A concentrated growth portfolio with heavy technology exposure and a sizable ultra short term cash buffer

Report created on Aug 20, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

1/5
Single-Focused
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is very concentrated: most of the risk comes from a single stock plus a few growth and tech funds, while over a third sits in an ultra‑short Treasury ETF that behaves a lot like cash. Compared with a more typical growth allocation, this mix is both more aggressive on the equity side and more defensive via the cash‑like position. That barbell structure matters because returns will hinge on a handful of growth names, while the big cash slice dampens swings but also caps upside. Clarifying whether that large low‑risk slice is for near‑term spending or just “waiting on the sidelines” would help fine‑tune the balance.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix has delivered a very high Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of about 27%, meaning a hypothetical $10,000 could have grown to around $53,000 over the sample period. That’s far above broad market benchmarks, but it came with a max drawdown of about –43%, which is a deep temporary loss. This shows the classic growth trade‑off: strong upside when markets favor growth and tech, but painful drops in risk‑off periods. Also, 90% of returns came from just 35 days, highlighting how a few big moves drive outcomes. Past performance is encouraging but can’t be relied on to repeat, especially with such concentration.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs many random “what‑if” paths based on historical patterns, shows a wide range of potential futures. Monte Carlo is like simulating thousands of alternate market timelines to see how often things work out well or poorly. Here, even the low‑end (5th percentile) outcome shows strong growth, and nearly every simulation ended positive, with an average annualized return near 29%. That looks impressive, but it’s still built on past relationships that can change, especially for a portfolio leaning heavily on one theme and a single stock. It’s useful as a rough map, not a promise, so using it to sanity‑check risk comfort rather than to anchor expectations is healthier.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    65%
  • Cash
    34%
  • Bonds
    1%

Asset‑class wise, the portfolio is roughly two‑thirds stocks and one‑third cash‑like Treasuries, with almost no traditional bonds. For a “growth” profile, that amount of low‑volatility cash softens the ride and is actually more conservative than many growth peers, which might hold 80–90% in stocks. This is positive if the goal is growth with some built‑in shock absorber, but it also drags long‑term compounding when markets are strong. If the cash‑like allocation is meant as a strategic stabilizer, the mix is sensible; if it’s unintentional idle money, gradually shifting more toward productive long‑term assets could better match a growth label while still keeping some safety buffer.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    45%
  • Financials
    4%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    4%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Health Care
    3%
  • Industrials
    2%
  • Consumer Staples
    1%
  • Energy
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is clearly single‑focused: technology dominates, with relatively small slices in financials, consumer areas, communication services, and a thin spread across others. Compared with broad benchmarks, this is a heavy tech tilt, and that’s the main engine behind both the big historical gains and the high volatility. Tech‑heavy portfolios often do very well in falling‑rate and innovation‑driven environments but can be hit hard when rates rise or sentiment turns against growth. The strong alignment with popular growth benchmarks is a plus for capturing innovation, but relying so much on one segment means that adding a bit more balance across sectors could smooth the ride without abandoning the growth focus.

Regions Info

  • North America
    65%

Geographically, the allocation is almost entirely North America, closely tracking a U.S.‑centric benchmark and providing familiar, transparent exposure. This alignment is comforting and has worked well over the last decade, as U.S. markets have outperformed many regions. The trade‑off is that it misses potential diversification benefits from other developed and emerging markets, which sometimes lead when the U.S. lags. Home‑country concentration also ties outcomes more tightly to U.S. economic and policy dynamics. Keeping a strong U.S. core is reasonable, but even a modest allocation to other regions can help reduce reliance on a single economy while still keeping the portfolio simple and growth‑oriented.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    46%
  • Large-cap
    11%
  • Mid-cap
    6%
  • Small-cap
    1%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

By market capitalization, the portfolio leans heavily into mega‑cap and large‑cap names, with very little in mid, small, or micro caps. Mega‑caps tend to be more stable, widely researched companies, so this tilt can reduce company‑specific blow‑ups and closely track broad market behavior, which is a plus. On the flip side, smaller companies often drive a portion of long‑term equity returns and can zig when giants zag, improving diversification. The current structure favors quality and familiarity over size diversification. If capturing more of the “small but mighty” segment is a goal, modestly increasing diversified exposure to smaller companies could enhance long‑run growth potential without drastically changing overall risk.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The portfolio includes two funds that are highly correlated, meaning they usually move in very similar ways. Correlation is a measure of how often assets go up or down together; when it’s high, holding both doesn’t add much diversification. Having overlapping growth‑tech funds can create extra complexity without materially changing the risk profile. This doesn’t make the portfolio “wrong,” but it does mean some parts might be redundant. Streamlining into fewer, broader holdings that still deliver the same style exposure can simplify monitoring, reduce the chance of unintended concentration, and make it easier to see what’s truly driving performance and risk over time.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On risk versus return, the Efficient Frontier analysis suggests the current mix isn’t using its ingredients as effectively as possible. The Efficient Frontier is the set of portfolios that offer the best possible trade‑off between risk and return using the existing building blocks. Here, a more “efficient” mix of the same assets could reach a similar or slightly better expected return with lower volatility, mainly by trimming overlapping positions and adjusting weights. Efficiency doesn’t mean maximum diversification or maximum return; it means getting the most return per unit of risk taken. Using that lens can help tune allocations without changing the overall growth‑oriented character.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 4.10%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.76%

The overall dividend yield sits around 1.8%, with most of the income actually coming from the ultra‑short Treasury ETF rather than the growth and tech holdings. That’s typical for a growth‑tilted mix: the focus is on price appreciation rather than steady cash payouts. For someone prioritizing long‑term wealth building, reinvesting these modest dividends can still meaningfully boost compounding over time. The strong income from the cash‑like slice is a nice buffer for short‑term needs or periodic rebalancing. If ongoing income is only a secondary concern and growth is the main target, the current low‑to‑moderate yield is entirely consistent with that objective and doesn’t need to be higher.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • iShares® 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF 0.07%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

Costs are impressively low, with a total ongoing fee (TER) around 0.04%. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is the annual percentage skimmed to run the funds, and keeping this tiny is like reducing friction in a machine: more of the return stays in your pocket. This level of cost efficiency aligns very well with best practices and supports better long‑term performance compared to higher‑fee strategies. The only relatively pricier holding is still reasonable for its niche. With fees already near rock bottom, there’s little to be gained from fee‑cutting; the bigger levers from here are diversification, risk balance, and clarity about the role of each holding.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey