Globally diversified growth portfolio with a bold crypto tilt and strong equity factor tilts
Report created on Mar 26, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
What type of investor this portfolio is suitable for
Growth Investors
This setup fits someone with a clear growth mentality, a long investment horizon, and a strong stomach for volatility. They are likely more focused on maximizing long‑term wealth than smoothing short‑term swings, and they can tolerate sharp temporary losses without panicking. Goals might include building substantial capital for financial independence, retirement far in the future, or large long‑term projects. A high risk tolerance is essential, especially given the sizeable crypto allocation and the equity‑heavy structure. Patience and discipline during deep market drawdowns would be key traits, as this type of investor accepts meaningful ups and downs in pursuit of higher expected long‑run outcomes.
Positions
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 65.05% -
Bitcoin
BTC 18.59% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
IWVL - IE00BP3QZB59 8.55% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
WSML - IE00BF4RFH31 7.81%
The structure is dominated by a global stock ETF at about two‑thirds, with the rest split between a sizeable Bitcoin stake and two focused equity ETFs for value and small caps. That means the core behaves like a broad global stock market holding, while satellite positions add extra risk and potential return. This mix keeps things relatively simple while still introducing some deliberate tilts. The big observation is that only four positions drive everything, which is easy to manage but increases reliance on a few building blocks. The main takeaway is that this is a concentrated “core and satellites” setup built for growth, with one clearly high‑octane component.
Growth
Historically, the portfolio has been very strong: the example €1,000 more than doubled the US market and clearly beat the global market, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 20% versus 13% and 11%. CAGR is the “average yearly speed” over the full journey. The trade‑off is a much deeper worst loss, with a max drawdown over 45% compared with around 34% for the benchmarks. That means bigger temporary hits during bad periods. This pattern fits a growth‑oriented, higher‑risk profile: impressive upside over the last years, but at the cost of larger swings that not everyone can calmly sit through.
Projection
The forward projection uses Monte Carlo simulation, which basically takes the portfolio’s historical pattern of returns and volatility, shuffles them thousands of ways, and creates many possible future paths. It’s like running 1,000 different “what if” market histories to see a range of outcomes. Median results are very strong, and even the lower‑end scenarios are mostly positive, which reflects how powerful high returns can be when compounded. But the extreme upside numbers also highlight that simulations can look almost too good when based on a very strong recent past. As always, past performance and modelled paths are not guarantees; they just describe what might happen if markets behave somewhat like they did before.
Asset classes
- Stocks 81%
- Crypto 19%
Asset‑class exposure is straightforward: roughly four‑fifths in stocks and about one‑fifth in crypto. For a growth profile, a high equity share is very common and aligns well with long‑term wealth building, since stocks historically outpaced cash and bonds over long horizons. The distinctive part here is that the “risk diversifier” is not bonds or cash but a volatile asset like Bitcoin. That means the portfolio’s fate is tied almost entirely to risky assets, with limited cushion in severe downturns. This setup can suit someone comfortable with big ups and downs and focused on long‑term growth rather than stability or regular income, but it is definitely on the aggressive side.
Sectors
- Technology 21%
- Crypto 19%
- Financials 13%
- Industrials 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 8%
- Health Care 7%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector allocation across the equity part is nicely broad: technology leads but not overwhelmingly, followed by meaningful slices in financials, industrials, consumer‑related areas, healthcare, and smaller exposures across materials, energy, utilities, and real estate. Crypto sits as its own sizeable bucket. Compared with typical global equity mixes, the sector picture is reasonably balanced, which is a strong indicator of diversification within the stock sleeve. Tech’s prominence can make returns more sensitive to interest‑rate moves and innovation cycles, but the presence of value and small‑cap funds helps spread exposure beyond trendy growth names. This alignment with broad sector distributions is a clear positive for long‑term resilience.
Regions
- North America 50%
- Europe Developed 14%
- Japan 7%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 4%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Crypto positions are excluded from this geography breakdown.
Geographically, the portfolio leans toward North America at about half of assets, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, developed Asia, emerging Asia, and smaller allocations to other regions. That pattern is quite similar to many global equity benchmarks, where the largest developed market naturally dominates. This alignment is beneficial because it captures the main engines of global corporate earnings while still sprinkling exposure across multiple regions. It reduces reliance on any single country’s economy or politics, even though global crises will still hit most markets together. For someone seeking straightforward global equity exposure, this geographic mix is well balanced and closely tracks widely used global allocations.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 34%
- Large-cap 27%
- Mid-cap 15%
- Small-cap 4%
- Micro-cap 1%
Crypto positions are excluded from this market-cap breakdown.
By market capitalization, there is a clear tilt toward larger companies: mega and big caps together make up the bulk, with meaningful but smaller exposure to mid, small, and micro caps. Large companies tend to be more stable, diversified businesses with deeper liquidity, which usually leads to smoother trading and often slightly lower volatility than tiny firms. The dedicated small‑cap ETF intentionally pushes some weight into the smaller end of the spectrum, adding potential for higher long‑term growth and different drivers of return. This blend gives a solid large‑cap backbone while still tapping into the historically higher return potential of smaller businesses, improving diversification inside the equity slice.
True holdings
-
NVIDIA Corporation 2.74%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Apple Inc 2.55%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Microsoft Corporation 1.93%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Amazon.com Inc 1.33%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Alphabet Inc Class A 1.20%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.03%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Broadcom Inc 0.98%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Alphabet Inc Class C 0.97%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Meta Platforms Inc. 0.94%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Tesla Inc 0.75%Part of fund(s):
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 14.42%
Looking through the ETFs, the largest underlying company exposures are well‑known global giants like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, each under 3% of the overall portfolio. This shows a healthy spread across many big names rather than a single stock dominating. There is some overlap, because several ETFs naturally hold the same mega‑caps, but at the weights shown this looks like normal index‑style concentration rather than an extreme bet. The data only covers ETF top‑10 holdings, so real overlap is higher than reported, yet still broadly diversified. Overall, the building blocks give wide company exposure, with no hidden single‑stock risk spike visible in the top layer.
Factors
Factor exposure shows strong tilts toward value, yield, and low volatility, with moderate momentum and a noticeable size tilt thanks to small caps. Factors are like “personality traits” of stocks that research links to long‑term return patterns. A value tilt means more exposure to companies priced cheaply relative to fundamentals; yield suggests a bias to income‑paying stocks; low volatility leans toward steadier names. Together, these traits often behave differently from a pure growth or momentum style and can hold up better in certain downturns, though they may lag in raging tech‑led rallies. The average signal coverage is modest, so numbers are approximate, but they still confirm intentional diversifying tilts rather than a pure market‑cap clone.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 65.05% 44.1% -
Bitcoin
Weight: 18.59% 43.8% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Weight: 7.81% 6.3% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Weight: 8.55% 5.9%
Risk contribution reveals the real story: Bitcoin, despite being under 20% of the weight, contributes almost the same amount of total risk as the 65% global ETF. Risk contribution measures how much each holding adds to the portfolio’s overall ups and downs, and here the crypto stake punches far above its weight. The top three holdings account for over 94% of risk, showing that small adjustments to these positions can meaningfully change the ride. This doesn’t mean the setup is wrong; it just underscores how dominant one volatile asset can be. Anyone reviewing this portfolio should decide consciously whether that concentrated risk is intentional and emotionally tolerable through big drawdowns.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
On the risk‑return chart, the current mix sits on the efficient frontier, which means that for its particular weights across these holdings, it uses them in an efficient way. The efficient frontier is the curve of best possible returns for each risk level using the existing ingredients. The fact that the portfolio lies on this curve is a big positive: it suggests no obvious waste of risk. The highest‑Sharpe (best risk‑adjusted) version would take a bit more risk for somewhat higher expected return, while a minimum‑variance version would cut risk and return together. Any future tweaks can focus on shifting along the frontier based on comfort with volatility, rather than fixing inefficiency.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.30%
- iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.35%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.18%
The total cost level, with a blended ongoing charge around 0.18%, is impressively low for such a diversified global setup. TER (total expense ratio) is the percentage skimmed each year by the funds to cover management and operations, and small differences compound meaningfully over decades. Keeping costs below typical active‑fund levels is a big structural advantage, letting more of the portfolio’s return stay in your pocket. This cost profile aligns strongly with best practices in long‑term investing: broad, cheap index‑based building blocks plus a couple of specialized tilts at still‑reasonable fees. On the cost front, everything is very well set up for long‑run compounding.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey