Income focused diversified portfolio balancing stability with value tilt and reduced volatility characteristics

Report created on Apr 10, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

The portfolio is built mainly from equity ETFs focused on dividends and quality, plus a sizable short-term bond allocation. About three-quarters sits in stocks, with the remaining quarter in 1–5 year USD bonds, giving a clear lean toward income and stability rather than aggressive growth. This mix matters because bonds and dividend-focused stocks typically smooth the ride when markets get rough. For a cautious risk score, the structure lines up well: meaningful equity exposure for growth, anchored by bonds for capital preservation. A general takeaway is that this kind of blend can work well for investors who want portfolio swings to feel manageable while still keeping long-term growth on the table.

Growth Info

Historically, $1,000 grew to about $2,496, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.61%. CAGR is like your “average yearly speed” over the whole journey, smoothing out the bumps. The portfolio lagged both the US market and global market, which is expected for a more conservative, dividend-tilted mix. In exchange, the worst drop (max drawdown) was about -28%, smaller than the roughly -34% falls seen in the benchmarks. That’s the trade-off: less upside in roaring bull markets but somewhat shallower pain in big selloffs. For a cautious orientation, this performance pattern is very consistent with the underlying design and is broadly in line with expectations.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection runs 1,000 simulated 15‑year paths based on historical volatility and correlations, then shows how $1,000 might grow. It finds a median outcome around $2,559, with most simulations landing between about $1,846 and $3,569. That’s roughly a 7.03% average annualized return across all paths, versus a lower assumed “cash-like” result. Monte Carlo is useful because it shows a range of outcomes, not just one straight line, and reminds you that markets rarely move smoothly. Still, it’s built from past data, which can change, so it’s a guide not a promise. For a cautious investor profile, the odds of a positive outcome look supportive of staying invested over long horizons.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    74%
  • Bonds
    26%

Asset allocation shows about 74% in stocks and 26% in bonds. For a conservative-leaning profile, that’s a relatively growth-friendly mix, but the equity sleeve is tilted toward dividend and quality strategies that typically behave more defensively than pure market trackers. The bond piece is in short-term USD bonds, which usually bring lower volatility and interest-rate sensitivity than long-term bonds. This setup gives three cushions: dividends, high-quality equities, and short-duration bonds. Compared with a plain global equity benchmark, the portfolio holds more fixed income and more income-focused stocks, which is aligned with a cautious risk label while still keeping long-term appreciation as a clear objective.

Sectors Info

  • Financials
    14%
  • Health Care
    12%
  • Technology
    9%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Utilities
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    7%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Telecommunications
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector exposure is nicely spread out, with no single area dominating. Financials, health care, technology, and industrials all sit in a fairly balanced range, and there’s meaningful exposure to utilities, consumer staples, and energy. Dividend and low‑volatility tilts typically bring more defensive sectors like utilities and staples, and that pattern appears here. In practical terms, this means the portfolio may hold up relatively better in economic slowdowns where needs-based spending and regulated industries are more stable, but it might lag in speculative rallies led by high‑growth sectors. Overall, the sector mix is well-balanced and aligns closely with broad market norms, which is a strong indicator of healthy diversification.

Regions Info

  • North America
    79%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, about 79% of equities sit in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and a small slice in emerging regions. This is less globally diversified than an all‑world benchmark, which usually has closer to 60% in the US. The upside is that the portfolio is anchored in one of the deepest and most transparent markets, which has historically delivered strong returns. The trade‑off is less exposure to different economic cycles and currencies, which could matter if US assets underperform other regions for a stretch. A key takeaway: this is a US‑centric but not US‑only setup, giving some global flavor without overwhelming the home base.

Market capitalization Info

  • Large-cap
    36%
  • Mega-cap
    19%
  • Mid-cap
    15%
  • Small-cap
    3%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

By market cap, the portfolio leans heavily into large and mega‑cap companies, with smaller allocations to mid and small caps. Large and mega caps are typically more established businesses with steadier earnings, which supports the income and lower‑volatility profile. Smaller companies often bring higher growth potential but also more pronounced ups and downs; here they are a relatively minor slice. This structure means returns will broadly track the behavior of big, mature firms rather than early‑stage or niche players. For risk management, that’s helpful: large caps usually hold up better in stress and offer deeper liquidity. The growth trade‑off is that explosive small‑cap rallies will be less impactful on overall performance.

True holdings Info

  • Broadcom Inc
    1.17%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • Johnson & Johnson
    1.07%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • Merck & Company Inc
    1.05%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
    1.02%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co
    0.91%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • Exxon Mobil Corp
    0.89%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • AbbVie Inc
    0.85%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
  • Chevron Corp
    0.73%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Nextera Energy Inc
    0.60%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Fidelity® MSCI Utilities Index ETF
  • Amgen Inc
    0.58%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 8.87%

Looking through the ETFs, the top underlying names include Broadcom, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, UnitedHealth, JPMorgan, and Exxon Mobil. All exposures come indirectly via funds, with no single company above roughly 1.2% of total value in this top-10 sample. That’s a nice sign of diversification at the stock level, even though coverage is limited to ETF top holdings. There will be some hidden overlap as the same large companies appear in multiple dividend and broad equity funds, but nothing here screams single-name risk. The main implication: risk is driven far more by broad style and sector exposures than by any one company, which generally supports a smoother experience.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
High
Data availability: 69%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 69%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Neutral
Data availability: 69%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
High
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
High
Data availability: 100%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure shows strong tilts toward value, yield, and low volatility, with other factors sitting near neutral. Factors are like “personality traits” of stocks that drive long‑term behavior. A high value tilt suggests more emphasis on companies trading at lower prices relative to fundamentals, which can do well after periods of market froth but may lag when investors chase high growth. High yield focus means a meaningful portion of return should come from dividends, supporting income goals but sometimes underweighting fast‑growing non‑payers. The high low‑volatility tilt aligns with the cautious risk score, aiming to reduce big swings. In choppy or sideways markets, this combination can be very comfortable to hold.

Risk contribution Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
    Weight: 19.00%
    26.3%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF
    Weight: 14.00%
    18.7%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    Weight: 13.00%
    17.6%
  • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 10.00%
    13.5%
  • Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 9.00%
    11.7%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 87.8%

Risk contribution data shows that the top three equity funds—iShares Core Dividend Growth, Schwab International Equity, and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity—collectively generate about 63% of total portfolio volatility, despite being less than half the total weight. Risk contribution measures how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ a lot from simple allocation percentages. Here, broad dividend and international equity funds are the main “volume knobs” for risk, while the bond and smaller sector positions play more of a stabilizing role. A practical takeaway: if an investor wanted to dial overall risk up or down, changes to these three funds would have the biggest impact on day‑to‑day fluctuations.

Redundant positions Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
    Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation
  • Schwab International Equity ETF
    Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

Several equity ETFs in this portfolio move very closely together: the main US dividend and dividend‑growth funds are highly correlated, as is the pair of international equity and international high‑dividend funds. Correlation describes how similarly assets move—highly correlated assets tend to rise and fall at the same time. That’s not inherently bad, especially when they’re broad, diversified funds; it just means that owning more of them doesn’t always add as much diversification as the fund count might suggest. The benefit here is simplicity and consistency: when markets move, these pieces generally respond in predictable ways. The trade‑off is that in equity drawdowns, several parts of the portfolio may decline together.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The efficient frontier analysis shows the current portfolio sitting right on or very close to the frontier, which means it’s using its existing holdings in an efficient way for its chosen risk level. The Sharpe ratio—return per unit of risk—of 0.48 is lower than the theoretical maximum Sharpe of 0.75 available with a riskier mix, but that’s expected because the optimal Sharpe portfolio uses higher volatility. There’s also a very low‑risk minimum variance option with a modestly higher Sharpe, but much lower expected return. The key message: for the cautious risk score, this allocation is already efficient; any changes would be about choosing a different comfort level with risk, not fixing an inefficiency.

Dividends Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF 2.00%
  • Fidelity® MSCI Industrials Index ETF 1.00%
  • Fidelity® MSCI Utilities Index ETF 2.40%
  • iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond 4.20%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.40%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 3.10%
  • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares 1.70%
  • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares 2.30%
  • Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares 3.50%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 3.07%

The overall yield around 3.07% is a key feature. Individual holdings like the bond fund (over 4%), US and international dividend ETFs (around 3–3.5%), and utilities help lift income above what a broad market index would usually deliver. Dividends matter because they provide a tangible cash return that can be reinvested for compounding or withdrawn for spending, regardless of short‑term price moves. For someone focused on income stability, this is a strong alignment: the portfolio’s structure and its historical yield profile point in the same direction. It’s worth remembering that yields can change with markets and interest rates, but the emphasis on dividend strategies supports a consistent income‑oriented approach.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF 0.08%
  • Fidelity® MSCI Industrials Index ETF 0.08%
  • Fidelity® MSCI Utilities Index ETF 0.08%
  • iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond 0.06%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares 0.06%
  • Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares 0.22%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.08%

Average total expense ratio (TER) is about 0.08%, which is impressively low for a portfolio using multiple specialized ETFs. TER is the annual fee charged by a fund, and while it looks tiny, the difference between 0.08% and, say, 0.5% compounds meaningfully over decades. Low costs mean more of the portfolio’s return stays in the investor’s pocket instead of going to fund providers. This allocation is well‑balanced and aligns closely with best practices on fee control, especially given the mix of domestic, international, sector, and factor‑tilted funds. In short, the cost structure is a genuine strength and provides a solid foundation for long‑term performance.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey