Roast mode 🔥

A so called balanced portfolio that is actually an all equity growth rocket in a business suit

Report created on Dec 14, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This “balanced” masterpiece is 100% equities with a giant 70% blob in one global ETF then random hot sauce on top. Calling this balanced is like calling a sports car a family van because it has four seats. The big core position is sensible, but then you bolt on 12% semiconductors 10% small caps and 8% Alphabet like you got bored and chased whatever looked shiny. For a truly balanced setup there would normally be some stabilizers like bonds or defensive assets. If stability is a goal cutting the satellite bets or adding a genuine safety bucket would make this look less like a growth fund cosplaying as balanced.

Growth Info

Historically this thing has ripped: a 15.21% CAGR means £10k would hypothetically have become around £40k over ten years if that rate held, which is basically stock-market-on-steroids territory. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) is just the “average speed” of your portfolio over time. Max drawdown of -20.87% is relatively tame for such an aggressive setup, which almost feels suspiciously kind. But remember past data is like yesterday’s weather: useful vibes but not a forecast. Before getting too smug, assume it can easily drop 30–50% in a real crisis. Stress testing personal finances for that kind of hit would be smarter than just admiring the pretty past returns.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation result screaming a 21.94% annualized return across scenarios is… optimistic, to put it nicely. Monte Carlo is basically a financial dice game: thousands of alternate futures rolled using past volatility and returns. The median outcome of roughly 993% growth looks like someone fed the model too much caffeine. Also, 991 out of 1,000 simulations positive? Cute, but real markets do not sign that kind of contract. Simulations are only as honest as the inputs and usually assume markets behave better than they actually do in panics. It would be healthier to mentally haircut those projections hard and check if life goals still work with much duller numbers.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset classes: 100% stocks. Bonds: 0%. Cash: 0%. Anything remotely calming: also 0%. For something labeled “Profile_Balanced” this is more like “Profile_SendIt.” Stocks are growth engines but also drama queens in a crash; having nothing else is fine if the plan is long-term wealth building and emotional steel, not fine if sleep or short-term safety matter. A typical balanced mix would have a meaningful slice in bonds or similar to cushion the bad years. If stability or known future cash needs exist, carving out a boring bucket in safer stuff would make this look less like an all-or-nothing bet on global capitalism behaving nicely.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    34%
  • Financials
    13%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • No data
    8%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%

Sector-wise this is a tech-flavoured market smoothie with 34% in Technology plus another boost from Alphabet and chip exposure. Financials 13% and Industrials 9% keep it from being a pure gadget cult, but still: tech addiction detected. In good times, this is fun; in a rate spike or regulatory squeeze, less so. Overweighting one theme is like building a house mostly out of glass because the view is great. It works until hailstones show up. Dialling back the theme bets and leaning more on broad market exposure would keep growth potential while avoiding a meltdown every time the central bank clears its throat.

Regions Info

  • North America
    70%
  • Europe Developed
    13%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Developed
    5%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, it’s “America or bust” with North America at 70%. That mostly means US megacaps ruling the show, sprinkled with token amounts of Europe, Japan and emerging markets to look cultured. To be fair, the US has earned its weight with strong companies and innovation, but it also means heavy exposure to one political system, one currency and one set of regulators. If the US sneezes, this portfolio catches flu. A more balanced global spread would reduce the “one-country-is-my-entire-personality” risk, especially for someone in the UK whose real-life job, housing and currency already pile on regional exposure.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    38%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    16%
  • No data
    8%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

Market cap mix is actually one of the more grown-up parts: 38% Mega, 31% Big, and then a tail of Medium and Small boosted by that 10% small-cap ETF. So you get the big stable brands plus a side quest in smaller companies that can move like meme stocks on energy drinks. That small-cap tilt adds long-term growth potential but also more noise in bad markets. Market cap just means company size by stock value — giants vs. scrappy underdogs. The balance isn’t crazy, but pairing this extra small-cap spice with an already all-equity setup is like ordering the hot wings after the vindaloo.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk–return efficiency scale this portfolio is more “full throttle” than “optimized craft.” Efficient Frontier is just the idea of the best trade-off: max return for each level of risk, not fantasy high return with low risk. Here, risk score 4/7 with 100% equity and added tilts in chips and small caps suggests you’re pushing aggressively for upside without adding much true diversification. You’re basically paying in volatility for extra growth that’s not guaranteed. A more efficient setup might either trim the spicy tilts for similar returns with less drama, or accept even more risk in a more intentional, clearly goal-linked way instead of this half-balanced illusion.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
  • iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.35%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.21%

Costs are the one area where this thing actually behaves like an adult. A total TER of 0.21% is low enough that it barely nibbles at returns. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the annual fee for holding the funds, like a quiet subscription charge. For once, nothing outrageous here — you clearly avoided the “2% fee because the brochure was shiny” trap. Still, don’t relax too much: tiny fee differences compound over decades. Keeping this cheap mindset while resisting the urge to sprinkle on expensive niche products would protect long-term growth far more than any clever market timing story.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey