Simple broad US equity tracker with very low cost and strong long term growth profile
Report created on Mar 27, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
VU Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
VUSA - IE00B3XXRP09 100.00%
This portfolio is extremely straightforward: 100% is invested in a single ETF tracking a broad US large‑cap index. That means every pound is tied to one asset class and one fund provider, with no bonds, cash, or alternatives in the mix. This kind of “all‑in” equity structure is common for growth‑focused investors who are comfortable with ups and downs. The key implication is that returns will move closely with the underlying index, with almost no smoothing from defensive assets. Anyone using this setup typically relies on time horizon and emotional discipline, rather than diversification across many asset types, to handle inevitable market swings.
Growth
One or more local-currency benchmark funds are unavailable for this report.
Over the last decade, a hypothetical £1,000 grew to about £3,940, giving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.65%. CAGR is like the average yearly “speed” of growth over the whole journey. The worst peak‑to‑trough fall (max drawdown) was about -25.5%, showing that while the ride has been rewarding, it has not been smooth. Compared with a broader US market benchmark here, the portfolio lagged by around 15.9% per year, suggesting the reference benchmark captured more aggressive or different exposures. As always, past performance cannot predict the future, but it does show this approach has historically delivered strong growth with meaningful volatility.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All of the money sits in stocks, with 0% in bonds, cash, or alternative assets. That’s a very growth‑oriented stance, which tends to work best for long time horizons and investors who can ride through big declines without panicking. In many broad global benchmarks, equities are balanced with a meaningful allocation to bonds or other stabilisers, which can reduce drawdowns but also limit upside. A 100% equity allocation like this maximises exposure to company earnings and innovation but also maximises sensitivity to equity market shocks. A general takeaway: this kind of setup really leans on time in the market and personal risk tolerance instead of diversification across asset classes.
Sectors
- Technology 34%
- Financials 12%
- Telecommunications 11%
- Consumer Discretionary 11%
- Health Care 9%
- Industrials 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
- Basic Materials 2%
Sector allocation is clearly dominated by technology at around 34%, with financials, telecoms, and consumer‑oriented areas making up much of the rest. This is fairly similar to how major US indices look today, where tech and tech‑adjacent businesses have grown very large. The upside is participation in innovation‑driven growth and digital infrastructure. The flip side is that tech‑heavy portfolios can be more volatile when interest rates rise or when markets rotate toward cheaper or more defensive areas. The good news is that the spread across other sectors is still broad, so while tech is a clear driver, there is some cushioning from more traditional industries.
Regions
- North America 99%
Geographically, exposure is almost entirely North American at 99%, with the portfolio effectively tied to one economic region and currency zone. This kind of home‑or single‑region tilt can do very well when that market outperforms, as the US has for much of the last decade. However, it also means limited diversification against local policy shifts, sector make‑up, or valuation cycles that are specific to that region. Many global equity benchmarks include a more balanced mix of regions, spreading risk across different economies and political systems. Here, the main message is that regional concentration is intentional and should align with how comfortable the investor feels being so US‑centric.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 46%
- Large-cap 35%
- Mid-cap 18%
- Small-cap 1%
By market capitalisation, the portfolio leans strongly toward mega‑caps and large‑caps, with 81% in those categories and only 1% in small‑caps. That’s typical of a cap‑weighted index where the biggest companies dominate the index weight. Large, established firms often have more stable earnings and deeper financing access, which can reduce company‑specific risk compared to small‑caps. However, it can also limit exposure to some of the higher‑growth potential found in smaller businesses. Overall, this tilt supports smoother behaviour than a small‑cap‑heavy portfolio, though it does rely on the largest companies continuing to drive returns rather than the next generation of smaller innovators.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 7.86%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
AA Apple Inc 6.49%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 5.41%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 3.94%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 3.33%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 2.66%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 2.65%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 2.64%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
TS Tesla Inc 2.05%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-
BR Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.49%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
- Top 10 total 38.50%
Looking through the ETF, the top exposures are heavily tilted to a small group of mega‑cap US companies, especially well‑known tech‑related names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Together, these top positions represent a sizeable slice of the ETF’s value, even though they are all held through the same single fund. There is no overlap between multiple ETFs here, but there is still concentration risk because the index itself is top‑heavy. If those few giants struggle at the same time, the overall portfolio could feel it quickly. This kind of structural concentration is simply how market‑cap‑weighted indices behave.
Factors
Factor exposure is dominated by a very high tilt to low volatility at 97%, with value, size, and momentum all on the low side and quality and yield around neutral. Factors are like the underlying “traits” that explain why groups of stocks behave the way they do over time. A strong low‑vol tilt suggests that, within the index, the holdings behave more like lower‑risk equities relative to the broader market. In practice, that can mean shallower drawdowns in some sell‑offs, but it may lag in very aggressive, speculative rallies. The weaker value and size tilts mean there is less exposure to cheap or smaller companies, reinforcing the focus on large, steadier names.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
Weight: 100.00% 100.0%
Risk contribution here is extremely simple: one ETF accounts for 100% of the portfolio and therefore 100% of its volatility. Risk contribution measures how much each holding adds to overall ups and downs, which can differ from just looking at weights. With a single fund, there is no internal balancing between different instruments, and any shock to that ETF or its underlying market flows straight through to the total portfolio. The positive side is clarity: it’s very easy to understand what’s driving risk. The trade‑off is that there is no built‑in diversification across multiple funds or strategies that might behave differently in stressed environments.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF 0.07%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%
Costs are impressively low, with a total ongoing charge (TER) of 0.07%. TER is the annual fee the fund charges to cover management and operations, quietly deducted inside the ETF. Over long horizons, even small fee differences compound significantly, so being at this level is a real strength. It means more of the market return ends up in the investor’s pocket rather than being eaten by charges. This aligns very well with best practices in long‑term investing, where keeping costs down is one of the few things within direct control. From a cost perspective, this setup is extremely efficient and already in a very competitive zone.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey