A growth oriented stock only portfolio with strong US tilt and notable tech concentration

Report created on Sep 17, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is a focused four‑ETF setup with 100% in stocks, leaning heavily on a broad US index, plus dedicated slices to semiconductors, international stocks, and US small cap value. Compared with a typical “growth” benchmark, it’s slightly more concentrated in US markets and in one high‑octane industry, but still earns a strong diversification score. Structure matters because it drives how the portfolio behaves in different markets and how bumpy the ride feels. Keeping the simple core‑satellite idea works well here: keeping most money in broad, low‑cost funds while using smaller “tilts” to express views, and periodically checking if those tilts still match your comfort with risk and volatility.

Growth Info

Using a simple illustration, a $10,000 investment growing at an 18.98% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) would have multiplied several times over the past decade. CAGR is just the “average speed” of growth per year, smoothing out ups and downs, like averaging your speed on a long road trip. That’s a strong result and lines up with the heavy exposure to large US companies and tech, which have led in recent years. The max drawdown of about ‑34% shows the flip side: big drops during stress periods are very possible. It’s worth remembering that historical performance is backward‑looking and can’t guarantee similar returns going forward.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo results show a very wide spread of potential outcomes, from roughly breaking even in real terms at the low end to more than a ten‑bagger at the median and higher at the 67th percentile. Monte Carlo simulation works by taking historical patterns of returns and volatility, then “rolling the dice” thousands of times to see many possible futures. It’s useful to frame expectations and stress‑test plans, but it still leans on past data and assumptions that may not repeat. With such a growth‑heavy mix, the range of possible outcomes is naturally broad, so it can help to focus on planning for both weaker and stronger paths.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

All assets here are in stocks, with no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. That makes the portfolio very growth‑oriented and typically more volatile than a mix that includes steadier assets. Stocks historically have offered higher long‑term returns than bonds, but they also tend to fall harder in market downturns, which can test patience and discipline. Many broad benchmarks for “balanced” investors include meaningful bond exposure, while growth‑tilted benchmarks still often hold some stabilizing assets. Running a quick mental check on your time horizon, job stability, and emergency savings can help decide whether a 100% equity allocation still fits your ability to ride out big market swings.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    40%
  • Financials
    13%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    10%
  • Industrials
    8%
  • Telecommunications
    7%
  • Health Care
    7%
  • Consumer Staples
    4%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is well diversified on paper, covering all major areas, but with a clear tilt: about 40% sits in technology‑related businesses, plus meaningful stakes in financials, consumer, industrials, and communications. This tech‑heavy stance has been a tailwind in the last decade, especially with semiconductors, but it can be more sensitive when interest rates rise or when growth expectations cool. Many popular benchmarks have high tech weights too, so this setup isn’t unusual, just a bit extra tilted. This sector balance is broadly aligned with modern equity markets, which is encouraging, but it’s useful to occasionally check whether that much reliance on one fast‑moving area still feels comfortable.

Regions Info

  • North America
    83%
  • Europe Developed
    7%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographic exposure is strongly anchored in North America at about 83%, with modest allocations to Europe, developed Asia, and small slices of emerging regions. That’s reasonably close to how global equity benchmarks look today, although this portfolio leans even more toward the US than a pure world market index. A US tilt has helped over the past decade, thanks to strong large‑cap and tech performance. At the same time, home‑country bias can mean missing out if other regions lead in future cycles. This allocation is well‑balanced and broadly aligned with global standards, but revisiting how much non‑US exposure feels right can help manage long‑term diversification and currency risk.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    41%
  • Large-cap
    33%
  • Mid-cap
    14%
  • Small-cap
    6%
  • Micro-cap
    5%

The spread across company sizes is nicely tiered: heavy exposure to mega and big caps, with useful slices of mid, small, and even micro caps. Market capitalization just means how big a company is in dollar terms; large firms tend to be more stable, while smaller ones can be more volatile but sometimes faster‑growing. Many standard benchmarks are dominated by mega and big caps, so the added small‑cap value piece here introduces an intentional tilt toward more cyclical, potentially higher‑return but bumpier companies. This blend is consistent with a growth profile, and it’s a positive sign that exposure isn’t locked only into the very largest names.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this mix likely sits on or close to the Efficient Frontier for a 100% stock universe. The Efficient Frontier is just the set of portfolios that offer the highest expected return for each level of risk, assuming only the current building blocks and different weightings among them. Efficiency here doesn’t mean “perfect” or “safest,” only the best trade‑off between volatility and expected return, given these ETFs. Within this all‑equity set, minor shifts between broad US, international, tech, and small‑cap tilts might slightly smooth the ride or tweak expected returns, but the biggest changes in comfort would mainly come from adding or removing non‑stock assets.

Dividends Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 1.60%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.27%

The overall dividend yield of about 1.27% is modest, which fits a growth‑focused equity portfolio. Yield just measures how much cash income you get each year as a percentage of your investment; here, most of the expected return is from price growth, not dividends. The international fund slightly boosts income, while the semiconductor ETF pulls yield down, reflecting its emphasis on fast‑growing, reinvestment‑heavy companies. For long‑horizon investors who are still building wealth, a lower yield can be fine, especially when dividends are automatically reinvested. Those wanting more steady income might typically pair this kind of growth mix with higher‑yielding assets elsewhere, rather than altering the core growth orientation.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Avantis® U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 0.25%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.10%

With a total expense ratio around 0.10%, this portfolio is impressively low cost. The expense ratio (or TER) is like a small annual “membership fee” charged by funds; keeping it low means more of the return stays in your pocket. The ultra‑cheap broad index ETFs anchor costs very effectively, and even the more specialized funds are priced reasonably for what they offer. Over decades, trimming even a few tenths of a percent in fees can add thousands of dollars to outcomes due to compounding. The cost structure here is a real strength and fully in line with best practices for long‑term investing, supporting better net performance over time.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey