Globally diversified stock portfolio with low costs and efficient balance between growth and risk

Report created on Apr 9, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

The portfolio is very simple and very focused: three broad stock ETFs make up 100% of the allocation. Roughly half is in a global developed markets fund, with the rest split between emerging markets and a broad European fund. This kind of structure is easy to understand and maintain, which matters a lot for long‑term investing. Everything here is in equities, so the ride can be bumpy, but the mix of global, emerging, and regional exposure spreads that bumpiness across many different companies. A straightforward takeaway: this setup suits someone who wants pure stock-market exposure without the complexity of many niche or overlapping products.

Growth Info

Historically, €1,000 grew to about €2,016 over seven years, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.3%. CAGR is like the average speed of a car on a long road trip, smoothing out stops and accelerations. This lagged the US market by about 3.6 percentage points and the global market by 1.2 points, mostly because the US had an exceptionally strong run. Max drawdown, the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, was about -33%, very similar to the benchmarks, which shows the risk level is in line with global stocks. The key point is that returns were solid and volatility was normal for an all‑equity mix, but not as turbocharged as a pure US bet.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation runs 1,000 random “what if” market paths using historical patterns to project possible futures. It’s like simulating many parallel timelines based on past ups and downs, then seeing where most of them end up. Here, the median outcome turns €1,000 into about €2,803 after 15 years, with a wide but reasonable range around that. An 85% chance of finishing positive is encouraging, but it’s not a guarantee. Simulations rely on past data, which can change if the future behaves differently. The big takeaway: expect meaningful growth over long periods, but be mentally ready for large swings along the way.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the portfolio is in stocks, with no bonds, cash, or alternatives. That makes it very growth‑oriented and easy to grasp, but it also means there’s no built‑in “shock absorber” when markets fall. In mixed portfolios, bonds and cash usually help smooth the ride, especially during recessions. Here, any major market downturn will hit the full portfolio value. For someone with a long horizon and the stomach for volatility, that’s acceptable. For anyone needing short‑term stability, it would be wise to recognize that this setup trades comfort today for potentially higher growth over many years.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    25%
  • Financials
    19%
  • Industrials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    5%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is nicely spread out, with technology at about 25%, financials around 19%, and meaningful stakes in industrials, consumer areas, health care, and others. Tech is the largest slice, but not to an extreme degree, which aligns well with global benchmarks. This balance helps avoid being overly dependent on one type of business model or economic driver. For example, if interest rates hurt growth stocks, financials or defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities can partly offset the pain. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards, which is a strong indicator of healthy diversification by sector.

Regions Info

  • North America
    37%
  • Europe Developed
    28%
  • Asia Developed
    13%
  • Asia Emerging
    12%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Africa/Middle East
    3%
  • Latin America
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Europe Emerging
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio is spread across North America, developed Europe, developed Asia, and a solid chunk in emerging regions. North America is the largest part at 37%, but much lower than many global indices where it often exceeds 60%. That means less reliance on one economy and currency, and more exposure to different growth engines worldwide. Emerging markets plus non‑US developed markets form the majority here, which can be a strength if global leadership rotates away from the US. The flip side is that performance can lag during periods when US stocks dominate. Overall, this is a genuinely global footprint.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    52%
  • Large-cap
    33%
  • Mid-cap
    13%

Most of the portfolio sits in mega‑cap and large‑cap companies, with about two‑thirds in the very largest firms and only around 13% in mid‑caps. Market capitalization just means the total value of a company’s shares; larger firms tend to be more stable but sometimes slower‑growing than smaller ones. This tilt toward giants helps reduce company‑specific blow‑ups, because these businesses are typically diversified and well‑established. However, it also means less exposure to the more volatile small‑cap space, which historically has sometimes offered higher returns. Overall, this is a classic, benchmark‑like size mix that prioritizes stability over aggressive small‑cap bets.

True holdings Info

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
    4.00%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    2.53%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • Apple Inc
    2.30%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
    1.81%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Microsoft Corporation
    1.63%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • Amazon.com Inc
    1.18%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • Tencent Holdings Ltd
    1.08%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Alphabet Inc Class A
    1.06%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • SK Hynix Inc
    1.03%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
    0.89%
    Part of fund(s):
    • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
  • Top 10 total 17.50%

Looking through the ETFs, the top exposures include big names like Taiwan Semiconductor, NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, plus major Asian tech firms such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Tencent. These show a strong tilt toward global technology and communication platforms. Several of these companies appear via multiple ETFs, creating hidden concentration even though each ETF is broad. Because only top‑10 holdings are captured, the real overlap is probably higher. The implication: while the ETFs look diversified on the surface, a notable chunk of risk is driven by a relatively small group of mega tech and semiconductor companies.

Risk contribution Info

  • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
    Weight: 50.00%
    52.3%
  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
    Weight: 30.00%
    29.9%
  • Amundi Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF C EUR
    Weight: 20.00%
    17.8%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding affects the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the global ETF at 50% weight contributes about 52% of risk, emerging markets at 30% weight add about 30% of risk, and Europe at 20% weight contributes roughly 18%. That’s very proportional, with no single ETF dominating volatility beyond its size. It’s like an orchestra where each section is playing at about the volume you’d expect from its headcount. If someone wanted to tweak risk, shifting between these three would change the profile, but there’s no hidden “time bomb” position here.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk–return chart, the current mix sits on or very near the efficient frontier. The efficient frontier shows the best possible return for each risk level using only the existing holdings but with different weightings. A Sharpe ratio of 0.53 is slightly below the max‑Sharpe version at 0.68 and the minimum‑variance option at 0.61, but the gap isn’t huge. Sharpe ratio just measures return per unit of risk, like getting the most “speed” for each bit of “fuel.” Since the current allocation is already efficient, there’s no obvious structural mismatch — any further tweaks would be more about fine‑tuning than fixing a flaw.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Amundi Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF C EUR 0.07%
  • SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR 0.12%
  • Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C 0.18%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.13%

The total expense ratio (TER) across the three ETFs averages around 0.13% per year, which is impressively low. TER is the annual fee charged by a fund, taken directly from its assets, a bit like a small management toll. Over long horizons, even tiny fee differences compound into real money, so being in this low‑cost range is a big structural advantage. Costs here are competitive with some of the cheapest products on the market and clearly support better long‑term performance. This is an area where the portfolio is already doing exactly what it should, and there’s no obvious drag from excessive fees.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey