Roast mode 🔥

A growth junkie portfolio wearing a Balanced name tag and flirting with shiny side quests

Report created on Dec 23, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This setup looks like a sensible core portfolio that got drunk and started adding “fun” side bets. Around 45% is broad stock-market ETFs (US and international), which is textbook boring in a good way. Then you bolt on uranium, spacey “Final Frontiers,” metals, defense, plus handpicked mega-tech names already inside your core ETF. That’s like ordering a combo meal and then buying the same burger à la carte three more times. The structure leans growth-heavy for something labeled “Balanced.” Tighten the chaos: keep a solid core, cap the spicy satellites to a small slice, and decide whether you’re building a plan or a highlight reel.

Growth Info

Historically this thing has ripped: a ~17% CAGR is “market-plus-steroids” territory. If someone had tossed in $10,000 at the start, ending north of $40–50k over a decade-ish wouldn’t be shocking versus maybe $30k in a vanilla index fund. But that came with a max drawdown of about –27%, which means a quarter of your money disappearing on screen at one point. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is just “average speed on a crazy road trip,” and it hides the potholes. Efficient? Maybe. Lucky? Also very possible. Don’t assume yesterday’s hot streak calmly repeats for the next 10–20 years.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results scream “optimistic sci‑fi.” Monte Carlo is basically: “Let’s mash up past data and random shocks 1,000 times and see what the future might look like.” A median result of +768% and average annualized 21.6% is fantasyland-level strong. That’s more superhero origin story than realistic retirement plan. Also, 95.5% positive simulations doesn’t mean you’re safe; it just means the model is using a very sunny view of risk. Past data is like yesterday’s weather: useful, but it doesn’t know when the hurricane decides to show up. Plan assuming lower growth and fatter drops, then be pleasantly surprised if it beats that.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    85%
  • Other
    5%

Calling this “Balanced” with 85% in stocks and 0% in bonds is adorable. Asset classes are just different buckets: stocks (growth but bumpy), bonds (boring but stabilizing), cash (sleep-at-night money), and “other” like metals. Here, “other” is 5% and mostly silver and gold cosplay, which is more volatility decoration than true ballast. When stocks crash, you basically have…more stocks. A genuinely balanced setup usually leans closer to 40–60% bonds or similar stabilizers. If the goal is smoother long-term compounding instead of ego-boosting green days, consider adding a real safety bucket instead of just shiny rocks.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    22%
  • Industrials
    17%
  • Telecommunications
    14%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Financials
    7%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector-wise, this is “Tech and Friends” with a defense and space obsession. Tech at 22% plus Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Uber on top is more like a tech-adjacent theme park than broad neutrality. Industrials at 17% get juiced by aerospace & defense, and there’s a sprinkle of uranium and “Final Frontiers,” which are basically leveraged optimism on specialized themes. Compared to a plain global index, you’re tilting harder toward growth and geopolitical risk. Fun, but twitchy. If you want this to survive a nasty tech or defense slump without wrecking your mood, tone down overlapping bets and let the diversified funds do more of the heavy lifting.

Regions Info

  • North America
    74%
  • Europe Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geography says “America or bust,” with North America at 74% and the rest of the world standing in the corner with a lukewarm drink. International exposure around 10–15% via VXUS-style holdings is decent, but still well below the global market weight, which is closer to half non-US. That means your fate is chained to the US economy, US policy, and US valuations staying pretty. Great when the US is winning, brutal if other regions outperform or the dollar stumbles. You don’t need to become a hardcore global nomad, but bumping non-US exposure a bit could keep you from betting your entire future on one country’s stock mood swings.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    34%
  • Large-cap
    26%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    8%
  • Micro-cap
    2%

Market-cap mix is actually one of the calmer parts of this circus: 34% mega, 26% big, then a reasonable fade into mid/small. That’s roughly in line with broad indexes thanks to the total-market funds. The chaos comes from layering big single-name giants (Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Uber) on top of an already mega-cap-heavy ETF. It’s like adding four extra drivers to a bus that was already going the right direction. You’re not wildly skewed into tiny speculative names, which is good, but you are double-counting your biggest positions. If you want real diversification, tilt add-ons toward what the core owns less of, not the same headliners.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Risk versus return here is less “efficient frontier” and more “YOLO frontier disguised as moderate.” The efficient frontier is just the sweet spot where you get the most expected return for each unit of risk. With 17%+ historical returns and –27% drawdowns, you’re sitting in a high-growth, high-punch zone that doesn’t match a typical “Balanced” label. You’ve stacked overlapping growth bets instead of combining truly different risk drivers. That’s fine if you admit it’s an aggressive growth tilt and plan for ugly years. To move closer to efficiency, trim redundant high-vol positions, add real stabilizers, and accept that boring assets are what let you stay invested when the fireworks go the wrong way.

Dividends Info

  • Alphabet Inc Class A 0.30%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.50%
  • Meta Platforms Inc. 0.30%
  • SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers 0.50%
  • Global X Uranium ETF 1.60%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.20%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.89%

Total yield under 1% is a polite way of saying: you’re here for growth, not paychecks. That’s fine if the plan is long-term compounding and reinvestment, but it’s useless for anyone wanting near-term income. Your dividend flow is basically pocket change from broad ETFs plus a few reluctant drips from sector funds, while your star names (Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Uber) mostly refuse to pay rent. Dividends aren’t magic, but they can smooth returns and give you optionality in bad markets. If income will ever matter, start building a modest, reliable yield base instead of hoping to sell chunks of a volatile portfolio at the worst possible time.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares® Gold Trust Micro 0.09%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.40%
  • SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers 0.45%
  • iShares Silver Trust 0.50%
  • Global X Uranium ETF 0.69%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.15%

Costs are the one area where this thing acts like a responsible adult. A 0.15% total TER is impressively low considering you’ve sprinkled in some expensive toys: uranium at 0.69%, metals at 0.50%, defense and “Final Frontiers” around 0.40–0.45%. Luckily, the massive allocation to rock-bottom Vanguard and cheap iShares index funds drags the average back down. You basically walked into a theme-ETF candy store but remembered to shop at Costco for the basics. Still, every high-fee satellite needs to earn its keep. If a flashy ETF doesn’t clearly add diversification or strategy you can explain in one sentence, ask why you’re paying premium pricing for it.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey