Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Equity portfolio with strong global core tilted toward technology and semiconductor growth themes

Report created on Jul 2, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a three‑ETF, 100% equity mix with a clear global structure. Around two‑thirds sits in a broad developed‑market global fund, which acts as the diversified core. Just under one‑sixth is in emerging markets, adding higher‑risk, higher‑potential regions. The remaining slice focuses specifically on semiconductors, creating a targeted growth tilt on top of the core. This simple structure makes the portfolio easy to understand and monitor. A concentrated three‑holding setup means every ETF meaningfully affects overall behaviour, both in returns and volatility. The design leans toward long‑term capital growth rather than defensive stability or income, which is consistent with its “balanced” risk score that still sits clearly on the equity side.

Growth Info

Over the observed period, a hypothetical €1,000 grew to about €1,944, implying a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) near 29.5%. CAGR is like average speed on a long trip, showing the smooth annualised pace of growth. This significantly outpaced both the US market and the broader global market by 8–9 percentage points per year, which is a large gap over multiple years. The maximum drawdown of roughly ‑20% shows that the portfolio did experience notable temporary losses, but it actually fell slightly less than both benchmarks. Only 26 days made up 90% of returns, underlining how a small number of strong days drove much of the performance. As always, this strong recent history cannot guarantee future results.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses historical patterns of returns and volatility to simulate many possible future paths for the portfolio. Think of it as running 1,000 “what if” market scenarios and seeing where the investment could end up. For a €1,000 starting amount over 15 years, the median outcome lands around €2,685, with a wide but plausible middle range between roughly €1,800 and €4,200. The very broad 5–95% range, from about €1,000 to €7,500, illustrates how uncertain long‑term equity outcomes can be. The average simulated annual return of about 7.9% is far lower than the recent realised performance, reminding that projections lean on more typical long‑run behaviour rather than the unusually strong recent period.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of this portfolio is in stocks, with no bonds, cash‑like instruments, or alternatives included. Equities are ownership stakes in companies and tend to offer higher long‑term growth potential than safer assets, but with more pronounced ups and downs. An all‑equity allocation usually means bigger swings in value during market stress compared with mixed stock‑bond portfolios. The global and emerging‑market funds provide broad equity diversification, spreading risk across many companies and industries. However, diversification works only within the stock universe here; there is no buffer from assets that typically behave differently, such as bonds. This all‑stock structure lines up with the balanced risk label but clearly leans toward growth rather than capital preservation.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    41%
  • Financials
    14%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector‑wise, the portfolio is clearly tilted toward technology at about 41% of equity exposure, well above what broad global benchmarks typically show. Financials, industrials, consumer sectors, telecom, and health care all appear with moderate weights, giving some diversification across different parts of the economy. Smaller slices in energy, basic materials, utilities, and real estate round out the picture. A tech‑heavy profile often benefits strongly during periods of innovation, digital adoption, and supportive interest‑rate conditions, but can be more sensitive when rates rise or when investors rotate toward more cyclical or defensive sectors. This overweight in technology is a core driver of both the strong recent performance and the potential for higher volatility compared with a more sector‑neutral global equity mix.

Regions Info

  • North America
    63%
  • Europe Developed
    12%
  • Asia Developed
    10%
  • Asia Emerging
    6%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%

Geographically, roughly 63% of the portfolio sits in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Asia, Japan, and smaller allocations to emerging regions like Latin America and Africa/Middle East. This North America share is broadly in line with many global equity benchmarks, which are also heavily US‑tilted due to market size. The additional emerging‑market ETF slightly increases exposure to faster‑growing, but generally more volatile, economies beyond the standard global index. This blend means the portfolio is meaningfully diversified across regions and currencies, while still being anchored in the large and liquid North American market. Currency moves and regional economic cycles will both influence returns, but the spread across continents reduces reliance on any single country.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    53%
  • Large-cap
    32%
  • Mid-cap
    14%

By company size, the portfolio is dominated by mega‑caps at about 53%, followed by large‑caps at 32% and a smaller 14% in mid‑caps. Mega‑caps are the very largest global companies, often with established business models, strong balance sheets, and wide geographic reach. Large‑caps share many of these traits but with slightly higher potential for company‑specific growth and risk. Mid‑caps can add some extra growth and idiosyncratic behaviour, since they are often more sensitive to business cycles and competition. This size mix is broadly consistent with standard global indices, which naturally lean heavily toward mega‑ and large‑caps. As a result, the portfolio’s volatility is driven largely by the biggest global names, which tend to be highly researched and widely traded.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    6.49%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    3.84%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Apple Inc.
    3.68%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Broadcom Inc
    3.07%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Microsoft Corporation
    2.55%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Amazon.com Inc
    2.10%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.79%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.78%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • SK Hynix Inc
    1.75%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    1.40%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
  • Top 10 total 28.45%

Looking through to the top underlying holdings, several big technology and semiconductor names stand out as repeated exposures. NVIDIA, Taiwan Semiconductor, Broadcom, Micron, and SK Hynix together form a sizeable slice, especially when combined with a dedicated semiconductor ETF. Large platform companies like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet also appear prominently. When the same company shows up in multiple ETFs, its influence on the portfolio can be larger than it first appears from each fund individually. The reported coverage only includes top‑10 ETF holdings, so actual overlap is likely higher. This hidden concentration means the portfolio’s fortunes are closely tied to a relatively narrow group of high‑growth, tech‑related global leaders.

Risk contribution Info

  • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
    Weight: 72.26%
    59.5%
  • Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
    Weight: 11.75%
    24.6%
  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
    Weight: 15.99%
    15.9%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding adds to overall ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the global core ETF is about 72% of the portfolio but contributes around 60% of the risk, meaning it is relatively stable per unit of weight. The semiconductor ETF, at only about 12% weight, contributes roughly 25% of total risk, more than double its share, signalling that it is the main volatility amplifier. The emerging‑markets fund’s risk share is almost exactly in line with its weight. This pattern highlights how a focused thematic position can materially shape the portfolio’s behaviour even when it occupies a minority allocation on paper.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The efficient frontier chart suggests this portfolio already sits on or very near the frontier for its set of holdings. The Sharpe ratio—a measure of risk‑adjusted return comparing extra return over a risk‑free rate to volatility—is about 1.47, close to the minimum‑variance option and reasonably near the optimal configuration. The “max Sharpe” version would target much higher return but at significantly higher risk, almost doubling volatility. The key takeaway is that, for this specific trio of ETFs, the current mix is making efficient use of risk. Reweighting could shift the balance toward either lower volatility or higher expected return, but it would be trading off one dimension of the risk/return equation, not correcting an obvious inefficiency.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C 0.18%
  • iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.20%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.17%

The total expense ratio (TER) for this mix is very low at about 0.17% per year, thanks to all three ETFs being inexpensive index‑tracking products. TER represents the annual fee charged by a fund as a percentage of assets; it quietly reduces returns each year, so small differences add up over decades. Here, costs are impressively low and compare well with typical global equity ETF ranges. That cost efficiency provides a solid foundation, as less performance is lost to fees, especially important for long‑term, buy‑and‑hold investing. In practical terms, low ongoing charges help more of any market gains stay in the portfolio, compounding over time rather than being paid out in management costs.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey