A growth oriented portfolio with strong tech tilt and solid global diversification but elevated concentration risk

Report created on Aug 1, 2024

Risk profile Info

5/7
Growth
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

This portfolio is heavily tilted to stocks, with 100% in equities and no cash or bonds. Around half sits in broad index ETFs and the other half in three individual companies, with one tech name taking a very large slice. Compared with a typical global stock benchmark, this setup is more concentrated and more aggressive. That matters because concentration in a few holdings can drive both bigger gains and steeper drops. Keeping the broad ETFs as the core is a big positive. To dial in risk, you could slowly trim oversized single-stock weights over time and recycle that into the broad funds instead of adding new concentrated positions.

Growth Info

Historically, the portfolio has been a rocket ship: a 30.5% CAGR (compound annual growth rate) means $10,000 would’ve grown to roughly $130,000 over 10 years if that rate persisted, which is far above typical stock benchmarks. The flip side is the -48% max drawdown, meaning at one point the portfolio nearly halved in value. That combo—very high return and very large drops—is classic high-growth, high-risk behavior. Past performance doesn’t guarantee similar future results, especially when driven by a few standout stocks. It could help to stress-test your comfort with a 40–50% drop and consider position sizing that you can realistically hold through a major downturn.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo analysis, which runs 1,000 “what if” scenarios by shuffling and reusing historical return patterns, shows extremely strong median and upper-end outcomes, with most simulations finishing far above the starting value. An annualized 38% average in the simulations looks amazing but is almost certainly unsustainable over long horizons because it leans heavily on recent tech-driven strength. Monte Carlo uses the past as raw material, so if the last few years were unusually good, projections can look overly optimistic. It may be smarter to mentally plan for much lower returns and treat the simulation as a “best case skewed by history” rather than a base expectation.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    100%

With 100% in stocks and zero allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives, this setup is fully committed to growth. Many broad benchmarks include some defensive assets, which usually soften the ride when markets fall. Being all-equity can work well for long time horizons but often feels brutal during recessions or sharp corrections. The current stock-only structure is very coherent for a growth profile, and the diversification score confirms there’s decent spread inside equities. If the goal ever shifts toward capital preservation or smoother returns, gradually introducing a small slice of lower-volatility assets could help reduce drawdowns without derailing the long-term growth focus.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    48%
  • Health Care
    21%
  • Financials
    9%
  • Industrials
    5%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    5%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Consumer Staples
    3%
  • Basic Materials
    2%
  • Energy
    2%
  • Utilities
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

Sector-wise, the portfolio is strongly tilted to technology at 48%, with healthcare a distant second at 21%, and the remaining sectors holding modest shares. Compared with common benchmarks, this is clearly tech-heavy, meaning results will be very sensitive to what happens in growth and innovation themes. Tech often leads in bull markets but can drop sharply when interest rates rise or sentiment turns. The good news: you do have exposure to multiple other sectors, which supports the “broadly diversified” rating. To smooth sector risk, adding more to diversified funds instead of additional tech-leaning single names can keep growth potential while avoiding further concentration in any one industry.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    2%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%

Geographically, about 81% of the portfolio is tied to North America, with the rest spread across developed Europe, Asia, and a small slice in emerging markets. This is very close to what many global benchmarks look like today, since U.S. companies dominate world market value. That alignment with global norms is a real strength; it means your regional exposure is broadly in line with how global equity markets are structured. The international ETF helps avoid a “home only” bias. If you ever want to lean more into global diversification, directing new contributions to the international fund rather than U.S.-focused holdings would be a simple way to nudge the regional mix.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    60%
  • Large-cap
    31%
  • Mid-cap
    8%

The portfolio is dominated by mega and big companies, with roughly 91% in the largest firms and just a small slice in mid caps, and essentially nothing in small caps. Large-cap stocks tend to be more stable than tiny companies, but they can still be volatile, especially in growth sectors. The strong large-cap bias brings your structure very close to major global benchmarks, which is helpful for predictability. However, it also means you might miss some of the small-cap premium that can appear over decades. If you ever want to add another return driver, a modest tilt to broadly diversified smaller companies—via funds, not single names—could add another diversification layer.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk–return basis, the portfolio likely sits above a typical “average risk” investor because of its concentration in a few growth stocks. The efficient frontier is a concept that shows the best possible trade-off between risk and return for a given set of assets, purely by changing how much you hold of each. Based only on your current positions, shifting more weight from the concentrated single stocks into the broad ETFs would usually move you closer to that “efficient” line—similar expected returns with somewhat less volatility. Efficiency here doesn’t mean perfect diversification or lower risk overall; it simply means getting the most expected return per unit of risk you choose to take.

Dividends Info

  • Johnson & Johnson 2.50%
  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 1.10%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.29%

The overall dividend yield of about 1.3% is on the low side, which fits a growth-tilted equity portfolio. Dividends are the cash payments some companies make to shareholders; they can provide a steady income component that smooths total return. Here, the bulk of expected return is likely to come from price appreciation, especially from high-growth holdings that reinvest profits instead of paying large dividends. That’s perfectly aligned with a growth profile, not an income-focused one. If at some point regular cash flow becomes important, you could gradually favor broad funds and companies with more stable, higher yields while being careful not to sacrifice diversification or overreach for yield.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 0.10%
  • Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.04%

Costs look excellent: expense ratios of 0.10% and 0.07% on the ETFs, and an overall TER of around 0.04%, are impressively low. Fees are like friction on a wheel—small yearly percentages compound over decades and can quietly eat a big chunk of returns. Your cost structure is well below what many investors pay and clearly supports better long-term performance. Keeping the bulk of assets in low-cost, broad funds is a major strength. As you make changes in the future, it can be worth checking that any new fund or product keeps total costs in a similar low range to preserve this advantage.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey