Balanced global growth portfolio with strong momentum tilt and targeted thematic satellites
Report created on Mar 23, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 60.00% -
PP iShares Physical Gold ETC EUR
PPFB - IE00B4ND3602 13.40% -
SE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
SEC0 - IE000I8KRLL9 13.30% -
5J iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
5J50 - IE000U9ODG19 13.30%
The structure is very clear: roughly 60% in a broad global equity ETF, about 27% split between two focused thematic equity ETFs, and around 13% in gold. That core‑satellite setup is a common way to mix broad diversification with a few targeted tilts. The broad global fund behaves as the “engine room,” while the semiconductor and aerospace & defence ETFs introduce extra growth and risk. Gold acts as a diversifier and potential shock absorber. Overall, this is more growth‑oriented than defensive, but still has a stabilizing component. The Portfolio Risk Score of 4/7 and “Balanced” label fit a moderate‑to‑growth stance rather than something ultra‑aggressive or very conservative.
Growth
Over the short available period, €1,000 grew to €1,348, giving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 33.31%. CAGR is the average yearly growth rate, like the average speed of a car over a journey. That clearly outpaced both the US market (about 19.9% CAGR) and the global market (22.1% CAGR). At the same time, the max drawdown — the worst peak‑to‑trough drop — was only ‑6.65%, slightly higher than the benchmarks’ roughly ‑5.5%. The fact that 90% of returns came in just 15 days shows returns were concentrated in a few strong bursts. This strong recent run is encouraging but heavily influenced by momentum; past returns over less than a year aren’t a reliable guide to the future.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses the limited recent return pattern to simulate many possible 10‑year paths for a €1,000 investment. In simple terms, it takes the observed volatility and average return, then “shuffles” them thousands of times to see a range of outcomes. Here it produced extremely high median and upper‑percentile numbers and an annualised simulated return above 50%, which is unrealistically optimistic by long‑term historical standards. The warning about having fewer than two years of data is crucial: with such a short, strong recent history, simulations tend to extrapolate a hot streak. These projections are best seen as a stress‑test of volatility patterns, not as a realistic forecast of future wealth.
Asset classes
- Stocks 87%
- Other 13%
Asset‑class exposure is simple: roughly 87% in stocks and 13% in “other,” which is gold. That means growth assets clearly dominate, with gold providing a modest hedge rather than a full stabiliser. A balanced approach like this typically aims for long‑term capital growth while still keeping a shock absorber to help during equity sell‑offs. The presence of gold is a positive diversifier because it often moves differently from stocks, especially in crises or inflationary surprises. However, overall risk will still feel very equity‑driven: big stock market swings will largely define portfolio ups and downs, and gold’s role is more about cushioning than fully offsetting those moves.
Sectors
- Technology 29%
- Industrials 20%
- Financials 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 6%
- Telecommunications 5%
- Health Care 5%
- Consumer Staples 3%
- Basic Materials 2%
- Energy 2%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector exposure is notably tilted toward technology at 29%, with industrials close behind at 20%. Financial services at 10%, consumer cyclicals at 6%, and a mix of communication services, healthcare, and consumer defensive make up diversified smaller slices. This pattern reflects the thematic satellites: semiconductors push tech higher, while aerospace & defence lifts industrials. Compared to broad global benchmarks that are usually tech‑heavy but less concentrated in one or two industries, this portfolio leans more on sectors tied to innovation and defence spending. That tilt can work very well when demand and budgets are strong but may increase volatility during tech slowdowns, regulatory shifts, or defence‑related policy changes.
Regions
- North America 55%
- Europe Developed 14%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Japan 4%
- Asia Emerging 4%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Australasia 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, about 55% is in North America, 14% in developed Europe, and around 15% combined across developed Asia, Japan, and emerging Asia. Smaller slices go to Africa/Middle East, Australasia, and Latin America. This is quite close to common global equity benchmarks, which are typically dominated by North America but still spread across multiple regions. That alignment is a real strength: it reduces the risk of betting heavily on any single country or region, and it lets global economic growth drive returns. Being broadly in line with world market weights also means fewer big active regional calls to second‑guess over time, which can make it easier to stay invested through volatility.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 38%
- Large-cap 33%
- Mid-cap 14%
- Small-cap 1%
Market‑cap exposure is clearly tilted toward the largest companies: 38% mega‑cap and 33% big‑cap, with mid‑caps around 14% and only 1% in small caps. That’s similar to broad global indices, which are also dominated by large firms, but the added thematic ETFs push further into some of the biggest names in tech and industrials. Large and mega‑caps tend to be more stable and liquid than smaller companies, which can reduce idiosyncratic risk from any single stock blow‑up. On the flip side, the portfolio captures less of the potential long‑term “small‑cap premium,” where smaller companies sometimes grow faster but with bumpier rides.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.46%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AA Apple Inc 2.35%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.94%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.84%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 1.78%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.23%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.11%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GE GE Aerospace 1.02%
Part of fund(s):- iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.00%
Part of fund(s):- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AS ASML Holding N.V. 1.00%
Part of fund(s):- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
- Top 10 total 16.72%
Looking through the ETFs’ disclosed top holdings, the largest underlying exposures are familiar global giants like NVIDIA, Apple, TSMC, Broadcom, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and ASML. NVIDIA alone is around 3.5% of the total portfolio, and chips‑related names appear several times across funds. That points to hidden concentration in a handful of large technology and semiconductor companies, even though there’s no single‑stock position. Because the look‑through only covers ETF top‑10 holdings, the true overlap is probably somewhat higher. It’s not inherently bad to have these leaders as big drivers, but it does mean portfolio behaviour is more tied to a narrow group of growth names than the fund list alone suggests.
Factors
Factor exposure shows a strong tilt toward momentum (about 63%) and a meaningful size factor exposure (20%), with lower average signal coverage overall. Factors are like the underlying “personality traits” of investments — momentum captures recent winners, and size relates to smaller versus larger companies. A high momentum tilt often boosts returns when trends persist, as strong performers keep outperforming. But it can hurt during sharp reversals, when yesterday’s leaders suddenly lag. The relatively modest coverage on other factors like value, quality, low volatility, and yield suggests the portfolio is not strongly anchored in defensive or income‑oriented styles. Expect performance to be more sensitive to sentiment around growth and recent winners.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 60.00% 51.6% -
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
Weight: 13.30% 27.3% -
iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Weight: 13.30% 13.6% -
iShares Physical Gold ETC EUR
Weight: 13.40% 7.6%
Risk contribution looks at how much each holding adds to overall volatility, which can differ from its weight. Here, the broad global ETF is 60% of the portfolio but contributes about 52% of total risk, so it’s actually slightly less risky than its size suggests. The semiconductor ETF stands out: at 13.3% weight it contributes over 27% of risk, more than double its share. That’s the classic pattern of a concentrated, volatile growth theme. Aerospace & defence is more in line with its weight, while gold adds less risk than its allocation, helping to dampen swings. This pattern is normal for a core‑plus‑satellites portfolio but does mean semiconductor exposure is the main risk lever.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits on the efficient frontier, meaning that for its mix of holdings, the weights are already very efficient. The Sharpe ratio — return per unit of risk — is solid at 2.42, higher than the minimum‑variance portfolio’s 2.05. However, it’s not the absolute optimal point; a different weighting of the same holdings could raise the Sharpe ratio further or significantly increase expected return at the same or higher risk levels. For example, the highest‑Sharpe and same‑risk optimized portfolios project much higher returns but with meaningfully more volatility. So the current mix is already strong and efficient, but there is room, in theory, to dial risk and return up or down using the same building blocks.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc 0.35%
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.16%
The ongoing product costs are impressively low. The global core ETF charges 0.19%, and the semiconductor ETF 0.35%, leading to an overall estimated total expense ratio around 0.16%. That’s excellent for a portfolio with both a broad global core and targeted thematic exposure. Lower costs are powerful because they compound year after year — every 0.1% saved is money that stays invested and can grow. From a cost perspective, this setup aligns very well with best practices in evidence‑based investing. It means more of the portfolio’s gross return is likely to end up in the investor’s pocket instead of being eroded by fees, especially over multi‑decade horizons.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey