Balanced cautious portfolio using stocks bonds and gold with a clear tilt to small value

Report created on Apr 6, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

The portfolio is built from five ETFs: broad US stocks, broad international stocks, long‑term Treasuries, gold, and a dedicated U.S. small‑cap value fund. Roughly 60% sits in stocks, 20% in bonds, and 20% in “no data,” which here is mainly gold. That mix gives a meaningful growth engine from equities while adding ballast from bonds and a diversifier from gold. For a cautious risk score, this is a thoughtful structure: it doesn’t chase maximum return but aims to smooth the ride. The main takeaway is that the core design already matches a conservative, diversified, multi‑asset approach rather than a single‑bet equity portfolio.

Growth Info

From mid‑2021 to early‑2026, $1,000 grew to about $1,569, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) near 10%. CAGR is like average speed on a road trip: it smooths out all the bumps. You slightly lagged the U.S. market but beat the global market, which is a solid outcome given you’re taking less risk than a pure‑equity U.S. index. The worst drop (max drawdown) was about −23%, a bit shallower than the U.S. benchmark, which fits the cautious label. The key lesson: you’ve captured most of equity‑like returns while shaving off some downside, which is exactly what a diversified, risk‑aware mix aims for.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection runs 1,000 simulations to see how $1,000 might grow over 15 years, using past return and volatility patterns randomly shuffled. Think of it as rolling dice many times based on historical behavior, not as a prediction. The median outcome is about $2,387, with a broad “likely” range from roughly $1,744 to $3,216. There’s around a 70% chance of ending above your starting amount. Importantly, some scenarios are much weaker and some much stronger, showing real uncertainty. The main lesson: even with a cautious, diversified portfolio, outcomes can vary a lot, so planning should focus on ranges and probabilities, not a single forecast number.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    60%
  • No data
    20%
  • Bonds
    20%

Asset‑class‑wise, about 60% is in stocks, 20% in bonds, and 20% is “no data,” which here primarily reflects gold. Stocks are your main growth driver, bonds help stabilize and provide income, and gold adds a diversifier that often behaves differently from both. Many global benchmarks sit closer to 100% stocks, so this mix is noticeably more conservative. For a cautious profile, this is well‑aligned and helps justify the high diversification score. The key takeaway: the combination of equities plus two defensive sleeves (bonds and gold) should, in many environments, smooth volatility more than an all‑stock portfolio, even if it slightly reduces long‑run expected returns.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    12%
  • Financials
    11%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    7%
  • Health Care
    5%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Real Estate
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector exposure across equities is quite balanced: technology, financials, and industrials are the biggest slices, but none dominates excessively. Technology is meaningful yet not overwhelming, while areas like health care, consumer sectors, energy, and telecom also show up in moderate weights. Compared with common broad‑market mixes, this looks close to benchmark‑style sector diversification, which is a strong positive. That balance helps avoid tying your fate to one economic theme, like growth tech or cyclical industries. The takeaway: this sector spread should help reduce the risk that a single sector shock derails performance, while still allowing you to benefit if any one area goes through a strong period.

Regions Info

  • North America
    41%
  • Europe Developed
    7%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, there’s a clear home‑bias toward North America at about 41%, with smaller allocations to developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and emerging regions. Global equity benchmarks typically have a larger share in North America, so being at 41% within equities is actually more balanced than many U.S.‑only portfolios. Having exposure to Europe, Japan, and emerging markets means you’re not fully dependent on one economy or central bank. That said, non‑U.S. regions are still relatively modest slices, so local developments in the U.S. will matter a lot. Overall, this geographic spread is sensibly diversified and aligns well with global standards for a cautious investor.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    20%
  • Large-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    10%
  • Mid-cap
    8%
  • Micro-cap
    7%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Across market capitalizations, you have exposure from mega‑caps down to micro‑caps, with especially notable allocations to small and micro companies. This is partly driven by the dedicated U.S. small‑cap value ETF, which boosts the size tilt. Smaller companies often have higher growth potential but more volatility, like younger businesses that can surprise on the upside or downside. Mega‑caps tend to be more stable and widely followed. The good news is that you’re not locked into just giants: different company sizes can respond differently to economic cycles. The practical takeaway: size diversification can enhance long‑term returns, though it may add some bumpiness in equity performance along the way.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    1.55%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Apple Inc
    1.47%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Microsoft Corporation
    1.10%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Amazon.com Inc
    0.76%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    0.69%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    0.68%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Broadcom Inc
    0.57%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.54%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    0.53%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Tesla Inc
    0.43%
    Part of fund(s):
    • LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
    • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 8.32%

Looking through ETF top holdings, there’s notable exposure to the big U.S. names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla. These appear mainly through the broad U.S. and international stock funds, creating some overlap: the same company can show up in multiple ETFs. Overlap isn’t bad, but it can create hidden concentration if certain giants dominate global markets. Because only top‑10 holdings are counted, the true overlap is likely higher. The practical takeaway is that while the portfolio looks highly diversified at the fund level, a chunk of your equity risk is still tied to the fortunes of a handful of very large technology‑driven companies.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
High
Data availability: 60%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
High
Data availability: 60%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 60%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Neutral
Data availability: 60%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 100%

Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.

Factor exposure shows clear tilts toward value (67%) and smaller size (64%), while momentum, quality, yield, and low volatility sit around neutral. Factors are characteristics like “cheap vs. expensive” (value) or “big vs. small” (size) that research links to long‑term returns. A high value tilt means more exposure to companies priced lower relative to fundamentals; historically this has sometimes outperformed but can lag during growth‑stock booms. The size tilt adds smaller firms, which can outperform over long horizons but swing more short‑term. Because other factors are roughly market‑like, the main behavioral pattern here is “small value.” Expect periods of tracking error versus broad indexes when value or small‑caps are out of favor.

Risk contribution Info

  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 25.00%
    30.6%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 20.00%
    22.8%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
    Weight: 15.00%
    22.1%
  • iShares® Gold Trust Micro
    Weight: 20.00%
    14.5%
  • iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
    Weight: 20.00%
    10.0%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives overall ups and downs, which can differ from its simple weight. Your three equity funds together make up 60% of the portfolio but contribute over 75% of total risk, with the small‑cap value ETF especially punchy relative to its 15% weight. In contrast, gold and long Treasuries are 40% of assets but only about a quarter of the risk, meaning they really do dampen volatility. This is actually a good structure for a cautious investor: growth assets dominate return and risk, while diversifiers soften shocks. If you ever wanted an even smoother ride, trimming the riskier equity slice would be more impactful than touching bonds or gold.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the efficient frontier chart, your current mix has a Sharpe ratio of 0.44, below both the minimum‑variance portfolio (0.52) and the optimal max‑Sharpe mix (1.25). The Sharpe ratio measures risk‑adjusted return, like “miles per gallon” for volatility. At your current risk level, the portfolio sits about 5 percentage points below the frontier, meaning that, in theory, rearranging weights among these same five ETFs could improve the balance between risk and return. The encouraging part: you already have good building blocks; efficiency could be boosted with reweighting rather than adding new products. Still, remember this is based on past data, which may not describe future market behavior perfectly.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.40%
  • iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 4.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.20%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.00%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.93%

The overall estimated yield is about 1.93%, coming from a mix of equity dividends and bond interest. The long‑term Treasury ETF is the highest‑yielding component around 4.1%, followed by the international equity fund at 3%, while the U.S. stock and small‑cap value funds yield closer to 1–1.4%. Yield is the cash income you receive, separate from price changes, and can matter for investors who like regular payouts. In this portfolio, income is modest but not negligible, with most of the long‑run growth expected from capital appreciation rather than big cash flows. The upside: you’re not stretching into very high‑yield, higher‑risk assets just to chase income.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • iShares® Gold Trust Micro 0.09%
  • iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%

The weighted expense ratio is roughly 0.10%, which is impressively low for a portfolio with multiple funds and a factor tilt. The broad Vanguard equity ETFs are extremely cheap, and even the small‑cap value and bond funds are reasonably priced. Costs compound just like returns: every 0.1% you avoid each year is money that stays invested. Over decades, lower fees can add up to a noticeable difference in ending wealth. The main takeaway: from a cost perspective, this setup is very efficient and aligned with best practices, giving you more room to keep whatever returns the market delivers rather than losing them to fund expenses.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey