This portfolio has only about 1.9 years of historical data, based on the youngest asset in the portfolio. Some metrics, projections, and AI insights may be less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
Roast mode 🔥

A speculative portfolio that thinks diversification is collecting different colors of the same sock

Report created on Aug 28, 2025

Risk profile Info

7/7
Speculative
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

At first glance, this portfolio screams "I love ETFs" but whispers "I don't really know how to use them." With 43% in a Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF and a significant chunk in a BMO All-Equity ETF, it's like putting all your eggs in two baskets and then realizing both baskets are in the same henhouse. The attempt at diversification with a tech-heavy fund and a nod towards emerging markets and Canadian banking is commendable, but it feels like throwing darts blindfolded hoping to hit the bullseye.

Growth Info

Historically, this portfolio's CAGR of 16,266.25% seems like a typo or a dream sequence. If true, we'd all be taking investment advice from you while sipping drinks on your private island. However, with a max drawdown of -26.26%, it's more like a roller coaster ride that's exhilarating until you realize the safety harness is a bit loose. The fact that 90% of returns came from a single day suggests this portfolio is more volatile than a soap opera plotline.

Projection Info

Monte Carlo simulations are the financial world's version of asking a crystal ball about the future. With 488 out of 1,000 simulations returning positive, it's like flipping a slightly biased coin. Unfortunately, with no specific percentiles given, it's as if the crystal ball got foggy. This suggests that while there's a chance of making money, there's also a significant risk of not. Betting on this portfolio is akin to playing financial Russian roulette.

Asset classes Info

  • US Equity
    70%
  • Stocks
    14%

The asset class allocation is like attending a party and only talking to two people the entire night. With 70% in US Equity and 14% in other equities, there's a glaring neglect of bonds, real estate, commodities, or literally anything else. This lack of diversity is like wearing blinders in a field of investment opportunities.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    33%
  • Financials
    21%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    8%
  • Industrials
    7%
  • Health Care
    6%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector allocation is where the portfolio tries to show some character but ends up looking like it has a tech addiction and a finance fetish. With 33% in technology and 21% in financial services, it's like betting on two horses in a race with dozens. The underrepresentation of consumer cyclicals, industrials, and healthcare suggests a myopic view of the economy.

Regions Info

  • North America
    84%
  • Asia Emerging
    6%
  • Europe Developed
    4%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Japan
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, this portfolio has a clear case of home bias, with a whopping 84% in North America. It's as if the rest of the world doesn't exist or isn't worth investing in. This approach might work if you're playing a game of Risk, but in the global economy, it's a missed opportunity for diversification and growth.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    49%
  • Large-cap
    33%
  • Mid-cap
    15%
  • Small-cap
    2%

The market cap allocation is like having a party but only inviting the cool big kids and a few medium ones, ignoring almost everyone else. With 49% in mega-caps and 33% in big caps, it's clear this portfolio prefers the safety of the playground's big swings. However, the minimal exposure to small and micro-caps means missing out on potential growth stories.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

Efficient Frontier optimization is about finding the sweet spot between risk and return, but this portfolio seems to have missed the memo. It's like trying to balance on a seesaw alone; without proper diversification, you're just going up and down with market volatility. This portfolio could use a lesson in balancing its assets to achieve smoother, more consistent returns.

Dividends Info

  • iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco Common Class 2.60%
  • Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund 46.80%
  • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets 2.00%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF 0.70%
  • BMO All-Equity ETF 1.10%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 7.50%

The dividend yield strategy is a mixed bag, with yields ranging from paltry to puzzling. A 46.80% yield on the Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund sounds like a fantasy, while the others hover in more believable territory. This portfolio's approach to dividends is like ordering a salad for health reasons and then drowning it in high-calorie dressing.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Create your own report?

Join our community!

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey