A stock heavy factor tilted portfolio with strong growth potential and moderate diversification for long term investors

Report created on Oct 19, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is made up of four equity ETFs, with 60% in a broad total US market fund and 40% in tilts to small cap value and international stocks. This mix leans heavily on one core building block, which keeps things simple and close to common benchmarks, while the other positions add extra flavor and potential return. Having everything in stocks means higher long‑term growth potential but also sharper swings along the way. To increase resilience, someone could consider adding a stabilizing asset type, such as high‑quality bonds or cash, especially if withdrawals are expected in the next five to ten years.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix has delivered a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 19.6%, meaning a notional $10,000 could have grown to around $47,000 over ten years if that rate persisted. That far outpaces what most balanced benchmarks have done, which signals a clear growth tilt. The maximum drawdown of about ‑24% shows that big temporary drops are very possible, though less severe than pure high‑octane strategies. Only 33 days made up 90% of returns, highlighting how a handful of good days drive long‑term results. Staying invested and avoiding market timing is crucial, since missing those few strong days can dramatically reduce long‑term outcomes.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs many random “what if” paths using historical return and volatility patterns, points to a wide but encouraging range of potential outcomes. A 5th percentile outcome of roughly 280% growth and a median of around 1,185% suggest strong upside, while even weaker paths still end above the starting point. The average simulated annual return of about 21.9% reflects the historically rich environment, but that should be treated carefully; simulations are only as good as the past data and assumptions used. It’s important to remember that markets change, so using these numbers as rough guideposts, not promises, is the healthiest mindset.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All investable assets here are in stocks, with 0% in cash, bonds, or alternatives, which is why the portfolio risk score is 4 out of 7 and the diversification score is only 3 out of 5. Being 100% in equities maximizes exposure to global business growth, but it also ties returns tightly to stock market cycles. In severe downturns, there’s no built‑in ballast from more defensive assets. This setup is well‑aligned for long time horizons and strong stomachs but may be uncomfortable near big expenses. One way to smooth the ride would be to phase in a small allocation to lower‑volatility assets as the investment horizon shortens.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    23%
  • Financials
    17%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    13%
  • Industrials
    13%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Energy
    7%
  • Basic Materials
    5%
  • Consumer Staples
    5%
  • Real Estate
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%

Sector exposure is broad and healthy: technology at 23%, financial services 17%, consumer cyclicals and industrials at 13% each, and smaller but meaningful slices in healthcare, communication services, energy, materials, consumer defensive, real estate, and utilities. This mix looks quite similar to global equity benchmarks, which is a solid sign of diversification. A tech tilt can boost returns during innovation cycles but can feel bumpier when interest rates rise or growth stocks fall out of favor. Keeping any one sector below extreme levels and periodically checking that sector weights still match comfort levels can help maintain a risk profile that feels sustainable over time.

Regions Info

  • North America
    82%
  • Europe Developed
    9%
  • Japan
    5%
  • Australasia
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, about 82% is in North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Japan, Australasia, and a small slice in other regions. This US‑heavy stance lines up with many common benchmarks and has been rewarded over the past decade, as US markets outpaced many peers. However, it does create a “home bias,” where results are more dependent on one economy and currency. The international small cap value and developed equity positions are doing useful work by diversifying that risk. Someone wanting even broader global balance could gradually nudge more toward non‑US holdings, especially if they believe leadership may rotate across regions over future cycles.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    30%
  • Large-cap
    22%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    17%
  • Micro-cap
    12%

Market cap exposure is nicely tiered: 30% mega cap, 22% big, 18% medium, 17% small, and 12% micro. Compared to a typical broad market benchmark, this is clearly more tilted toward small and micro companies, especially with the dedicated small cap value funds. That’s a classic “factor tilt,” aiming to capture a size and value premium over long periods. Historically this can boost long‑term returns but may lag the market for long stretches and feel more volatile. This structure is well thought out for patient investors; it just requires accepting that performance may look quite different from headline indices in any given year.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart called the Efficient Frontier, which shows the best possible trade‑off between volatility and return using a given set of assets, this portfolio already sits in a fairly attractive spot. The strong historical return and moderate drawdowns imply that the current mix is quite “efficient” relative to many all‑equity blends. However, small tweaks among the existing funds could, in theory, nudge it slightly closer to the mathematical frontier, perhaps by adjusting the balance between broad market and small cap value tilts. Efficiency here only speaks to risk versus return, not other priorities like simplicity, taxes, or personal comfort with fluctuations.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 3.30%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • BNY Mellon International Equity ETF 2.60%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.57%

The total yield of about 1.57% comes from a mix of modest dividends on US broad market exposure and higher yields on international and small cap value holdings. Dividends are the cash payments companies make from profits, and they can provide a small, steady contribution to total return, especially when reinvested. This yield level is normal for a growth‑focused equity mix and suggests the main engine here is price appreciation rather than income. For someone seeking more current cash flow, a slight shift toward higher‑yielding strategies or mixing in dedicated income‑oriented assets could boost payouts, while recognizing that higher yield can sometimes mean higher risk.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® International Small Cap Value ETF 0.36%
  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • BNY Mellon International Equity ETF 0.04%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.11%

The overall total expense ratio (TER) of roughly 0.11% is impressively low, especially considering the use of more specialized small cap value strategies. Low costs matter because they’re like a permanent headwind or tailwind: every 0.1% saved each year compounds into a meaningful difference over decades. The use of an ultra‑low‑cost core index fund combined with slightly pricier but still reasonable factor ETFs is a smart cost structure, balancing precision and efficiency. Periodically checking that fees remain competitive relative to similar options and that each fund earns its keep in terms of diversification or factor exposure can keep the portfolio cost‑effective.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey