A growth tilted stock heavy portfolio with strong diversification and impressively low ongoing costs

Report created on Sep 8, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The structure here is very clear: roughly half in a broad US large cap fund, a fifth tilted to a concentrated growth index, another fifth in broad international stocks, plus a smaller slice in US dividend payers. This creates a 99% stock and 1% cash mix that leans firmly toward growth while still spreading risk across thousands of companies. Compared with a typical “balanced” benchmark that might hold 40–60% in bonds, this setup will swing more with the stock market. Someone wanting to smooth the ride could gradually add a dedicated defensive sleeve, while a growth‑focused investor may simply maintain the current mix and rebalance periodically.

Growth Info

Using the reported compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 14.7%, a hypothetical 10,000 dollars invested for ten years would grow to around 39,000 if markets repeated the same pattern. That clearly beats most traditional balanced benchmarks over the last decade, thanks to the strong run in large US and growth‑oriented stocks. The max drawdown of roughly -26% shows that the worst peak‑to‑trough drop was painful but not catastrophic for an all‑equity portfolio. It is important to remember that past performance is not a promise; future decades can look very different. Regularly checking whether this level of volatility still feels acceptable is a smart move.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 simulated futures using historical return and volatility patterns, suggests a wide range of possible outcomes. Monte Carlo is essentially a “what if machine,” shaking the historical data into many different sequences to see where a portfolio might end up. A 5th percentile result of about 90% of starting value shows downside risk, while the median near 500% illustrates strong growth potential if markets cooperate. The average simulated return of roughly 14.9% mirrors the backtested period. Still, simulations rely heavily on the past; they can’t foresee new regimes or rare shocks, so they’re best viewed as rough weather maps, not precise forecasts.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

With 99% in stocks and only 1% in cash, asset class exposure is intentionally aggressive compared with a typical balanced benchmark that usually holds a sizable bond allocation. This stock‑heavy stance boosts long‑term growth potential but also means larger swings in account value, especially during market corrections or recessions. The upside is that the equity exposure is broadly diversified across many companies and regions, which helps manage risk within that stock bucket. Anyone wanting to dial down volatility could add a dedicated allocation to more stable asset classes over time, while a high‑risk‑tolerance investor may instead focus on disciplined rebalancing to keep the stock weighting near the intended target.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    34%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is nicely spread across technology, financials, consumer cyclicals, communication services, healthcare, industrials, and more defensive areas like consumer staples, utilities, and real estate. The roughly one‑third weight to technology plus meaningful communication services exposure creates a clear growth tilt, similar to common large‑cap benchmarks but somewhat more concentrated via the NASDAQ 100 slice. This can drive strong returns in periods of innovation and low rates but can also magnify drawdowns when growth stocks fall out of favor or when interest rates rise. This composition is reasonably aligned with modern benchmarks, which is a strong sign of diversification, but it’s worth periodically reviewing comfort with the growth tilt.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographic exposure is dominated by North America at about 81%, with the remainder spread across developed Europe, developed and emerging Asia, Japan, and smaller allocations to other regions. This US‑heavy stance closely mirrors many global benchmarks and has been rewarding over the past decade as US large caps outperformed. The addition of a broad international fund is a big positive, improving diversification by tapping into non‑US economic cycles and currencies. Still, international exposure is modest, so returns will largely track the US market. Someone wanting more global balance could slowly nudge the international slice higher over time, while those confident in US leadership may keep the current home‑bias as an intentional choice.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    43%
  • Large-cap
    36%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    2%

Market cap exposure is anchored in mega and big companies, with only small slivers in mid and small caps. This aligns closely with traditional large‑cap benchmarks and tends to provide more stability and liquidity, since big global firms are usually more resilient and widely followed. The trade‑off is less exposure to the sometimes higher growth (and higher risk) potential of smaller companies. This structure is well‑balanced and matches global standards, which is a strong indicator of thoughtful construction. If a tilt toward smaller companies is desired, that can be added gradually, but for many investors, this large‑cap‑centric mix is a sensible core that keeps risk at a moderate‑high but manageable level.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this mix would likely sit above many traditional balanced portfolios in both expected return and volatility. The Efficient Frontier is a curve showing the best possible risk‑return combinations for a given set of assets. Within just these funds, small shifts among broad US, international, growth‑tilted, and dividend‑tilted slices could slightly adjust the balance between stability and upside. For example, increasing the broad, diversified components and trimming the more concentrated growth segment could move the portfolio toward a more “efficient” risk‑return point without adding new products. Efficiency here simply means getting the most expected return per unit of risk, not necessarily achieving the smoothest ride or the highest income.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 3.80%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.57%

The overall dividend yield of around 1.6% reflects a modern, growth‑leaning equity mix. The dedicated dividend ETF helps lift income, while the growth‑oriented NASDAQ fund pulls the average yield down. Dividends can be attractive for those who like getting regular cash flows, but in a growth‑focused strategy they’re often automatically reinvested to buy more shares, quietly compounding returns in the background. This yield is reasonable for a large‑cap equity portfolio today and aligned with broad benchmarks. If a higher income stream became a priority, the income‑focused slice could be expanded gradually, though that might shift the balance away from pure growth toward more mature, slower‑growing companies.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

The total expense ratio around 0.06% is impressively low and a major strength. Costs are one of the few things an investor can truly control, and even small percentage differences compound significantly over decades. Here, the use of broad, low‑fee index ETFs keeps the drag on returns minimal and aligns well with best practices embraced by many institutional investors. This is a strong foundation for long‑term compounding. The main ongoing task is simply to monitor for any fee changes or unnecessary additions of higher‑cost products. Keeping this simple, low‑cost structure intact should continue supporting better net returns compared with more expensive alternatives.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey