This portfolio has only about 1.9 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

A high growth concentrated portfolio with strong tech focus and meaningful exposure to thematic innovations

Report created on Aug 4, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

3/5
Moderately Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The portfolio is heavily tilted toward a handful of high-growth names, with big positions in a tech-heavy ETF, three large individual growth stocks, a bitcoin ETF, a clean energy ETF, and a broad international fund. Compared with a typical broad-market benchmark, this is much more concentrated and far less diversified, especially given how much weight sits in just a few positions. That concentration can supercharge gains but also magnify losses. To smooth the ride a bit, shifting a slice from single stocks and niche themes into broader, more diversified funds could help anchor the portfolio while still keeping its clear growth orientation intact. This allocation is bold and growthy, but it leans hard on a few big engines.

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio shows a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 28.6%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip: it smooths out all the ups and downs into one yearly growth number. A $10,000 starting investment growing at that rate would have ballooned surprisingly quickly compared with a broad market benchmark, which is typically far lower. The max drawdown of about –28% means there were periods where the portfolio temporarily lost more than a quarter of its value. That’s a big swing but not shocking for a growth profile. It’s important to remember that past performance, especially with concentrated growth holdings, doesn’t guarantee anything about the future.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which ran 1,000 simulated futures based on historical patterns, shows a very wide range of possible outcomes. Monte Carlo is basically a “what if” engine: it scrambles historical return and volatility patterns to see many potential paths forward. The median (50th percentile) scenario ending above 2,000% looks eye‑popping, and even the lower 5th percentile still shows a gain. But this optimism is driven by past high returns and volatility, which may not repeat. Simulations can’t foresee new regulations, shifts in investor sentiment, or major tech cycles. Treat these numbers as rough weather maps, not guarantees, and consider whether comfort with big swings really matches the emotional side of investing.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    85%
  • Other
    15%

Asset‑class wise, the portfolio is 85% in stocks and 15% in “other,” which in this case is mainly the bitcoin ETF. There’s essentially no buffer from bonds or cash‑like instruments. Compared with a classic growth benchmark, this still looks aggressive because of the crypto component and the lack of stabilizing assets. Stocks are great for long‑term growth, but they can be very bumpy in the short term, and adding a volatile “other” asset can amplify that effect. For someone who wants a slightly smoother ride without sacrificing growth, shifting a small slice into more defensive, income‑producing assets could help temper drawdowns while keeping the portfolio growth‑first.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    33%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    29%
  • Utilities
    6%
  • Industrials
    5%
  • Telecommunications
    5%
  • Financials
    2%
  • Health Care
    2%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Energy
    1%

Sector allocation leans heavily on technology and consumer cyclicals, together making up well over half of the portfolio. That’s very different from broad benchmarks, which usually spread more evenly across defensive areas like healthcare, consumer staples, and utilities. Tech‑ and consumer‑focused portfolios can soar when innovation and consumer spending are strong, but they tend to be more sensitive to interest rate spikes, recessions, or risk‑off periods. It’s good that there is at least some exposure to utilities, industrials, and healthcare, which adds a bit of balance. To reduce the risk of one economic narrative dominating results, gradually nudging some exposure toward more steady, less cyclical areas could make returns less tied to a narrow set of stories.

Regions Info

  • North America
    69%
  • Europe Developed
    7%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Asia Developed
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%

Geographically, the portfolio is clearly anchored in North America at about 69%, with the rest spread thinly across Europe, Asia, and other regions through the international ETF. This is actually close to how many global benchmarks look today, since a lot of the world’s largest companies are U.S.-based. That alignment is a positive: it means you’re not wildly offside versus global market weights. Still, a bit more exposure to faster‑growing or less correlated regions could add diversification benefits, especially if U.S. markets cool while other parts of the world pick up. Keeping the broad international fund as a core and, over time, increasing its share slightly would enhance global balance without changing the portfolio’s growth flavor.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    59%
  • Large-cap
    15%
  • Mid-cap
    8%
  • Small-cap
    2%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

By market capitalization, there’s a strong tilt toward mega‑cap names, with meaningful but smaller slices in big, mid, small, and micro caps. Mega caps are the global giants—more stable, widely followed, and often less volatile than smaller companies. This alignment with large caps mirrors major indexes and is a plus for stability within an otherwise aggressive portfolio. The lighter allocation to small and micro caps means less exposure to the very high‑risk, high‑reward part of the market, which might actually be good given the already concentrated themes elsewhere. If more return potential is desired without adding more single‑stock risk, increasing diversified exposure to mid and small caps via broad funds, rather than stock picking, could be a more balanced way to do it.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Open the Portfolio Builder Reshape your holdings and watch every metric recalculate live. Try it

Risk‑return optimization using the Efficient Frontier suggests there might be room to juggle weights within your existing holdings to get a smoother ride for a similar expected return. The Efficient Frontier is basically the curve of best possible trade‑offs between risk and reward using your current ingredients, without adding new ones. Because so much is clustered in correlated growth plays, small shifts—like trimming individual stock concentration in favor of broader funds—could move the portfolio closer to that “efficient” edge. Efficiency here means the best risk‑return ratio, not necessarily perfect diversification or maximum upside. Any changes would be about fine‑tuning, not completely changing the high‑growth character that has driven strong past results.

Dividends Info

  • Apple Inc 0.40%
  • iShares Global Clean Energy ETF 1.50%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.50%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.60%

The total dividend yield of around 0.6% is quite low, which fits a growth‑oriented, capital‑appreciation‑first approach. Dividends are the cash payments some investments make, like a small “thank you” for holding them, and can be crucial for investors needing ongoing income. Here, returns are expected to come mainly from price increases, not income streams. The international ETF is doing most of the dividend heavy lifting. This setup can work very well for long horizons, especially in tax‑advantaged accounts, but it won’t support spending needs in the near term. If predictable income becomes more important over time, gradually blending in some higher‑yield, more mature companies or funds could create a healthier mix between growth and cash flow.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF 0.21%
  • iShares Global Clean Energy ETF 0.41%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.20%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.13%

Costs are impressively low overall, with a total TER (total expense ratio) of about 0.13%. TER is like the annual “membership fee” charged by funds to manage your money. Being well below the typical actively managed portfolio is a big plus because lower fees mean more of the portfolio’s growth stays in your pocket over the years. The clean energy and bitcoin ETFs are on the higher side compared with broad funds, but they’re also more specialized. Keeping those positions sized reasonably helps ensure that slightly higher niche costs don’t drag down overall efficiency. The cost structure here is a genuine strength and supports better long‑term performance, especially if high returns persist.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey