Roast mode 🔥

Single ETF cosplay pretending to be a complex balanced masterpiece

Report created on Jun 3, 2026

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

5/5
Highly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This “portfolio” is really just one ETF in a trench coat trying to look like a full strategy. The risk score and diversification badge make it sound like some carefully engineered mix, but under the hood it’s 100% in one equity fund with zero moving parts. That’s not portfolio construction; that’s clicking “buy” once and calling it a day. The good news is simplicity avoids a lot of self-inflicted wounds. The bad news is all the eggs live in one product, one issuer, one structure. When everything depends on a single vehicle, operational and design choices of that ETF quietly become the whole story.

Growth Info

Historically, this thing did fine but not exactly “genius at work” levels. $1,000 turning into $2,558 since 2019 and a 14.87% CAGR is solid on paper, until it stands next to the US market at 17.52% and quietly shuffles away. Even the global market basically matched or slightly beat it. Max drawdown at -29.76% was a touch worse than both benchmarks too, so the deal here is “slightly less return with slightly more pain.” CAGR is just your smoothed annual growth rate, like average speed on a road trip; this trip wasn’t a disaster, just slower and bumpier than the neighbors’.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection is basically a financial weather forecast run a thousand times, and it’s politely saying “don’t get cocky.” Median 15‑year outcome of $2,817 on $1,000 is okay, but not life‑changing, with a wide middle band from $1,808 to $4,266. The scary edges stretch from nearly flat at $1,056 to lottery‑ticket‑ish $7,935. That spread is the price of being 100% in equities, even in a single bland-looking fund. Simulations use past data and assumptions, so they’re more like a guess based on yesterday’s weather than a prophecy, but the message is clear: this can absolutely disappoint if markets stop being generous.

Asset classes Info

  • US Equity
    65%
  • Stocks
    35%

Asset-class “diversification” here is basically: US equity 65%, everything-else equity 35%, and that’s it. No bonds, no cash buffer, no real ballast — just a fully committed equity ride dressed up with a “Balanced Investors” label. Calling this balanced is like calling a double espresso a relaxing bedtime drink. In normal times, an all‑equity setup can look heroic; in bad crashes, it just looks naked. Asset classes are the big building blocks that control how violently the portfolio behaves, and this one chose the loudest room in the house and stayed there.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    23%
  • Financials
    20%
  • Industrials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Basic Materials
    7%
  • Energy
    7%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Utilities
    3%
  • Real Estate
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector spread looks decent at first glance, but the tilts give away the personality: 23% technology and 20% financials scream “growth plus banks and hope.” Industrials at 12% and energy/materials together at 14% add a cyclical flavor, so this is not a shy, defensive layout. Health care, staples, utilities, and real estate are all background extras instead of main characters. Sector exposure is basically which parts of the economy you’re betting will not implode at the same time. This portfolio leans into economically sensitive areas, so when the cycle turns, it’s more “full body hit” than “gentle wobble.”

Regions Info

  • North America
    71%
  • Europe Developed
    15%
  • Japan
    6%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, this thing is wearing a giant North America hoodie: 71% at home, only 29% sprinkled across the rest of the planet. The “world” allocation is basically Europe 15%, Japan 6%, and then tiny slivers in Asia, Australasia, and Africa/Middle East just to tick boxes. This is classic home‑region comfort zone behavior, which works great right up until local markets lag for a decade and the rest of the world quietly moves on. Geography is just diversified economic risk; here the bet is obvious — North America carries the story, everyone else is minor backup vocals.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    45%
  • Large-cap
    30%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

The market‑cap profile is textbook index‑core: 45% mega‑cap, 30% large‑cap, then 18% mid, 5% small, 1% micro. Translation: this portfolio worships the giants and lets smaller companies exist only as flavoring. That’s fine if the giants keep leading, but it means the so‑called diversification is really “a lot of big names plus some pocket change in the rest.” Market‑cap weighting feels safe because it tracks the crowd, but it also means buying more of whatever is already expensive and huge. When size cycles turn, a setup like this can feel annoyingly slow to react.

True holdings Info

  • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF
    25.46%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
  • Royal Bank of Canada
    1.81%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    1.36%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
  • Toronto Dominion Bank
    1.30%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • Apple Inc
    1.18%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
  • Shopify Inc
    1.07%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • Enbridge Inc
    0.87%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • Microsoft Corporation
    0.81%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
  • Bank of Montreal
    0.78%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce
    0.75%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    • iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite
  • Top 10 total 35.39%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Look‑through holdings scream “default Canadian equity comfort blanket plus US market autopilot.” A quarter of the portfolio routes through a total US stock ETF, and the top single names are the usual Canadian banks, Shopify, Enbridge, plus US mega‑caps like NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Overlap is absolutely happening — those US titans are likely living both inside the US index slice and other global components, but with only top‑10 data, the real duplication is probably worse. This is the illusion of owning many things while repeatedly circling the same handful of giants and local financials.

Risk contribution Info

  • iShares Core Equity Portfolio
    Weight: 100.00%
    100.0%

Risk contribution is hilariously simple: one ETF, 100% of the risk, end of story. Risk contribution tells you which positions are really shaking the portfolio; here, it’s just the one doing all the drama. That makes the theoretical diversification inside the ETF nice, but at the wrapper level there’s zero redundancy. If the ETF’s strategy, index, or provider runs into any issue, the entire portfolio catches the same cold. This is the opposite of position‑level risk control — it’s basically trusting a single black box and hoping it always behaves.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Create your own report?

Join our community!

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey