A global equity heavy portfolio with strong US tilt and impressively low ongoing product costs

Report created on Aug 20, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is made up of just two broad equity ETFs, with roughly sixty percent in a global fund and forty percent in a large US index fund. That structure gives very wide company coverage but adds overlap because the global fund already holds many of the same US stocks. Structure matters because it shapes how sensitive the portfolio is to different markets and how concentrated hidden positions become. Here, the overlap means the portfolio is effectively more US focused than it first appears. A simple next step could be checking a “look-through” breakdown and deciding whether to keep both funds or simplify into a single broad holding.

Growth Info

Historically, an investment of 10,000 units growing at a 12.5% CAGR (compound annual growth rate) would have reached about 32,900 over ten years, assuming a smooth path. CAGR is like the average speed of a car over a long trip, ignoring bumps in the road. In reality, this portfolio faced a maximum drawdown of roughly -33%, meaning a big temporary drop during stressed markets. Compared with typical balanced benchmarks, which mix in bonds, this pattern looks more like a pure equity profile: higher growth but deeper falls. These strong past numbers are encouraging but always remember that past performance does not guarantee similar results in future markets.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis used 1,000 simulations to project future outcomes, based on how similar portfolios behaved historically. Monte Carlo is essentially a “what if” engine: it randomly shuffles many possible return paths to show a range of endings. Here, the median outcome of around 385% growth suggests the portfolio could multiply several times over long horizons, while even the 5th percentile stays above break-even. That aligns with a high-growth, high-volatility structure. However, because the model relies on past data and assumptions that markets behave in similar patterns, its results should be seen as a rough weather forecast, not a precise map, especially under future crises or regime shifts.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All of the portfolio sits in stocks, with no material allocation to bonds, cash alternatives, or other asset types. Asset classes behave differently: stocks are growth engines but can swing a lot; bonds and cash tend to cushion falls, like shock absorbers on a car. Holding only stocks usually means larger portfolio ups and downs, especially during recessions or rate shocks, even if long-term returns can be higher. Compared with traditional balanced benchmarks, which often hold 30–50% defensive assets, this portfolio is much more growth-tilted. Anyone wanting a smoother experience over shorter horizons might consider introducing a small but meaningful allocation to steadier asset types.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    32%
  • Financials
    15%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is tilted toward technology at about a third of the portfolio, followed by financials, consumer cyclicals, communication services, and industrials. This composition is actually quite close to major global equity benchmarks today, so it broadly reflects the modern economy’s structure. That’s a positive sign and suggests the sector mix is reasonably up to date and diversified. The tech tilt can boost returns when innovation and growth names are in favor, but it can also mean sharper falls if interest rates rise or sentiment turns against high-growth companies. Regularly checking whether this tilt still fits personal comfort with volatility can help keep expectations aligned.

Regions Info

  • North America
    79%
  • Europe Developed
    9%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, roughly four-fifths of the portfolio sits in North America, with smaller slices in developed Europe, Asia, Japan, and only minor exposure to emerging regions. This pattern is typical for global equity indexes, which are weighted by market size, so the alignment with benchmarks is strong and helps keep tracking error low. The benefit is exposure to some of the world’s most established markets and companies, which have delivered solid long-term results. The trade-off is that outcomes are heavily linked to one region’s fortunes. Anyone wanting more balance between regions might consider modestly increasing allocation to underrepresented areas to soften the impact of a prolonged US downturn.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    47%
  • Large-cap
    35%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    1%

By market capitalization, the portfolio is dominated by mega and big companies, with only a tiny slice in smaller firms. Market cap is basically the size of a company; large firms tend to be more stable and widely researched, while smaller ones can be more volatile but sometimes offer higher growth potential. This tilt toward giants closely mirrors mainstream index construction and is a good sign for liquidity and trading costs. It also keeps company-specific risk relatively low, because these are typically mature businesses. For investors looking to add an extra growth punch, a small deliberate tilt to mid or smaller companies could be an optional future tweak.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS Acc
    Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
    High correlation

Both ETFs in the portfolio are highly correlated, meaning their prices tend to move together because they share many of the same underlying companies. Correlation measures how similarly assets move; if two lines on a chart rise and fall in sync, correlation is high. High correlation reduces diversification benefits because, during market stress, everything can drop at the same time. While the current pair of funds still provides great global reach, simplification might cut redundancy without materially changing risk exposure. Focusing on a core global holding or pairing it with genuinely different assets could help make each position work harder from a diversification perspective.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

From a risk–return perspective, this portfolio currently sits on the aggressive side for something labeled “balanced,” mainly because it is 100% in stocks. The Efficient Frontier is a concept that shows the best possible trade-off between risk and return for a given mix of assets. Within the current two-ETF universe, shifting weights mainly adjusts how US-heavy the portfolio is, rather than truly changing its overall risk profile. To move closer to an efficient frontier in the classic sense, an investor would typically blend in lower-volatility assets. As a next step, reviewing whether this equity-only stance still matches personal comfort during deep drawdowns could be useful.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS Acc 0.07%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.14%

The overall ongoing cost (TER) of about 0.14% per year is impressively low and a major strength of this setup. Costs act like friction on an engine: even small percentages compound over time and can quietly eat into returns. Here, the low fees align with best practices for passive investing and compare very favorably with traditional funds and many active strategies. Keeping costs down helps more of the portfolio’s natural growth stay in the account, especially over decades. Given that the underlying building blocks are already cheap, there is little pressure to change; attention can stay on allocation and behavior instead of hunting for tiny fee reductions.

What next?

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey