A broadly diversified stock heavy portfolio balancing global exposure and factor tilts for growth

Report created on Aug 11, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio structure is simple and focused: four stock ETFs, with 99% in equities and 1% in cash. A typical balanced benchmark usually mixes stocks and bonds, so this setup is more “growth‑tilted” than a classic balanced mix, even though the stated profile is balanced. This matters because being almost fully in stocks can mean larger swings in value, especially during sharp market drops. For someone comfortable with that, this structure is very clean and easy to manage. If smaller ups and downs are preferred, gradually adding a dedicated stabilizer asset, like high‑quality defensive holdings, could help smooth the ride without overcomplicating the portfolio.

Growth Info

Historically, turning a hypothetical 10,000 dollars into this mix would have grown very strongly, with a 14.91% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). CAGR is just the steady “average speed” of growth per year over time, like averaging your driving speed on a long road trip. Compared with typical blended benchmarks, this level of return is on the high side, reflecting the heavy stock weighting and tilts toward growth and smaller companies. Max drawdown of about -26% shows that big temporary drops did happen, though not extreme relative to pure equity portfolios. It’s important to remember that past performance only shows how this mix handled prior conditions and can’t guarantee similar future results.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis ran 1,000 simulations using historical data patterns to estimate possible future outcomes. Monte Carlo is like running thousands of “what if” market scenarios, shuffling returns in realistic ways. The median (50th percentile) outcome of about 600% suggests solid growth potential if markets behave broadly like the past. The 5th percentile at 113% shows that even in tougher simulated scenarios, the portfolio often still grew, while the top outcomes were much higher. However, simulation depends on history and assumptions; if future markets behave very differently, actual results could vary a lot. Treat these numbers as rough guideposts, not a promise of specific future values.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

Almost everything here is in one asset class: stocks. That creates strong participation in global economic growth but limits the classic diversification benefit you get from mixing very different assets that react differently to events. Most general benchmarks labeled “balanced” blend stocks with steadier assets that often cushion downturns. The positive angle is that, within stocks, the holdings are broad and globally spread, which is a strong diversification step inside the equity bucket. Anyone wanting a smoother ride could consider introducing a meaningful slice of lower‑volatility assets over time, rather than adding more niche stock funds, to better balance growth potential with drawdown control.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    16%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    12%
  • Industrials
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is impressively broad, with meaningful weights in technology, financials, consumer-related areas, industrials, healthcare, energy, and more. Technology at 27% is higher than many broad benchmarks, which often sit closer to the low‑ to mid‑20s. This tilt aligns with recent market leadership and can boost growth, but tech‑heavy portfolios can be more sensitive when interest rates rise or when growth stocks fall out of favor. On the positive side, having at least some exposure across all major sectors is a strong sign of diversification. If day‑to‑day swings feel too intense, slightly reducing the growth‑heavy tilt and reinforcing more defensive sectors could moderate volatility.

Regions Info

  • North America
    72%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Asia Emerging
    5%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about 72% is in North America with the rest spread across Europe, developed Asia, Japan, and a small slice in emerging regions. This is fairly close to world market weights, maybe a bit U.S.-tilted but not extreme, and it lines up reasonably well with common global benchmarks. That alignment is helpful because it avoids big unintended bets on any single region. The international allocation supports diversification by adding different economic cycles, currencies, and policy environments. If there is a desire to lean even more global, gradually nudging the non‑North American share upward could reduce dependence on one country’s market without overhauling the current structure.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    38%
  • Large-cap
    26%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    10%
  • Micro-cap
    9%

The portfolio has a nice spread across company sizes: meaningful exposure to mega and large caps, plus solid sleeves in mid, small, and micro caps. This combination supports both stability and growth. Larger companies usually provide more stability and liquidity, while smaller and value‑tilted companies can add long‑term return potential but with bumpier short‑term behavior. Compared with many broad benchmarks, the deliberate small‑cap value tilt adds a unique “factor” exposure that historically has sometimes outperformed, though not in every period. Keeping this mix as a conscious choice is smart; if volatility feels too high at times, slightly dialing back the smallest‑company slice could help dampen swings.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, also called the Efficient Frontier, this mix looks tilted toward higher return potential with correspondingly higher volatility, since it is almost all in stocks. The Efficient Frontier is just the set of portfolios that offer the best trade‑off between risk and return using the existing ingredients. Small shifts among the current funds—like tweaking the balance between broad market, small‑cap value, and growth‑heavy allocations—could nudge the portfolio closer to that “efficient” line. Efficiency here only means getting the most expected return for a chosen risk level; it does not necessarily optimize for other goals like income stability or minimizing drawdowns.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.56%

The total dividend yield of about 1.56% is modest but reasonable for a growth‑oriented stock portfolio. Dividends are the cash payouts companies make to shareholders and can act like a slow, steady “income stream” on top of price changes. The higher yield from international holdings helps offset the lower payouts from growth‑focused U.S. companies, which matches what’s commonly seen in global markets. For long‑term accumulators, reinvesting these dividends can quietly speed up compounding over the years. If regular cash income is ever a priority, a higher‑yielding tilt could be introduced later, but that might trade some growth potential for more current income.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.09%

The total expense ratio around 0.09% is impressively low and strongly supports long‑term results. Costs like expense ratios are ongoing fees charged by funds; even small differences compound over decades, similar to a slow leak in a bucket. Compared to many actively managed options or complex multi‑fund setups, this cost level is very competitive and well below average, which is a major strength. Keeping fees this low means more of the portfolio’s return stays in the account. It’s worth periodically checking that no higher‑cost funds are creeping in and that any new additions keep the blended cost low so this advantage is preserved.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey