Concentrated all equity portfolio combining global value tilt with strong momentum orientation
Report created on Jun 28, 2026Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
3/5
Positions
-
AV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
AVGV - US0250722164 50.00% -
SP Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
SPMO - US46138E3392 30.00% -
ID Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
IDMO - US46138E2220 20.00%
This portfolio is a focused, all‑equity mix of just three ETFs, with no bonds or cash buffers. Half the allocation goes to a broadly diversified global value fund, while the remaining 50% is split between US and international momentum strategies. That structure means every dollar is exposed to stock market movements, with no lower‑risk assets to dampen swings. A simple line‑up like this is easy to follow and keeps the main drivers of performance clear. The combination of value and momentum styles introduces balance between buying cheaper companies and those with strong recent trends, which can behave differently across market cycles and help spread risk within an equity‑only framework.
Growth
Over the last three years, a hypothetical $1,000 in this portfolio grew to about $2,135, implying a 29.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). CAGR is like average speed on a road trip, smoothing out the bumps to show long‑run pace. This return comfortably exceeded both the US market and global market benchmarks over the same period. The maximum drawdown of about ‑16.6% was slightly milder than the US market’s worst drop, and similar to the global market. Drawdown measures the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, giving a sense of how painful bad patches can feel. Only 29 days accounted for 90% of total returns, underlining how a small number of strong days drove much of the gain.
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection uses past volatility and return patterns to simulate 1,000 different future paths for the portfolio over 15 years. Think of it as running many “what if” scenarios, randomly mixing good and bad years based on history. The median outcome turns $1,000 into about $2,692, with a wide “likely” band from roughly $1,720 to $4,087. The broad possible range — from a slight loss near $950 up to around $7,616 — highlights how uncertain long‑term outcomes can be, even with the same starting portfolio. The average simulated annual return of 7.9% is far lower than recent realized performance, illustrating that exceptional short‑term results may not persist indefinitely.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All of this portfolio sits in stocks, with 0% in bonds, cash, or alternatives. Asset classes are broad buckets like equities, fixed income, and real assets that typically behave differently in changing economic conditions. A 100% equity allocation usually brings higher long‑term growth potential but also larger short‑term swings, because there’s no stabilizing anchor like bonds. Compared with many diversified blends that include fixed income, this mix leans firmly toward growth and market sensitivity. The balanced risk classification and mid‑range risk score reflect that while it’s all equity, it’s spread across many companies and regions through diversified ETFs, which helps avoid relying on any single stock or narrow theme.
Sectors
- Technology 23%
- Financials 22%
- Industrials 16%
- Consumer Discretionary 8%
- Energy 8%
- Basic Materials 6%
- Telecommunications 5%
- Health Care 4%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 1%
Sector exposure is fairly broad, with technology and financials taking the lead but not dominating excessively. Technology at 23% is meaningful, yet not extreme compared to many modern equity portfolios, while financials at 22% and industrials at 16% provide substantial non‑tech ballast. Smaller allocations to consumer areas, energy, materials, telecom, and health care round out the picture. This spread across cyclical and more defensive sectors supports diversification, because different industries can react very differently to interest rates, economic growth, or regulatory changes. The moderate tech tilt combined with sizable exposure to more traditional sectors suggests performance is driven by a mix of innovation‑oriented companies and more established, cash‑generative businesses, rather than just one growth engine.
Regions
- North America 66%
- Europe Developed 17%
- Japan 8%
- Asia Developed 4%
- Asia Emerging 2%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Australasia 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, the portfolio is anchored in North America at 66%, with the rest split across developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, and small slices of emerging regions. Geography matters because economic cycles, currencies, and political environments differ from place to place. Compared with a fully global equity benchmark, this portfolio is clearly US‑tilted but still keeps about a third of exposure overseas. That blend has historically benefited from strong US markets while still capturing returns from other developed economies. The presence of emerging markets, though modest, adds another return driver and risk source. Overall, this allocation is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards, offering meaningful international diversification without drifting far from a US core.
Market capitalization
- Large-cap 35%
- Mega-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 20%
- Small-cap 10%
- Micro-cap 5%
The market‑cap mix spans the full spectrum, from mega‑caps down to micro‑caps. About 65% sits in mega and large companies, which are typically more established, widely analyzed, and often less volatile than smaller firms. The remaining 35% in mid, small, and micro‑caps introduces more growth potential but also greater price swings and company‑specific risk. Market capitalization — essentially a company’s size — can shape how sensitive a portfolio is to economic shocks and liquidity conditions. This blend slightly tilts toward bigger names but leaves a meaningful role for smaller stocks, which means overall risk is moderated by large caps while still benefiting from the dynamism and return dispersion found lower down the size spectrum.
True holdings
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 3.92%
Part of fund(s):- American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
- Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 2.46%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.96%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
LR Lam Research Corp 1.57%
Part of fund(s):- American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
- Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.36%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
XO Exxon Mobil Corp 1.32%
Part of fund(s):- American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
- Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
JN Johnson & Johnson 1.22%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.17%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.08%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
-
IN Intel Corporation 0.90%
Part of fund(s):- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
- Top 10 total 16.96%
Looking through the ETFs into their top holdings, a handful of companies appear with noticeable combined weights, such as Micron, NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Alphabet. Overlap across funds means these names can quietly become important drivers of performance, even when no single ETF looks concentrated at the surface. Hidden concentration shows up when the same stock appears in multiple products, amplifying its influence on returns and risk. Here, several large technology and semiconductor names stand out, reflecting both the value and momentum tilts. Coverage only includes ETF top‑10 positions, so overall overlap is likely understated, but the available data already shows that a modest cluster of influential stocks sits underneath the otherwise diversified fund lineup.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows clear tilts toward value and momentum, with other factors broadly around market‑like levels. Factors are characteristics like cheapness (value) or recent strong performance (momentum) that research links to long‑run return patterns, like underlying “flavors” of investing. A high value score suggests a preference for companies trading at lower prices relative to fundamentals, which can help when expensive growth names lag. The high momentum tilt points to holdings that have performed well recently, which can continue to do well in trending markets but may struggle when leadership suddenly rotates. The combination of value and momentum is notable: these styles often behave differently across cycles, so using both can diversify the sources of return within the equity sleeve.
Risk contribution
-
Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
Weight: 50.00% 44.8% -
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
Weight: 30.00% 35.4% -
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
Weight: 20.00% 19.8%
Risk contribution analysis shows how much each ETF drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from simple weights. The global value fund is 50% of the portfolio but contributes slightly less risk at about 45%, reflecting its broad diversification. The US momentum ETF, at 30% weight, contributes roughly 35% of risk, showing it is a relatively punchy position compared with its size; its risk/weight ratio above 1 flags its outsized influence. The international momentum ETF’s risk share is closely aligned with its allocation. Overall, there is no single runaway source of volatility, but the two momentum funds together account for more than half the total risk, indicating that style is a key driver of the portfolio’s variability.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The efficient frontier analysis suggests the current portfolio is already on or very close to the optimal curve for these three holdings. The efficient frontier is the set of portfolios offering the best expected return for each level of risk, using different weightings of the same ingredients. The current mix has a Sharpe ratio of 1.41, meaning its return per unit of risk is strong relative to a 4% risk‑free rate. There is a theoretical weighting that offers a higher Sharpe, but it also comes with higher volatility. Since the current point sits near the frontier, the existing allocation uses these funds in an efficient way from a risk/return perspective, without obvious dead weight among the chosen ETFs.
Dividends
- Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF 1.60%
- Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 3.70%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.70%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.75%
The portfolio’s overall dividend yield is about 1.75%, coming from a blend of lower‑yielding momentum funds and the slightly higher‑yielding international sleeve. Dividend yield is the annual cash payout as a percentage of the investment, like interest from stocks. Here, most of the return story is about price movement and factor exposure rather than income. The international momentum ETF’s 3.7% yield stands out as a more income‑oriented component, while the US momentum fund sits at a modest 0.7%. This kind of profile is typical for growth‑ and trend‑oriented strategies, where companies often reinvest profits instead of paying them out, making dividends a secondary, but still additive, part of total return.
Ongoing product costs
- Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF 0.26%
- Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF 0.25%
- Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.22%
Total ongoing fund costs, measured by the weighted average Total Expense Ratio (TER), are about 0.22% per year. TER is like a management fee taken inside the ETF, quietly reducing returns a little each year. In the context of active and factor‑based strategies, this level is impressively low, supporting better long‑term performance compared with higher‑fee alternatives. The cheapest piece is the US momentum fund at 0.13%, while the global value and international momentum funds are slightly higher but still moderate. Because fees compound over time, keeping costs in this range can make a noticeable difference in long‑run outcomes, especially when combined with a simple structure that avoids extra layers of charges.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey