Roast mode 🔥

A growth chaser portfolio that forgot diversification is supposed to reduce panic not amplify it

Report created on Dec 16, 2025

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This setup is basically “US stocks with a personality disorder.” Forty percent in a broad US index sounds normal, then it veers hard into mid-cap momentum and small-cap value like it’s trying every style factor at once. You’ve got 100% stocks, heavy tilts to momentum and value, and zero chill. Versus a plain vanilla global stock index, this is spicier and more concentrated, with more moving parts than you probably need. That means bigger swings, more tracking error, and more chances to second-guess everything. If this structure sticks around, it needs a clearly stated plan: why these tilts, what role they play, and how long they’ll be left alone.

Growth Info

Historically, this thing has been on a heater: a CAGR of 16.8% is “did I just outsmart Wall Street?” territory. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) is basically your average speed over the trip, ignoring every pothole. And the pothole here was a max drawdown of almost -37%, which is “check my account three times a day” pain. Also, 90% of returns arrived in just 20 days, meaning miss a handful of big up days and the story looks way uglier. Versus a standard global equity index, this looks juiced, but don’t get attached. Past performance is yesterday’s weather: useful vibes, terrible crystal ball.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results are screaming “lottery ticket with a helmet.” Monte Carlo just means simulating thousands of random futures based on past behavior, like rolling the same loaded dice over and over. Median outcome of +660% and a fat 17.98% simulated annual return is wild, but the 5th percentile at just 73% shows there’s still room for the sad-trombone scenario. The danger is treating these simulations like destiny; they’re just math fan fiction based on historical swings. This setup deserves a reality check: plan for a future where returns are lower and drawdowns still show up. Build expectations around that, not the fantasy line.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

Asset classes: all stocks, all the time, no seatbelt. That’s bold for a growth profile with a risk score of 5/7, but it’s also a bit one-note. Asset classes are basically food groups for portfolios; you picked “protein only” and skipped carbs, veggies, and fiber. No bonds, no cash buffer, no diversifiers means every hit is taken straight to the face. When markets rip, you’ll look brilliant. When they tank, there’s nowhere to hide and nothing stable to rebalance from. If the goal isn’t full-throttle volatility, consider adding at least one “boring” asset bucket to keep this from being an all-or-nothing roller coaster.

Sectors Info

  • Financials
    20%
  • Technology
    20%
  • Industrials
    17%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Energy
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Telecommunications
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector mix actually looks strangely reasonable for something this aggressive: financials and tech at 20% each, with decent doses of industrials and cyclicals. But under the hood, momentum and small value tilts can secretly crank those sector weights around over time. Sector exposure is like a playlist: right now it’s a decent mix, but your factor choices mean the DJ might suddenly decide you’re at a metal concert mid-set. Compared with a broad global index, this can wander more into cyclicals and economically sensitive names. Keep an eye on whether those factor tilts are quietly overloading on any one storyline, especially in frothy markets.

Regions Info

  • North America
    78%
  • Europe Developed
    13%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, this is basically “USA or very strong supporting characters.” About 78% in North America with the rest tossed to developed markets like Europe and Japan is classic home bias. Home bias just means over-favoring your own market because it feels familiar, like only eating at chains you recognize when traveling. It’s not catastrophic here, but it does lean heavily on US policy, US valuations, and US currency risk. The international exposure is at least not embarrassing, but emerging markets are basically ghosted. If true global balance matters, bump the non-US side and especially broaden beyond just developed markets.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    25%
  • Mid-cap
    25%
  • Small-cap
    22%
  • Large-cap
    18%
  • Micro-cap
    9%

The size mix is where this portfolio really flexes the “I like drama” muscle: only 25% mega cap, with the rest spread across big, mid, small, and even 9% micro caps. Market cap is just company size; micro caps are the tiny bar bands, megacaps are stadium acts. That much in the smaller stuff means more volatility, more noise, and stronger reactions to economic shifts. Versus a standard market-cap-weighted index, this is clearly tilted toward the scrappy underdogs. That’s fine if the stomach lining is reinforced, but it needs a long time horizon and a strict rule against panicking when small caps go through their inevitable ugly phases.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk-return efficiency scale, this looks like a portfolio that sprinted straight toward returns and only glanced at risk in passing. “Efficient” just means best return for a given level of pain, not magical high return with no pain. Here, the drawdown history and all-equity stance suggest you’re probably sitting to the right of a more balanced alternative: more risk than strictly needed for only slightly higher expected return. The Monte Carlo numbers look heroic, but that’s based on a very strong historical run; dial that down and this might look like overkill. This setup deserves a review of whether the extra volatility tax is actually worth paying.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 3.30%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 1.60%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF 0.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.39%

Yield at 1.39% is “nice to have, not life-changing,” which is normal for a growth-tilted equity-only setup. Dividends are like slow drip coffee for investors: small, steady flows instead of betting everything on price jumps. Here, the yield isn’t high enough to cushion major drawdowns or meaningfully fund withdrawals anytime soon. It’s basically a side character. The danger would be pretending this is an “income” portfolio when it’s clearly built for capital growth and volatility. If steady cash flow ever becomes a real goal, this template would need a serious rework toward higher-payout, more stable holdings instead of factor-heavy growth chasers.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 0.36%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF 0.34%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.19%

Costs are the surprisingly responsible part of this circus. A total TER of 0.19% is solid, especially given the factor flavoring and active-ish tilts via Avantis and Invesco. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is just the annual fee haircut on your money; under 0.20% is quietly efficient for something this customized. You basically avoided the “2% fee for vibes” trap. That said, you are paying more than a single plain index ETF would charge for the privilege of being fancy. Make sure those extra basis points earn their keep by sticking with the strategy long enough for any factor tilts to actually matter.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey