A low cost us focused stock portfolio emphasizing growth with moderate diversification and income tilt

Report created on Dec 18, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built almost entirely around broad US stocks, with a big core in a total market fund, an extra tilt toward a concentrated growth index, a slice of dividend payers, and a small international sleeve. It lines up reasonably well with a typical “balanced equity” benchmark, but it’s actually 100% in stocks rather than mixing in bonds or cash. That structure matters because it explains why returns look strong but swings can still be meaningful. If a smoother ride is desired, shifting a portion into defensive assets like high‑quality bonds or cash alternatives could reduce volatility while keeping the broad equity exposure largely intact.

Growth Info

Using a simple example, a $10,000 investment growing at a 14.58% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) would roughly double about every five years, which is very strong historically. CAGR is like average speed on a road trip: you ignore bumps and just see how fast you got from start to finish. The max drawdown of about -26% shows that at one point, the portfolio fell more than a quarter from a peak, which is typical for an all‑stock mix. That kind of drop is uncomfortable but not extreme. It’s important to remember that past performance, no matter how good, does not guarantee anything about future returns.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which ran 1,000 simulations and assumes patterns based on historical data, shows a wide range of possible futures. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if” machine, randomly shaking returns thousands of times to see different paths your money could take. The median outcome around 465% means $10,000 could hypothetically grow to about $56,500, while the 5th percentile at 87.1% shows even weak scenarios still hover near break‑even. These numbers are encouraging, but they rely on history behaving somewhat similarly to the future. Treat them as rough weather forecasts, not promises, and consider if you’d be comfortable with outcomes on both the high and low ends.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the invested money sits in one asset class: stocks. That explains the strong growth potential but also why the portfolio can drop sharply when markets fall. A “moderately diversified” label here applies mostly within stocks, not across different asset types like bonds, real estate, or cash. Many broad benchmarks that target a balanced risk profile blend stocks with some stabilizing assets to cushion downturns. If the goal is to stay closer to a truly balanced risk experience, introducing even a modest slice of bonds or other defensive holdings could improve overall stability without completely sacrificing the potential for long‑term growth.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    33%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    7%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

The sector mix is tilted toward technology at 33%, with financials, communication services, healthcare, and industrials making up much of the rest. This looks broadly in line with modern US equity benchmarks, which are naturally tech‑heavy, and that alignment supports solid diversification across the economy. The extra growth tilt from the NASDAQ 100 style ETF likely amplifies tech sensitivity, which can mean bigger moves when interest rates change or investor sentiment shifts toward or away from growth companies. This structure is fine if higher volatility in exchange for potentially higher long‑term returns is acceptable, but trimming the growth tilt slightly would smooth sector risk.

Regions Info

  • North America
    89%
  • Europe Developed
    7%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%

Geographically, about 89% is in North America, with only a small slice in developed markets overseas and almost nothing in emerging regions. This is very close to how many US investors naturally allocate, and it has worked well during the last decade when US markets outperformed many global peers. That said, it does leave outcomes heavily dependent on the health of the US economy and policy environment. Adding more non‑US exposure can spread political, currency, and economic risk across a wider base. Even modest adjustments to increase international exposure would enhance diversification without radically changing the core US‑centric stance.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    41%
  • Large-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

The portfolio leans strongly toward mega and large companies, with about 76% in mega and big caps, and the rest in medium, small, and a tiny slice of micro caps. This is very similar to broad market benchmarks and is a good sign of healthy internal diversification. Larger companies usually bring more stability and better liquidity, while the mid and small‑cap exposure can contribute an extra growth kick over long periods, albeit with higher short‑term swings. If the goal is steadier behavior, the current weight toward big names already supports that; if more aggressive growth is desired, slightly increasing smaller company exposure could be considered, while understanding the added volatility.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk‑return perspective, this portfolio sits in an interesting place: historically high returns, but with all‑equity volatility. The Efficient Frontier is a concept that shows the best possible trade‑offs between risk and return using only the existing building blocks, adjusting just their weights. “Efficiency” here means getting the most expected return for each unit of risk, not achieving every goal like maximum income or perfect diversification. Based on the current holdings, slightly reducing the aggressive growth tilt and adding more of the broader, diversified core fund—or a stabilizing asset class if allowed—could move the mix closer to that efficient line, smoothing the ride without abandoning strong return potential.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • SCHWAB INTERNATIONAL INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES 2.60%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.74%

The overall dividend yield of about 0.74% is modest, especially given the strong growth tilt. That’s because the NASDAQ 100 style component pays very little, while the dividend ETF and international fund add most of the income. Dividends are simply regular cash payments from companies, and for many investors they help generate a baseline of returns even in flat markets. Here, the structure is clearly growth‑first, income‑second. That’s perfectly reasonable for long time horizons. If steady cash flow is important, increasing the share of dividend‑focused or higher‑yield holdings could raise the income stream, but it might mean less exposure to high‑growth companies.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • SCHWAB INTERNATIONAL INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES 0.06%
  • SCHWAB TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND SELECT SHARES 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

The total cost (TER, or Total Expense Ratio) of around 0.06% is impressively low, especially given the mix of broad and specialized funds. TER is essentially the annual “membership fee” you pay for being in the fund, and keeping it low is one of the few things fully within your control. This allocation is well‑balanced on the cost side and aligns closely with global standards for efficient, low‑fee investing. Over decades, shaving even a fraction of a percent off fees can translate into thousands of extra dollars. There’s no strong need to push costs lower; the current fee level already supports strong long‑term performance.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey