A globally diversified all equity portfolio tilted toward large cap growth and technology exposure
Report created on Nov 21, 2024Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 80.00% -
XN Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
XNAS - IE00BMFKG444 20.00%
This portfolio is very simple and very focused: two broad equity ETFs, with roughly four parts in global stocks and one part in a growth-heavy index. That means 100% in shares and zero in bonds or cash-like assets, which is punchier than a typical “balanced” mix that often holds 40–60% safer assets. The simplicity is a strength because it’s easy to monitor and keep under control. The flip side is that portfolio swings will be closely tied to stock markets. Someone using this setup might think about whether they also want a separate safety bucket in cash or savings products outside this portfolio.
Growth
Historically, turning 10,000 euros into this mix and leaving it alone would have grown at about 12.64% per year on average. That average growth rate, often called CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate), is like the steady yearly speed of a car over a long road trip, smoothing out bumps. The max drawdown of -22.36% shows the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, which is relatively mild for a 100% equity setup and suggests solid resilience. Only 21 trading days made up 90% of gains, underlining why staying invested is crucial. This history is strong, but past performance can never guarantee similar future results.
Projection
The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 “what if” paths using historical patterns, shows a very wide range of possible futures. All but one simulation ended positive, with an average annualized return of 14.75%, and the median path finishing a bit above five times the starting value. The 5th percentile outcome still more than doubles capital, which is encouraging. But these models lean on past behavior and assumptions that markets will rhyme with history, which they don’t always do. It’s useful as a planning tool, not a promise. Someone using these numbers could treat them as rough guardrails, not a precise forecast.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All assets here are in one single class: stocks. That makes the portfolio very growth‑oriented and explains both the strong historic returns and the potential for noticeable volatility. Many “balanced” benchmarks blend stocks with bonds or cash to dampen swings, so compared to that, this mix is more adventurous. The diversification score is still high because the stock exposure is very broad across countries and industries, which is a big plus. However, when global equities fall together, there is no built‑in cushion. To manage that, the investor could rely on time horizon, external emergency savings, or—if needed—later adding a stabilizing asset bucket outside this core.
Sectors
- Technology 34%
- Financials 13%
- Consumer Discretionary 11%
- Telecommunications 10%
- Industrials 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector-wise, the allocation is clearly tilted to technology, at about a third of the portfolio, with the rest spread across financials, consumer areas, communications, industrials, healthcare, and smaller slices of defensives and cyclicals. This is similar to many modern global benchmarks that have become tech‑heavy, and your sector mix looks well-aligned with those standards, which supports broad diversification. The tech tilt benefits from innovation and growth, but it tends to be more sensitive when interest rates rise or growth expectations cool. Someone using this allocation could decide whether that extra growth flavor is intentional or if they would be more comfortable with less reliance on one fast‑moving sector.
Regions
- North America 72%
- Europe Developed 11%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Japan 5%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, there is a strong home in North America at around 72%, with Europe, Asia, Japan, and smaller emerging regions making up the rest. This is actually very close to how global stock market value is distributed today, so it aligns nicely with worldwide benchmarks and supports broad diversification across economies and currencies. The flip side is a big dependence on one region’s corporate and policy environment. While this has worked well in recent years, leadership can rotate over decades. Keeping this globally spread core is a solid foundation; from there, someone could, if they wish, slowly tilt more or less to specific regions using small satellite positions over time.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 49%
- Large-cap 34%
- Mid-cap 16%
Market capitalization exposure is dominated by mega and big companies, with almost half in the very largest firms and another third in large caps. Mid-sized businesses take the remaining slice, and there’s essentially no small-cap exposure. This is typical of global market-cap-weighted ETFs and matches common benchmarks well, which is a strong indicator of healthy diversification and liquidity. Large firms tend to be more stable and better researched, which can reduce company-specific blowups. However, some long-term studies show that smaller companies can offer higher potential returns, with more volatility. If someone wanted extra growth spice, a modest small-cap tilt alongside this core might be considered externally, without changing the current simple structure.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On a classic Efficient Frontier chart—where efficiency means the best possible trade‑off between risk and return for a given mix—this portfolio sits on the higher‑risk, higher‑return side because it is 100% in stocks. With only two closely related equity funds, there is limited room to rearrange weights and meaningfully lower volatility without also cutting expected returns. Within this asset set, the current blend already looks sensible, keeping the global core dominant and using the growth index as a satellite tilt. If someone wanted a more “efficient” outcome at lower risk, that would usually involve adding different asset types, like safer income-focused holdings, rather than just shuffling between these two positions.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C 0.20%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.19%
The total ongoing fee level, with a combined TER around 0.19%, is impressively low and firmly in best‑practice territory. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is like a small yearly service fee quietly taken from your investment; keeping it low leaves more of the performance in your pocket. Over 20 or 30 years, even a difference of 0.3–0.5 percentage points can add up to thousands of euros. These cost levels align with top global index solutions, and that’s a big structural advantage. There is little room or need to push costs down further; the bigger impact now comes from consistency, savings rate, and staying invested through market ups and downs.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey