A highly concentrated us focused equity portfolio with strong growth tilt and very low costs

Report created on Nov 10, 2024

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

2/5
Low Diversity
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The structure is extremely equity heavy with 100% in stocks and no allocation to bonds or cash-like assets. Two broad US equity funds together hold 80%, and the remaining funds largely overlap them, adding tilts rather than new exposure. Compared with a typical balanced benchmark that mixes stocks and bonds, this setup leans fully into market risk. That can work well in strong markets but can feel brutal in downturns. One way to strengthen this mix is to cut redundant funds that track similar holdings and use the freed-up space either for true diversifiers or to simplify into one or two core holdings for easier monitoring.

Growth Info

The reported historical compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 200% is unrealistically high and likely reflects a data or calculation issue. CAGR is the “average yearly speed” of growth over time, smoothing out ups and downs like checking your average speed on a long road trip. The max drawdown around -34% is more believable and shows how much the portfolio might fall from a prior peak. This level of drop is in line with aggressive equity portfolios during major market shocks. It makes sense to treat the return number as unreliable, but keep the drawdown as a reminder that large temporary losses are part of this risk profile.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo simulation output clearly looks broken, since every single scenario ends at -100%, which would mean total loss in every path. Monte Carlo is normally a tool that takes past return patterns and randomizes them thousands of times to show a range of future outcomes, like simulating many alternate “market histories.” In a healthy setup, you’d see both good and bad paths, not universal wipeout. Because this simulation is clearly faulty, it shouldn’t drive decisions. A better use of forward thinking here is to assume a wide range of possible equity returns and mentally prepare for both sharp drops and multi‑year gains, without relying on one specific forecast.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All assets sit in a single class: publicly traded stocks. There is no exposure to traditionally stabilizing asset classes such as bonds, cash, or alternatives, which is why the portfolio is flagged as speculative with low diversification. Having everything in one asset class means outcomes are almost entirely tied to the equity market cycle. When stocks rally, this is great; when they crash, there is nowhere to hide. For someone wanting a smoother ride, adding even a modest slice of defensive assets could help cushion downturns. For someone accepting this volatility, it still helps to remember that large swings are a structural feature, not a bug.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    39%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Telecommunications
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    2%

Sector exposure is dominated by technology at 39%, with the rest spread across financials, consumer cyclicals, communications, healthcare, and smaller slices elsewhere. This tech tilt, especially with an extra tech ETF and a large-cap growth ETF, amplifies sensitivity to interest rate changes and growth sentiment. Tech-heavy setups can soar when innovation and low rates are in favor, but they can also drop sharply when markets rotate into more defensive or value areas. The portfolio’s sector mix does roughly resemble major US growth-tilted benchmarks, which is a solid sign of alignment, but the added tech concentration means volatility could be higher than a plain market-weighted approach.

Regions Info

  • North America
    100%

Geographic exposure is 100% North America, effectively the US market. This aligns pretty closely with many US investors’ habits and with the dominance of US companies in global indices, which is why the portfolio’s regional tilt looks familiar and benchmark-like. However, with no allocation to Europe, Asia, or emerging markets, all risk and opportunity are tied to a single economy and currency. That can be great when US markets lead, as they’ve often done recently, but it leaves the portfolio exposed if US equities underperform other regions. Introducing even a modest slice of non-US exposure could help spread country and currency risk over time.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    44%
  • Large-cap
    32%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    4%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

The market cap spread is heavily skewed to mega and large companies, with about 76% in mega and big caps, 18% in mid caps, and only a slim exposure to small and micro caps. This is very much in line with broad US benchmarks, which are naturally dominated by the largest companies, so the market-cap mix is well-balanced and aligned with global standards. Large firms tend to be more stable and liquid, while small caps can be more volatile but offer different growth drivers. The current setup focuses more on stability within equities than on small-cap dynamism, so any desire for extra small-cap punch would require a conscious tilt.

Redundant positions Info

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
    High correlation

The funds are highly correlated with each other, especially the large-cap growth ETF, the tech ETF, and the total market ETF. Correlation measures how similarly assets move; a score near 1 means they generally go up and down together. In this case, the overlap in holdings means many of the funds are effectively riding the same underlying stocks. That overlap makes the portfolio simpler in terms of exposure but reduces diversification benefits, especially in downturns when everything may fall at once. A more streamlined set of core funds could keep the same broad exposure while reducing unnecessary duplication and making it clearer where the true risks lie.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this portfolio likely sits on the high‑risk, high‑return side of the spectrum. The Efficient Frontier is the curve of “best possible” portfolios for a given risk level using the existing ingredients; it’s about finding the highest expected return for each level of volatility. Because so many holdings overlap, shifting weights among them offers limited efficiency gains until redundancy is reduced. Focusing first on trimming highly similar funds could move the portfolio closer to that efficient curve. After that, small tweaks among the remaining holdings could improve the risk‑return ratio without changing the overall growth‑oriented character. Efficiency here is about tradeoff quality, not just more diversification.

Dividends Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF 2.00%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.04%

The overall yield of about 1.04% is modest, which makes sense given the strong growth and tech tilt. Dividends are the cash payouts companies send to shareholders, and they can help smooth returns, especially for income-focused investors. Here, the dedicated dividend ETF adds a bit of stability and raises the yield slightly, but growth-oriented funds dominate, so capital appreciation is the main engine. This income level is fine for a growth-first setup, and it broadly lines up with many US growth benchmarks. Anyone wanting meaningful cash flow would likely need to rethink the balance between dividend strategies and pure growth exposure.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF 0.08%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 ETF 0.02%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.03%

The total expense ratio around 0.03% is impressively low, especially for a multi-ETF lineup. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the ongoing fee charged by funds, and keeping it low is like reducing friction in an engine: more of the gains stay in your pocket over the years. These costs are better than what many broad benchmarks charge on average, which supports better long-term performance. With fees already this lean, there’s very little to improve on the cost side. The main opportunity is not to cut costs further, but to ensure each fund is actually adding unique value rather than just duplicating existing holdings.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey