Globally diversified stock portfolio with a strong tilt toward technology and semiconductor growth

Report created on May 11, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is very simple and tightly focused: three equity ETFs with no bonds, cash, or alternatives. The core global equity ETF dominates at just over 88%, with a roughly 11% satellite position in a semiconductor ETF and a very small allocation to a hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF. This kind of “core plus satellite” setup matters because the core sets the overall behaviour, while the satellites nudge performance and risk in specific directions. Here, the satellites add a clear growth and tech flavour on top of a broad-market base. The structure is easy to understand and monitor, and the strong global core aligns well with widely used diversification standards.

Growth Info

Over the period from mid-2023 to early May 2026, £1,000 in this portfolio grew to about £1,807. That translates to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.87%, meaning the investment grew around 22–23% per year on average over the full stretch. That comfortably beat both the US market and a broad global market benchmark, which were in the high teens. The worst peak-to-trough fall was about -19.6%, similar to the benchmarks, and it recovered in roughly four months. This pattern suggests the portfolio captured strong upside while keeping downside broadly in line with major markets, though that balance can change in future.

Projection Info

The forward projection uses a Monte Carlo simulation, which basically means the system runs the portfolio’s historical returns and volatility through a thousand “what if” futures. Each simulation path shakes the returns slightly differently to build a range of possible outcomes. After 15 years, the median result is about £2,696 from £1,000, with a wide middle band between roughly £1,770 and £4,174. There’s also a small chance of ending near where you started or below. This shows that, even with an annualised projection around 7.9%, long-term outcomes can vary a lot, and past patterns may not fully repeat.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the portfolio is in stocks, so there is no built-in cushion from bonds or cash-like assets. Being 100% equity matters because shares tend to have higher expected returns over very long periods but also larger and more frequent swings along the way. Compared with a multi-asset mix that blends in bonds, this kind of structure will usually react more sharply to market shocks and recoveries. The strong global core ETF does spread this equity exposure broadly across regions and industries, which is a positive for diversification within stocks, but the overall asset-class mix remains firmly in the growth-oriented camp.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    38%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Industrials
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

From a sector view, technology stands out at 38% of the equity exposure, clearly above many broad global benchmarks. Financials, industrials, consumer discretionary, telecoms, and health care together make up most of the rest, with smaller slices in staples, energy, materials, utilities, and real estate. This tilt toward technology is reinforced by the dedicated semiconductor ETF, which adds cyclical and often more volatile names on top of the broad tech holdings. Tech-heavy portfolios can benefit strongly during periods of innovation and growth optimism, but they may feel more pressure when interest rates rise or when sentiment turns against high-growth business models.

Regions Info

  • North America
    67%
  • Europe Developed
    13%
  • Asia Developed
    7%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio leans heavily on North America at 67%, with additional exposure to developed Europe, developed Asia, Japan, and smaller allocations to emerging regions. This is broadly in line with many global equity indices, which are also dominated by North American markets. That alignment is helpful because it means the portfolio’s regional mix is close to global market capitalisation weights, supporting diversification across multiple economies. At the same time, returns will be especially influenced by what happens in North American markets and currencies, while the smaller slices in emerging regions and less represented areas will have a more muted impact.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    51%
  • Large-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    14%

By market capitalisation, the portfolio is tilted toward very large companies: about 51% in mega-caps and 34% in large-caps, with the remainder in mid-caps and very little, if any, in smaller companies. Larger firms tend to be more established, widely followed, and often more resilient than small, speculative names, which can reduce some extremes in volatility. However, it also means the portfolio’s behaviour is closely tied to the biggest global companies. This pattern is typical of major equity indices and provides a reasonably stable base, though it doesn’t lean into the higher-risk, higher-variability world of small-cap stocks.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    5.21%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
  • Apple Inc
    3.58%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Microsoft Corporation
    2.71%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.65%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.26%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    2.01%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    1.62%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    1.54%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.24%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
    1.24%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
  • Top 10 total 24.06%

Looking through to the underlying holdings, the top positions feature well-known global giants such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, Alphabet, and major semiconductor names like TSMC, Micron, and AMD. Several of these appear via more than one ETF, which creates overlapping exposure: for instance, a company held in both the global fund and the semiconductor ETF counts twice in terms of impact. Because only ETF top-10 holdings are used, overlap is likely understated. This overlap concentrates risk in a handful of big tech and chip companies, meaning their fortunes can drive portfolio results more than the raw ETF weights might suggest.

Risk contribution Info

  • Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution GBP
    Weight: 88.16%
    76.8%
  • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
    Weight: 11.24%
    22.4%
  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
    Weight: 0.60%
    0.8%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding adds to the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from its simple weight. The broad global ETF is 88% of the assets but contributes around 77% of the total risk, so it’s actually a bit less volatile than its size alone might imply. In contrast, the 11% semiconductor ETF contributes about 22% of the risk, meaning it punches above its weight. The tiny Nasdaq-100 position adds a little extra risk on top. This pattern of a modest satellite driving a large share of volatility is typical when using more specialised, concentrated growth funds.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The risk vs return analysis shows the current portfolio sitting on or very close to the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier is the curve of the best risk/return combinations you could get by just reweighting the existing holdings. The portfolio’s Sharpe ratio of 1.23 (a measure of return per unit of risk above the risk-free rate) is solid, though the max-Sharpe mix shows an even higher ratio at the cost of substantially more volatility. The minimum variance mix offers slightly lower risk with still decent returns. Overall, the current allocation is already using these three ETFs in a very efficient way.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) 0.35%
  • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF 0.35%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

Costs are notably low overall. The total TER of about 0.04% for the main holding is extremely competitive, while the two satellite ETFs each charge 0.35%. Because the satellites together make up a relatively small share of the portfolio, the blended cost across everything stays very modest. Low ongoing charges matter because they come off returns every year, and even small differences compound over long periods. In this case, the fee level supports better long-term performance by letting more of the gross returns stay in the portfolio. It’s a clear structural strength of this setup.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey