One global fund to rule them all and hope the future looks like the backtest
Report created on Mar 23, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
SP SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
SPGM - US78463X4759 100.00%
This “portfolio” is technically just one global ETF wearing a fake moustache and calling itself diversified. Everything is outsourced to a single wrapper: one product, one risk engine, one point of failure. It’s like declaring you’re a foodie because you eat at one giant buffet. Simplicity is nice, but this is borderline lazy minimalism. If that ETF gets restructured, badly managed, or quietly drifts in style, the whole ship tilts with it. The takeaway: a one-fund setup can work, but pretending it’s deeply customized or carefully constructed is pure fantasy. It’s a decent base, not a finished masterpiece.
Growth
Historically, the numbers are annoyingly solid for something this simple: about 12.6% CAGR from 2016, turning $1,000 into roughly $3,009. That’s better than the global market proxy but still trailing the US market, which smugly hits about $3,756. Max drawdown around -34% shows it can still punch you in the face during crashes, same as the benchmarks. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is basically your average speed over the whole road trip, potholes included. Past data is yesterday’s weather: it tells you what survived, not what’s guaranteed. Expect future returns to rhyme, not repeat, and be ready for another -30% mood swing at some point.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation basically says, “You’ll probably be fine… unless you’re spectacularly unlucky.” Monte Carlo is just a fancy way of rerunning history with random twists to see many possible futures, like thousands of alternate timelines. Median outcome is strong: about 391% total return in 10 years, with the pessimistic 5th percentile still positive at roughly 75%. 995 out of 1,000 paths ended green, which looks comforting but is built off one regime of historical returns. Translation: good odds, not a promise. Future markets don’t care about your simulations; they’re just stress-tested guesses, not a prophecy carved in stone.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset-class breakdown is hilariously straightforward: 100% stocks, 0% anything else. No bonds, no cash buffer, no real diversifiers – just pure equity rollercoaster. For someone in an allegedly “balanced” risk profile, this is more “balanced on a tightrope without a net.” Stocks are great for long-term growth, but they also don’t care about your need for stability in bad years. When markets puke, everything here goes down in one correlated shrug. General takeaway: a one-asset-class life is simple, but it means your emotional stability needs to be the thing that’s diversified, because the portfolio sure isn’t.
Sectors
- Technology 26%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 13%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 9%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Energy 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector mix leans heavily on technology at about 26%, then financials and industrials trailing behind. It’s not a grotesque single-sector addiction, but tech is clearly the favorite child. This mirrors broad global indexes: lots of growthy, innovation-flavored stuff driving the bus. The risk is simple: if the “future of everything” trade cools off, performance gets dinged faster than you’d like. It isn’t an insane tilt, just obediently following market cap gravity. Takeaway: this isn’t a handcrafted sector bet; it’s letting the current winners decide your exposure, which works until they’re no longer the winners.
Regions
- North America 65%
- Europe Developed 14%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, it’s basically “US and friends.” About 65% in North America and only a modest spread across Europe, Japan, developed Asia, and tiny slices of emerging markets, Latin America, and Africa/Middle East. So yes, it’s “global,” but in that way where global apparently means “mostly America plus decorative side dishes.” The upside: you catch the dominance of US markets when they lead. The downside: if US valuations deflate or underperform for a decade, it’s going to feel like dragging an anchor. It’s a global-ish approach, not true world balance – more empire-centric than planet-based.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 45%
- Large-cap 34%
- Mid-cap 14%
- Small-cap 4%
- Micro-cap 2%
Market cap exposure is unapologetically mega-cap driven: around 45% mega, 34% big, then some crumbs in medium, small, and micro. This is the classic “index has been taken over by giants” problem. You’re not really betting on “the market”; you’re mainly betting on the largest, most expensive kids in the playground. Small and micro are basically a rounding error, so don’t kid yourself about meaningful exposure to under-the-radar growth stories. Takeaway: this setup is stable-ish but heavily reliant on the continued success of giants. If the mega-caps wobble, the whole structure shakes with them.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 4.23%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
AA Apple Inc 3.58%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.74%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.84%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.58%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.57%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.40%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
TS Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 1.35%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.32%
Part of fund(s):- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
-
TS Tesla Inc 1.07%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
- Top 10 total 20.67%
The look-through holdings scream “cap-weighted worship.” NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Broadcom, TSMC, Meta, Tesla – the usual mega-cap celebrity lineup. Hidden concentration is obvious: if the big names tank together, the portfolio catches the flu instantly. Overlap here is just from the top 10 of the ETF, so the concentration is almost certainly worse under the hood. This isn’t some clever contrarian bet; it’s hugging whatever’s already huge and popular. The takeaway: when the same giants run the show across the board, diversification becomes more about counting tickers than genuinely spreading risk.
Factors
Factor exposure shows a weirdly tidy story: dominant momentum and low volatility. Factor exposure is like checking the ingredient list: what traits actually drive returns. Momentum means “what’s been winning keeps winning,” and low volatility means “stuff that doesn’t swing wildly.” Leaning into both is like driving fast but insisting the road be very smooth. It’s not a crazy combo, but it does mean you’re leaning into what’s already worked recently and what’s seen as relatively “safer.” If leadership rotates to beaten-down, high-risk, or deep value areas, this setup can lag and feel very stuck-in-the-last-cycle.
Risk contribution
-
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market
Weight: 100.00% 100.0%
Risk contribution is comically simple: one ETF with 100% weight contributing 100% of risk. Risk contribution measures which holdings actually cause your portfolio’s mood swings, and here the answer is “all of it, from the same place.” There’s no subtlety, no hidden landmines, just one big visible landmine. If the ETF behaves badly or tracks weirdly, there’s nowhere for volatility to hide. The main benefit is clarity: what you see is what shakes you. Still, trimming outsized risk contributors isn’t possible when everything is literally the same holding. You’ve maximized single-risk-channel dependency.
Dividends
- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market 1.90%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.90%
Dividend yield around 1.9% is a gentle pat on the head, not an income machine. This is growth-first, income-second. Dividends here are more like a side salad on a big growth plate, not the main course. If someone expects meaningful cash flow, this setup will feel stingy and heavily dependent on capital gains to do the lifting. On the plus side, lower yield often lines up with more reinvestment into future growth, which is fine for long time horizons. Just don’t pretend this is an income strategy; it’s more “we’ll pay you something so you don’t complain.”
Ongoing product costs
- SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market 0.09%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.09%
Costs are honestly suspiciously good: 0.09% TER is couch-cushion money in fee terms. TER (total expense ratio) is what you pay annually for the fund to exist, like a small subscription fee. Here, you’ve somehow avoided the usual fee traps and landed on something that’s borderline dirt-cheap. Fees are one of the only things in investing you can control, and at this level you’re not lighting cash on fire. You basically outsourced the entire portfolio to one fund and, against the odds, didn’t get fleeced for it. Credit where it’s due: you clicked the right cheap button.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey