technology is typical today and has helped returns while rates were low and digital trends were strong. The flip side is that tech‑heavy allocations can feel more volatile when interest rates rise or growth expectations cool. This portfolio’s sector mix is still nicely diversified, with meaningful contributions from defensive areas like healthcare and consumer staples. Keeping an eye on whether one sector grows too dominant over time can help avoid an unintended single‑theme tilt driven purely by market performance.

Regions Info

  • North America
    53%
  • Asia Emerging
    14%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Asia Developed
    11%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Africa/Middle East
    3%
  • Latin America
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Europe Emerging
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio leans heavily toward North America while still maintaining solid exposure to developed Europe, Japan, and a meaningful slice of emerging markets. This pattern is very close to widely used global equity benchmarks and reflects the large size and profitability of U.S. companies in particular. That alignment is a strength, as it mirrors the global market rather than making big active bets on specific regions. The emerging‑markets stake brings diversification and long‑term growth potential but can be bumpier in the short run. Over time, it can be useful to check if this regional split still fits personal views on currency, politics, and economic cycles.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    48%
  • Large-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • Small-cap
    1%

Most holdings sit in mega and large companies, with modest exposure to mid caps and only a small slice in smaller firms. Large companies tend to be more stable, widely researched, and resilient in downturns, while smaller firms can offer higher growth but also more volatility and risk. This market‑cap profile is quite close to standard global indices, which is a plus for diversification and tracking broad economic activity. If a stronger tilt toward small and mid‑cap growth is ever desired, that would mean consciously shifting away from a pure market‑cap‑weighted approach and accepting a potentially bumpier ride in exchange for that tilt.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing the best possible trade‑off between risk and return for a given set of assets. “More efficient” means achieving either higher expected return for the same risk, or lower risk for the same return. Here, optimization based on historical data suggests a slightly higher expected return at similar risk by tweaking the mix between the two ETFs. That said, the improvement is modest and depends heavily on past patterns, which might not repeat. The current simple structure is already close to efficient, so any fine‑tuning should be weighed against complexity and the risk of chasing historical backtests.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR 0.20%
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS 0.18%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.19%

The total ongoing cost of around 0.19 percent per year is impressively low and compares very favorably with active funds and even many passive options. Costs compound just like returns, so every fraction of a percent avoided can translate into significantly higher wealth over decades. This fee level aligns with best practices for cost‑efficient index investing and supports better long‑term performance relative to higher‑fee alternatives. Keeping trading activity moderate and avoiding frequent switches can further limit hidden costs like bid‑ask spreads and taxes. Overall, the cost structure is a real strength and worth preserving as the portfolio evolves over time.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey