Globally diversified stock portfolio with a strong semiconductor tilt and efficient risk return profile
Report created on Mar 22, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 80.00% -
SE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
SEC0 - IE000I8KRLL9 20.00%
The structure is very straightforward: 100% in stocks via just two ETFs. Around 80% sits in a broad global equity fund, giving exposure to thousands of companies worldwide. The remaining 20% is in a focused global semiconductor ETF, which creates a clear thematic tilt toward chips and related technology. Having everything in accumulation share classes means earnings are reinvested automatically, which is handy for long-term compounding. The big positive here is simplicity plus broad diversification, with one deliberate high‑growth theme layered on top. The trade‑off is that portfolio ups and downs will closely follow global stock markets, with extra sensitivity to the semiconductor cycle.
Growth
From August 2021 to March 2026, €1,000 grew to about €1,680, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.46%. CAGR is like your average speed on a road trip, smoothing out all the bumps along the way. This sits nicely between the global market (8.66% CAGR) and the very strong US market (19.72% CAGR), which has been unusually hot. The maximum drawdown of -24% shows the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, deeper than the US but similar to the global market. The fact that 90% of returns came in just 18 days underlines how missing a few big up days can hurt results, so staying invested has been important here.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation projects thousands of possible futures based on how the portfolio behaved in the past. Think of it as rerunning history with the same “weather patterns” but different sequences of sunny and stormy days. After 10 years, the median outcome (50th percentile) is a total return of about 619%, with the 5th percentile at 87% and 67th percentile near 982%. That wide spread shows high uncertainty: outcomes vary a lot even with the same average assumptions. The fact that 991 out of 1,000 simulations end positive is encouraging, but it still can’t predict crashes or regime shifts. Past data is a guide, not a guarantee, so it helps for planning but shouldn’t be treated as a promise.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
The allocation is 100% in stocks, with no bonds, cash, or alternatives showing up in the mix. That’s a clear, growth‑oriented stance. Equities historically deliver higher long‑term returns than safer assets, but they also bring bigger drawdowns and more emotional swings. Many “balanced” or classic retirement portfolios hold a substantial slice of bonds to dampen volatility; here, that stabilizing role is absent. For someone with decades ahead and a strong stomach for swings, this all‑equity setup can be very reasonable. For shorter horizons or lower risk tolerance, adding some defensive assets outside this core equity block might help align overall household risk better.
Sectors
- Technology 42%
- Financials 14%
- Industrials 9%
- Consumer Discretionary 8%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Health Care 7%
- Consumer Staples 4%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector allocation is clearly tilted: about 42% in technology, with meaningful slices in financials, industrials, consumer cyclicals, communication services, and healthcare. Smaller allocations go to consumer defensive, materials, energy, utilities, and real estate. Compared with typical global equity benchmarks, this is noticeably more tech‑heavy because of the dedicated semiconductor ETF plus tech leaders inside the global fund. Tech‑rich portfolios tend to do very well when innovation and growth are rewarded, but they can be sensitive to interest rate rises, regulation, and cyclical slowdowns. The flip side is relatively lower exposure to slower‑moving defensive sectors that sometimes cushion market downturns.
Regions
- North America 63%
- Europe Developed 14%
- Asia Developed 8%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, about 63% sits in North America, 14% in developed Europe, 8% in developed Asia, 6% in Japan, and roughly 8% spread across emerging markets, Australasia, Latin America, and Africa/Middle East. This is quite close to global market weights, where the US also dominates. That alignment with broad world equity benchmarks is a real strength: it reduces the risk of making big regional “bets” and means results should roughly track the global economy over time. The emerging exposure is modest but present, adding some growth optionality without dominating risk. Currency movements will still matter, but no single non‑US region looks dangerously overweight.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 49%
- Large-cap 35%
- Mid-cap 15%
- Small-cap 1%
By market cap, about 49% is in mega‑caps, 35% in large caps (“big”), 15% in mid caps, and only 1% in small caps. That’s very similar to typical global index construction, which is heavily skewed toward the world’s biggest companies. The benefit is stability and liquidity: these giants tend to have stronger balance sheets, global footprints, and better information flow. The trade‑off is less exposure to the higher‑risk, higher‑potential small‑cap universe, which can outperform in some periods. This large‑cap orientation fits well with an investor who prefers smoother execution and less idiosyncratic single‑stock risk, even if it sacrifices some possible small‑cap upside.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 5.09%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AA Apple Inc 3.12%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AV Broadcom Inc 2.67%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.63%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 2.62%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.89%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.62%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.51%
Part of fund(s):- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
AS ASML Holding N.V. 1.51%
Part of fund(s):- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.32%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 23.97%
Looking through the ETFs, the biggest underlying exposures are NVIDIA, Apple, Broadcom, Microsoft, TSMC, Amazon, Alphabet, Micron, and ASML. These are all large, globally dominant tech or semiconductor names, which explains a chunk of the growth and volatility. There is also “hidden” concentration because the same stocks appear in both the world ETF and the semiconductor ETF, especially NVIDIA and other chip leaders. Since only top‑10 ETF holdings are captured, actual overlap is likely higher. This kind of overlap is not necessarily bad, but it means the portfolio is more sensitive to the fortunes of a relatively small group of mega‑cap tech and chip giants than the headline two‑fund structure might suggest.
Factors
Factor exposure data shows a strong tilt to momentum (60%) and a meaningful size tilt (20%), with limited signal coverage overall. Factor investing looks at traits like value, size, momentum, quality, low volatility, and yield that have historically driven returns. A momentum tilt means the portfolio leans into stocks that have done well recently, which tends to help when trends persist but can hurt sharply when leadership suddenly rotates. The size tilt suggests a bit more exposure to smaller companies than a perfectly neutral market‑cap weight, adding some growth potential and volatility. With low average signal coverage, these readings are best seen as directional hints, not precise diagnostics.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 80.00% 67.1% -
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
Weight: 20.00% 32.9%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding actually drives overall volatility, which can differ from simple weights. Here, the broad world ETF is 80% of the portfolio but contributes about 67% of the risk. The semiconductor ETF is only 20% by weight yet contributes around 33% of total risk, with a risk‑to‑weight ratio of 1.65. That means this small thematic slice pulls more than its weight in driving ups and downs, which fits its concentrated and cyclical nature. This is not inherently problematic, but it’s important to be intentional: the 20% chips position is effectively a high‑octane lever on global tech, not just a minor side bet.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current mix has an expected return of 12.19% with 16.22% volatility, giving a Sharpe ratio of 0.63. The Sharpe ratio is a simple way of measuring return per unit of risk, like how many kilometres you get per litre of fuel. The portfolio lies on the efficient frontier, which means for its specific two holdings the weights are already used efficiently. However, the “optimal” point on that frontier, with the highest Sharpe ratio (0.79), runs hotter at 29.12% risk for 23.97% expected return. The minimum‑variance mix drops risk to 13.90% but also lowers return. So current weights strike a solid middle‑ground: efficient and reasonably balanced between risk and reward.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc 0.35%
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.22%
Total ongoing costs (TER) for the portfolio sit around 0.22%, combining roughly 0.19% for the world ETF and 0.35% for the semiconductor ETF. That is impressively low and well below the average cost of many active funds or retail products. Fees are like friction: they don’t matter much in any single year, but they compound against you over decades. Keeping costs under control is one of the few things investors can reliably influence, and this portfolio does that very well. Over a long horizon, saving even half a percent per year can mean many thousands more in end wealth, so this is a clear structural strength.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey