A broadly diversified equity portfolio with smart tilts toward quality growth and small value factors

Report created on Aug 11, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a four‑ETF equity mix with about 70% in broad global stock index funds and 30% in intentional tilts. The core positions track the total US and total international markets, which keeps it closely aligned with common global equity benchmarks. On top of that, the small‑cap value and large growth tilt create a barbell structure that leans into long‑term factor premiums while still staying simple. This structure is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards for equity allocation. If stability matters, one thing to think about is whether adding even a small slice of defensive assets, like high‑quality bonds or cash equivalents, would better match a “balanced” risk label.

Growth Info

Using a simplified example, if someone had invested $10,000 in this mix at inception and achieved a 14.91% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), it might have grown to roughly $40,000 over 10 years. CAGR is just the “average yearly speed” of the portfolio over time. That return is very strong and likely ahead of common equity benchmarks, but it came with a maximum drawdown of about –26%, meaning a significant temporary drop at the worst point. This kind of historical pattern shows high growth potential with meaningful volatility. Since past performance never guarantees future results, it makes sense to treat these figures as a rough guide rather than a promise.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, with 1,000 simulations, suggests a wide range of possible futures for this portfolio. Monte Carlo simulations use past returns and volatility to generate many “what if” paths, then summarize the outcomes. Here, the median (50th percentile) outcome of about 602% means a hypothetical $10,000 could end around $60,000 in the middle scenario, while the 5th percentile of ~130% reflects a much lower but still positive outcome. The high average simulated return of 16.86% looks optimistic and partly reflects strong historical data. Because markets change, these projections should be viewed as scenario ranges, not expectations, especially under very different economic environments.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

The allocation is about 99% in stocks and 1% in cash, with no material exposure to bonds or alternative assets. For a “balanced” risk profile, this is more aggressive than usual, because balanced benchmarks often include 30–50% in defensive assets. Stocks historically deliver higher growth but can fall sharply during recessions or crises, and a nearly all‑equity mix will fully reflect that. The diversification score of 4 out of 5 shows the mix is broadly diversified within equities, which is a big positive. Still, if smoother ride and downside cushioning are priorities, introducing a meaningful allocation to more stable asset classes could help moderate large drawdowns.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    16%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    12%
  • Industrials
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Energy
    5%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Basic Materials
    4%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure shows a tech and growth lean, with Technology at 27% and Communication Services at 8%, reflecting the influence of broad US funds and the NASDAQ‑heavy ETF. Financial Services, Consumer Cyclicals, Industrials, and Healthcare also have strong representation, giving a healthy spread across the economy. This portfolio's sector composition matches benchmark data, which is a strong indicator of diversification. However, tech‑heavy portfolios may experience higher volatility when interest rates rise or when growth stocks fall out of favor. Keeping this tilt intentional is key; if recent performance rather than long‑term conviction drove it, gradually dialing the growth tilt up or down over time could keep risk better aligned with comfort levels.

Regions Info

  • North America
    72%
  • Europe Developed
    11%
  • Asia Emerging
    5%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, around 72% is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and a modest slice of emerging markets. This leans more toward the US than a pure global market‑cap index, but still provides meaningful international diversification. That alignment with common benchmarks is beneficial because it reduces single‑country risk and captures growth from multiple regions. A US tilt has helped over the last decade, but leadership can rotate, with other regions sometimes outperforming. If the goal is to closely mirror global market weights, increasing non‑US exposure slightly could be considered; if confidence in US leadership remains high, keeping the current mix is a reasonable, intentional stance.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    38%
  • Large-cap
    26%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    10%
  • Micro-cap
    9%

Market capitalization exposure is nicely spread: roughly 38% mega, 26% big, 14% medium, 10% small, and 9% micro. This looks well diversified and more balanced than many benchmark-only portfolios that are dominated by mega‑caps. The added small‑cap value ETF boosts smaller companies, which historically can offer higher long‑term returns but also bumpier rides. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards while still adding a deliberate small‑cap tilt. During severe downturns, smaller and riskier companies can fall harder and recover unevenly. If volatility feels too intense in future market stress, slightly trimming the very small and micro‑cap exposure and shifting toward larger, more established companies could smooth the overall ride.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, or Efficient Frontier, this mix likely sits in the higher‑risk, higher‑return zone of the equity curve. The Efficient Frontier is just a way of finding the combination of current holdings that offers the best possible trade‑off between volatility and expected return. Since this portfolio is nearly all stocks, “efficiency” here mainly means fine‑tuning how much is in broad market exposure versus the growth and small‑value tilts. Small shifts—for example, modestly reducing overlapping growth exposure or concentrating factor tilts—might slightly improve the risk‑return ratio without changing the fund lineup. It’s worth remembering that efficiency focuses on statistics, not personal comfort, tax realities, or behavioral discipline.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.56%

The blended dividend yield of about 1.56% is modest but healthy for a growth‑oriented equity mix. The international fund’s yield around 2.7% lifts income, while the NASDAQ‑focused ETF’s lower yield reflects its emphasis on growth companies that reinvest profits. Dividends can be helpful for those who like a steady cash flow, and reinvested payouts can quietly boost long‑term compounding. For someone prioritizing growth over current income, this level of yield is perfectly reasonable and not a concern. If reliable cash flow becomes more important later, shifting a slice of the portfolio toward higher‑yielding yet still diversified stock or balanced funds could increase income without overcomplicating the structure.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.09%

Overall costs are impressively low, with a total estimated expense ratio around 0.09% per year. The broad Vanguard ETFs are extremely cheap at 0.03% and 0.05%, and even the more specialized funds at 0.15% and 0.25% are reasonable for factor and index tilts. Over long periods, minimizing fees is one of the few levers firmly under investor control, and this portfolio is doing very well on that front. Lower fees mean more of the market’s return stays in the account each year. Periodically checking if cheaper, similarly diversified alternatives exist is sensible, but there’s no urgency here; the current fee structure already strongly supports long‑term performance.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey