This portfolio has only about 1.6 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Get this analysis for your own portfolio Paste your holdings — the first report is free and takes about a minute. Analyze mine

Diversified global equity portfolio with balanced size tilts and strong recent results over a short history

Report created on Aug 11, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a simple three-fund, all‑equity mix. Around 70% sits in a broad global equity ETF, 20% in a global small-cap value ETF, and 10% in an emerging markets ETF. So it combines a core global stock market holding with two more adventurous “satellite” positions. Everything is in stocks, with no bonds or cash included in the analysis. This structure is easy to understand and monitor, which is helpful for staying consistent over time. The tilt toward small caps and emerging markets adds potential for higher long‑term growth but usually comes with bumpier short‑term moves. Because the funds are all from one provider, processes and style are likely to be consistent across the portfolio.

Growth Info

Over roughly 1.6 years, €1,000 grew to about €1,275, implying a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15.94%. CAGR is like the average yearly “speed” of growth over the whole period. Over this short window, the portfolio outpaced both the US market and the global market by a few percentage points per year. The largest peak‑to‑trough drop, or max drawdown, was about -21.5%, similar to global stocks. With only 1.6 years of data, these results mainly describe how the portfolio handled one particular market phase rather than revealing stable long‑term patterns, so they should be viewed as an early snapshot, not a long history.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection uses the limited historical data to simulate many possible 15‑year paths for a €1,000 investment. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if” engine: it shuffles returns thousands of times to see a range of future outcomes, from weak to strong. The median result is about €2,760, with most scenarios falling between roughly €1,855 and €4,118, and an 85% chance of ending positive. The average simulated annual return is 8.21%. Because the input history is only 1.6 years, the simulation may be capturing recent market conditions more than long‑term norms, so these numbers are best seen as broad ballpark ranges, not precise forecasts.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the portfolio is in stocks, so the asset class view is very straightforward: 100% equities and 0% bonds or cash. This means there is full exposure to stock market ups and downs, with no built‑in stabilizer from safer assets. Compared with typical “balanced” mixes that often include meaningful bond allocations, this portfolio is more growth‑oriented in structure, even if the risk score labels it as balanced. An all‑equity allocation can deliver stronger long‑term growth, but the path is usually more volatile. In practice, the ride will depend entirely on how global stock markets behave, since there are no other asset classes here to cushion large equity swings.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    21%
  • Financials
    21%
  • Industrials
    14%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    12%
  • Energy
    8%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Basic Materials
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector exposure is fairly diversified across the economy. Technology and Financials are the largest at 21% each, followed by Industrials and Consumer Discretionary with mid‑teens and low‑teens weights. The rest is spread among Energy, Health Care, Telecoms, Materials, Staples, Utilities, and Real Estate, each in single digits. This balance is broadly in line with many global equity benchmarks, which is a good sign for diversification: no single economic area dominates the picture. Tech and growth‑oriented industries can be more sensitive to interest rate changes, while Financials can react more strongly to economic and credit cycles, so this sector mix can lead to noticeable swings when macro conditions shift.

Regions Info

  • North America
    66%
  • Europe Developed
    14%
  • Japan
    7%
  • Asia Developed
    5%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, about two‑thirds of the portfolio is in North America, with the rest spread across Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and small slices of emerging regions. This US‑heavy tilt is quite similar to the global stock market today, where US companies make up the largest share of total market value. That alignment with global benchmarks is helpful: it means the portfolio is capturing a broad slice of worldwide corporate earnings while still reflecting where most market capitalization sits. At the same time, it does mean outcomes are strongly tied to North American economic and policy trends. Non‑US areas still matter here, but they have a smaller influence on overall performance.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    26%
  • Mid-cap
    24%
  • Large-cap
    22%
  • Small-cap
    18%
  • Micro-cap
    10%

Market‑cap exposure is nicely spread out: 26% mega‑cap, 22% large‑cap, 24% mid‑cap, 18% small‑cap, and 10% micro‑cap. That’s more tilted toward smaller companies than a typical global index, which is usually dominated by mega‑ and large‑caps. Smaller firms often have more room to grow but can be more volatile and sensitive to economic slowdowns. This mix creates a blend of stability from big, established names and extra growth potential from the smaller end of the spectrum. The explicit allocation to a small‑cap value ETF explains much of this tilt and suggests that size and style are intentional ingredients rather than just side effects of the main global fund.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    2.48%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Apple Inc.
    2.26%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Amazon.com Inc
    1.46%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Microsoft Corporation
    1.30%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.20%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.08%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.86%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Meta Platforms Inc.
    0.86%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • Lam Research Corp
    0.67%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
  • SK Hynix Inc
    0.66%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF
  • Top 10 total 12.83%

The look‑through view shows that a handful of large technology and internet‑related companies, like NVIDIA, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta, appear in the underlying ETF holdings. Individually, the biggest of these is under 2.5% of the total portfolio, and the combined top‑10 stocks shown cover only about 17% of ETF assets, so no single company dominates. At the same time, the presence of the same big names across multiple funds does create some overlap, which is normal for global equity products. Because only ETF top‑10 holdings are captured, overall overlap is likely higher than shown, but there is no sign of extreme single‑stock concentration here.

Risk contribution Info

  • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
    Weight: 70.00%
    68.9%
  • Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR
    Weight: 20.00%
    21.4%
  • Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF
    Weight: 10.00%
    9.8%

Risk contribution looks at how much each holding drives the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from simple weights. Here, the main global equity ETF is 70% of the portfolio and contributes about 69% of the risk, almost one‑for‑one. The small‑cap value ETF is 20% by weight but adds around 21% of the risk, slightly more than its size, reflecting typically higher volatility in small‑cap value stocks. The emerging markets ETF is 10% and contributes roughly 10% of risk. Overall, risk is spread almost exactly in line with weights, and all three funds together account for essentially all portfolio volatility, with no hidden risk driver lurking in a small position.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

The risk vs. return chart shows the current mix very close to the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier is the curve of best possible return for each risk level using just these three holdings in different weights. The current portfolio Sharpe ratio is 0.9, while the maximum‑Sharpe combination is 1.2 and the minimum‑variance option is 0.98, all fairly close together. The Sharpe ratio compares return to volatility after adjusting for a risk‑free rate; higher means better risk‑adjusted performance. With the portfolio sitting on or near the frontier, the allocation looks efficient given these building blocks, especially impressive considering the short performance history feeding the model.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR 0.22%
  • Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR 0.39%
  • Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF 0.35%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.27%

The weighted ongoing cost, or Total Expense Ratio (TER), is about 0.27% per year across the three ETFs. TER is the annual fee charged by the funds, taken directly from assets, so it quietly reduces returns a bit each year. For an actively tilted global equity strategy using specialist ETFs, this cost level is impressively low and broadly competitive. Lower fees mean more of the portfolio’s gross return stays in the investor’s hands, and the benefit compounds over time. Over short periods like 1.6 years, cost differences are small in euros, but across decades they can add up significantly, so starting from a low‑cost base is a meaningful positive.

What next?

Create your own report?

Join our community!

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey