The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Growth Investors
This setup fits an investor who is comfortable with meaningful ups and downs in pursuit of higher long‑term growth. The ideal person has a long time horizon, often 10 years or more, and can mentally ride through sharp market drops without feeling forced to sell. Typical goals might include building wealth for retirement, funding future large expenses, or growing a legacy rather than drawing income today. Risk tolerance is above average: temporary losses of 30–40% would be viewed as painful but acceptable. This personality values low costs, broad diversification within stocks, and is okay with limited defensive assets in order to maximize equity exposure.
This portfolio is a pure stock mix with three broad ETFs and a clear growth tilt. Roughly half is tied to large US companies, about a third to smaller value-tilted US companies, and the rest to international stocks. Compared with a typical global market mix, this leans more heavily on the US and on small value stocks. That concentration matters because it can increase both long‑term growth potential and short‑term swings. This structure is generally well aligned with a growth profile, but you could soften volatility by adding some stabilizing assets such as bonds or cash-like holdings if needed, or by slightly increasing the share of broad global exposure.
Historically, this mix has delivered a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 16%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip: it smooths out all the ups and downs into one yearly number. That level of return is higher than what broad stock benchmarks have typically produced over long periods, which is impressive. At the same time, the portfolio has seen a maximum drawdown of around ‑38%, meaning at one point it dropped that much from a prior peak. This is normal for an all‑equity growth setup. It’s useful to check whether you’d be comfortable staying invested through similar drops.
The Monte Carlo analysis uses 1,000 simulated paths based on past behavior to estimate future outcomes. Think of it as running “what if” scenarios where returns are randomly shuffled within historical patterns. The results show a wide range: in the 5th percentile, wealth grows modestly, while the median and higher percentiles show very large gains. Most simulations end positive, and the average simulated annual return is similar to historical numbers. This is encouraging, but it’s crucial to remember simulations depend on past data and assumptions. They can’t predict future crises or regime changes, so it’s wise to treat them as rough guides rather than promises.
All of the invested money here sits in stocks, with no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternative assets. That creates a very clear growth orientation, which is great for maximizing long‑term upside but also means there’s no built‑in shock absorber when markets fall. Many broad benchmarks include at least some safer assets for stability, especially for shorter horizons. For someone truly focused on long‑term growth, a 100% stock approach can make sense, but it requires accepting large swings. If downside risk feels uncomfortable, you could gradually introduce a modest slice of lower‑volatility assets to smooth the ride without dramatically changing the growth focus.
Sector exposure is broad, spanning all major areas of the economy, with the largest weights in technology and financial services. This looks similar to common equity benchmarks, which is a positive sign for diversification. A tech tilt can boost growth but may also be more sensitive to changes in interest rates and market sentiment. Financials and cyclicals tend to do well in economic expansions but can struggle in recessions. The good news is that no single sector dominates to an extreme degree, and this balance supports resilience across different market environments. It’s useful to periodically check whether any sector grows so large that it starts to feel uncomfortable.
Geographically, the portfolio is strongly tilted toward North America, especially the US, with a smaller slice in international markets. This US‑heavy orientation has helped historically, as US stocks have outperformed many regions over the past decade. Common global benchmarks usually have a somewhat lower US share, so this is an intentional tilt. The trade‑off is that results become more tied to the health of the US economy and currency. Keeping a meaningful, though smaller, exposure to the rest of the world is a strength here, since different regions can lead at different times. If you want even broader diversification, gently boosting non‑US exposure could be one way to do that.
The market cap breakdown shows a healthy spread across company sizes: a core in mega and large companies, plus significant exposure to small and micro caps. Small and micro caps are generally more volatile but can offer higher growth and, in this case, a value tilt. That tilt means focusing on cheaper, more out‑of‑favor companies, which historically has sometimes delivered extra return but with bumpier ride. This blend is more aggressive than a typical large‑cap‑only index but better diversified across size than many portfolios. It’s worth checking that the extra swings that come with smaller companies fit your comfort level and time horizon before adding more.
The overall dividend yield of about 1.5% is modest, which is typical for a growth‑oriented equity portfolio. Dividend yield is simply the annual cash payout as a percentage of your investment; it can feel like rent coming in while you hold the property. The international sleeve contributes a slightly higher yield, while the US growth exposure offers lower payouts but more focus on reinvested profits. This structure fits an investor who is more interested in long‑term growth than in current income. If at some point you want more cash flow—say, in retirement—you might gradually add higher‑yielding holdings or shift part of the mix toward income‑focused strategies.
The total expense ratio (TER) of around 0.10% is impressively low for a diversified equity portfolio. TER is like an annual service fee charged by the funds; lower fees mean more of the market’s return stays in your pocket. Compared with many actively managed products, this cost level is very competitive and strongly supports long‑term performance. Costs are one of the few things investors can control, and this setup is already doing an excellent job here. The main thing is to keep an eye on any future changes in fund fees or trading habits so that overall costs remain this lean over time.
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
From a risk‑return standpoint, this portfolio sits on the aggressive side of the spectrum, leaning fully into stocks. The Efficient Frontier is a concept that maps the best possible trade‑offs between risk and return for a given set of assets. Within your current building blocks, there may be combinations that offer similar expected return with slightly lower volatility, often by adjusting the balance between large caps, small value, and international exposure. Efficiency here doesn’t mean “perfect” or “safest,” just the best ratio of potential reward to risk. Periodically re‑examining the mix using these ideas can help keep the portfolio aligned with your comfort level as life circumstances change.
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.