A globally diversified ESG focused balanced portfolio with strong growth tilt and moderate volatility

Report created on Dec 30, 2025

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

5/5
Highly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is built mainly from four broad ESG ETFs, with roughly half in large US companies, one quarter in non‑US stocks, one fifth in smaller US companies, and a small slice in US investment‑grade bonds. Compared with a classic balanced benchmark (often 60% stocks and 40% bonds), this setup is clearly more growth‑oriented, sitting around 93% stocks and 6% bonds. That tilt matters because it increases long‑term return potential but also raises short‑term swings. For someone in a “balanced” band, this sits at the aggressive end, so keeping some flexibility to slowly raise the bond slice over time as goals get closer could help keep the risk level feeling comfortable.

Growth Info

Based on the reported 14.39% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate), a $10,000 investment held over 10 years would have grown to about $38,500, assuming the same pattern continued. CAGR is like the average speed of a car over a long road trip: it smooths out the ups and downs into one clean annual number. Compared with typical balanced portfolios, this return is very strong and reflects the high equity share and the strong last decade for large US stocks. Still, the max drawdown of about -25% shows that big falls are very possible, so it’s useful to ask whether a similar drop would be tolerable emotionally and financially.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 random “what if” paths using historical patterns, points to a median outcome of roughly +284% and an overall average annual return of about 11.2%. Monte Carlo is basically stress‑testing the portfolio in many simulated futures, changing returns and volatility each time. The fact that 982 out of 1,000 paths were positive is encouraging but not a guarantee. The 5th percentile outcome of +33.3% shows a tough but still positive scenario, while the higher percentiles show strong compounding. It’s wise to use these ranges as rough planning guides, not promises, and to keep some margin for life changes and market surprises.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    93%
  • Bonds
    6%
  • Cash
    1%

The split of roughly 93% stocks, 6% bonds, and 1% cash puts this solidly in growth territory, even though it’s labeled “balanced.” Compared with a more classic mix (for example, 60–70% stocks and 30–40% bonds), this setup accepts more volatility for higher expected returns. The small bond slice does add some ballast, especially during equity sell‑offs, but likely won’t fully cushion large stock market declines. For someone who wants to stay in a “balanced” risk range as they age, gradually building the bond share over time—rather than in one big move—can be a way to keep the overall risk score in that comfortable middle band without sacrificing long‑term growth too abruptly.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    27%
  • Financials
    18%
  • Health Care
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Telecommunications
    8%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Real Estate
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Utilities
    1%

Sector exposure is broad, with all major areas represented and none dominating excessively: technology leads at 27%, financials at 18%, then healthcare, industrials, and others rounding things out. This spread is quite close to common global equity benchmarks, just with a moderate tech tilt. Tech‑heavy allocations can benefit strongly in growth periods but tend to be more sensitive when interest rates rise or when markets rotate toward slower‑growth value areas. Overall, the sector mix is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards. Staying aware of how tech and financials drive portfolio swings can help set expectations during policy changes, earnings shocks, or regulatory shifts that affect those areas more directly.

Regions Info

  • North America
    70%
  • Europe Developed
    9%
  • Japan
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    4%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographic exposure is anchored in North America at about 70%, with the rest spread across developed Europe and Asia plus a small allocation to emerging regions. This pattern is quite similar to many global market‑cap benchmarks, which are also heavily US‑tilted. The positive side is alignment with the world’s deepest, most liquid equity market, which has been a strong performer. The trade‑off is some dependence on the US economic and policy cycle. The presence of international holdings, including both developed and emerging economies, meaningfully improves diversification. Keeping this global exposure intact over time can help reduce the risk of any single country or region driving the whole long‑term outcome.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    34%
  • Large-cap
    24%
  • Mid-cap
    13%
  • Small-cap
    12%
  • Micro-cap
    10%

The portfolio spans the full range of company sizes: roughly one third mega‑cap, one quarter large‑cap, and the rest spread across mid, small, and even micro‑cap. This is broader than many traditional index portfolios that lean almost entirely on mega and large companies. Smaller firms often grow faster over long periods but experience sharper swings and can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns or tighter credit conditions. This size mix supports higher growth potential and improves diversification beyond the biggest household names. Still, the small and micro slices can amplify volatility, so it helps to view this as a long‑term position and avoid reacting to short‑term noise, especially in more turbulent market phases.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this portfolio likely sits near, but not exactly on, the Efficient Frontier for its chosen building blocks. The Efficient Frontier is the set of mixes that give the best possible return for each level of volatility using just the existing components. Here, the high equity share boosts expected return but also raises risk compared with many “balanced” mixes. Small shifts—like slightly increasing bonds or adjusting the large‑cap versus small‑cap split—could move it closer to that efficient line without changing the underlying holdings. Efficiency here is about the best risk‑return ratio, not whether the allocation is diversified or values‑aligned, both of which already look strong.

Dividends Info

  • iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF 3.90%
  • Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF 1.00%
  • Vanguard ESG International Stock 3.20%
  • iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF 1.00%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.72%

The total yield of around 1.72% is on the lower side but very much in line with a growth‑tilted, ESG‑screened equity portfolio plus investment‑grade bonds. ESG screens often exclude some higher‑yielding sectors, so yields can be slightly lower than broad market averages. The bond ETF’s yield near 3.9% provides the main income anchor, while the equity ETFs sit near or a bit below typical market yields. For investors who prioritize income, this setup leans more toward growth than cash flow. Reinvesting these dividends automatically can meaningfully boost compounding over time, especially when combined with the strong historic and simulated growth profile seen here.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF 0.10%
  • Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF 0.10%
  • Vanguard ESG International Stock 0.12%
  • iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.12%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.11%

With an overall expense ratio around 0.11%, the costs are impressively low, especially for an ESG‑focused, globally diversified mix. The TER (Total Expense Ratio) is like a small annual “membership fee” that’s quietly deducted from returns; keeping it low adds up significantly over decades. Compared with many actively managed or niche ESG products, this fee level is very competitive and supports better long‑term performance. This cost discipline is a real strength of the portfolio and is well‑aligned with best practices. Periodically checking that no higher‑cost overlapping funds sneak in over time can help preserve this advantage and keep net returns as close as possible to the underlying market performance.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey