Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

A low cost balanced portfolio with heavy domestic stock exposure and meaningful cash style buffer

Report created on Jan 15, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built around a single broad stock fund making up most of the value plus a sizable money market position that behaves like cash. A small slice is in duplicate exposure to the same stock index through an ETF and a handful of individual large US companies. Compared with a typical balanced benchmark that mixes stocks and bonds this setup is more stock‑tilted and very US focused but still softened by the cash‑like holding. This structure is simple and low maintenance which is a real plus. To tighten things up consider consolidating duplicate index exposures and deciding on a clear target split between growth assets and cash‑like stability.

Growth Info

Historically a 13.22% CAGR (compound annual growth rate) suggests that one dollar invested years ago grew to more than three over a typical couple of decades although exact timing matters. CAGR is like your average speed on a road trip smoothing out fast and slow stretches. A max drawdown near 30% means the worst peak‑to‑bottom fall was sharp but milder than a pure stock portfolio thanks to the cash slice. Thirty‑nine days making up 90% of returns shows how a few strong days drive long‑term results. Because past returns never guarantee future results it helps to focus on staying invested through swings rather than chasing recent performance.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis uses 1,000 random simulations based on historical patterns to estimate future paths. Think of it as replaying many alternate “market histories” to see a range of possible outcomes. The median outcome of roughly 541% growth indicates that in half the simulations the portfolio more than quintupled while the 5th percentile near 40% shows a much more modest result in tougher scenarios. The high rate of simulations with positive returns is encouraging but these numbers are not promises. Markets can change in ways history has never shown. Treat these projections as rough weather forecasts and check whether you would be comfortable even with the weaker outcomes.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    77%

The portfolio is effectively split between stocks as growth engines and a money market fund behaving like cash for stability although the summary reports cash as 0% since it is technically a fund. Compared to classic balanced mixes that usually include bonds this approach leans on cash instead of fixed income for risk control. That can reduce interest rate sensitivity but may also cap income and long‑term growth versus adding some high‑quality bonds. The strong stock slice aligns well with wealth‑building goals over long horizons. If stability or income becomes more important over time it may be worth defining a target range for defensive assets and considering whether cash alone is enough.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    10%
  • Health Care
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    1%

Sector exposure closely mirrors the broad US market with technology leading and solid weights in financials healthcare communications and cyclicals. This alignment with common benchmarks is a strong indicator of diversification across the real economy. Tech’s prominence brings good growth potential but can mean sharper swings when rates rise or when growth stocks fall out of favor. The small individual stock positions tilt slightly toward big well known companies without drastically changing the sector mix. This setup is already well balanced so any tweaks could be minor such as trimming any single stock if it grows too large or explicitly deciding whether you want to lean more toward steady sectors during uncertain periods.

Regions Info

  • North America
    77%

Geographically the portfolio is almost entirely in North America mainly US stocks. This matches many domestic benchmarks but differs from global market weights where non‑US markets hold a sizeable share. A home‑country tilt feels comfortable and has done well in recent years yet it concentrates economic and political risk in one region. Foreign markets can behave differently at times providing useful diversification when the US underperforms. There is nothing inherently wrong with a US heavy stance especially for someone earning and spending in dollars. Still it can help to decide whether this bias is intentional and whether adding even a modest slice of international exposure would better match long‑term global growth.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    33%
  • Large-cap
    23%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    2%

Market capitalization exposure is skewed toward mega and big companies with some mid and a modest slice of small and micro caps. This pattern is typical for broad market index funds and is well aligned with major benchmarks. Large firms tend to be more stable and liquid while smaller ones can offer higher growth but with bumpier rides. Having the bulk in big names helps smooth volatility and simplify tracking. The individual stock picks are also large established companies which keeps risk in check. If stronger growth potential is desired over a long horizon slightly emphasizing smaller companies could help but only if higher short‑term swings feel acceptable.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
    High correlation

The main correlated assets are the Admiral and ETF share classes of the same total stock market index essentially giving identical exposure. Correlation measures how often investments move together with one meaning they move almost in lockstep. When many holdings are highly correlated diversification benefits shrink during big market drops because everything falls at once. Overall this portfolio is intentionally centered on one broad index so some correlation is expected and not a problem by itself. However holding two wrappers of the same fund brings no real diversification advantage. Streamlining to one share class can simplify tracking and slightly reduce complexity without changing the actual market exposure.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

On a risk versus return basis this portfolio sits close to the efficient frontier for its chosen ingredients since it pairs a broad equity index with a cash‑like anchor. The “efficient frontier” is simply the mix that gives the best tradeoff between ups and downs for a given set of holdings. Within the current lineup optimization would mostly mean fine‑tuning how much sits in stocks versus the money market and cleaning up overlapping index exposures rather than adding complexity. Efficiency here is about squeezing the best risk‑return ratio out of what is already owned not about chasing maximum returns or perfect diversification. Regular check‑ins can keep it aligned with evolving comfort levels.

Dividends Info

  • Apple Inc 0.40%
  • CVS Health Corp 3.40%
  • Microsoft Corporation 0.70%
  • AT&T Inc 3.50%
  • Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund Investor Shares 4.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares 1.10%
  • Walmart Inc 0.80%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.76%

The total yield around 1.76% comes mainly from the broad index fund and the relatively high yield on the money market position with small contributions from the individual dividend stocks. This cash flow is modest but steady and fits a growth‑oriented approach where returns mostly come from price gains. Dividends can help smooth returns and provide optional income especially during sideways markets. Money market yields can move quickly as interest rates change so today’s level might not persist. If dependable income becomes a key goal later on it may be useful to revisit the balance between growth holdings and higher yielding options while keeping an eye on overall risk.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares 0.04%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.03%

Costs are impressively low with expense ratios of 0.03–0.04% on the index positions and a total TER around 0.03%. That is far below many active funds and strongly supports better long‑term performance because less money leaks out in fees each year. Think of expenses as a slow drip from a bucket over decades even small differences add up. This cost structure is a major strength and is very much in line with best practices for long‑term investing. The main focus from here does not need to be fee cutting but rather clarifying allocation goals and diversification since the fee side of the equation is already in excellent shape.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey