A broadly diversified equity portfolio with strong growth tilt and modest dividend support

Report created on Sep 8, 2024

Risk profile Info

4/7
Balanced
Less risk More risk

Diversification profile Info

4/5
Broadly Diversified
Less diversification More diversification

Positions

The structure is a straightforward, all‑equity mix: roughly half in a broad US total market fund, one fifth in a NASDAQ‑100 tracker, one fifth in international stocks, and a smaller slice in US dividend payers. This lands near a classic “balanced growth” equity mix, but with extra emphasis on growth companies. That structure matters because broad index funds help spread risk across thousands of stocks, while a growth tilt can boost long‑term potential but also bump up volatility. To keep risk aligned with a balanced profile, it could help to periodically check if the NASDAQ and dividend slices are still at intended weights and rebalance when they drift.

Growth Info

Historically, this mix has delivered a very strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 14.3%. CAGR is like the average yearly speed of a road trip, smoothing out the bumps along the way. A $10,000 starting amount compounding at that rate for 10 years would hypothetically grow to around $38,000, versus roughly $26,000 at 10% per year. The flip side is a maximum drawdown of around –26%, which means at one point the value fell about a quarter from a prior peak. That’s actually quite reasonable for an all‑equity mix, but it still tests nerves. As always, past performance can’t guarantee similar future results.

Projection Info

The forward projection using Monte Carlo analysis shows a wide range of potential outcomes. Monte Carlo is basically a big “what if” machine: it scrambles and re‑samples historical returns 1,000 times to see many possible futures. In these simulations, the median scenario ends at about 466% of the starting value, with a pessimistic 5th percentile still near 89% and a very optimistic 67th percentile over 670%. Almost all runs were positive, and the average simulated annual return sits around 14.7%. These numbers look great, but they rely heavily on past patterns. It’s smart to treat them as rough weather forecasts, not as promises.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Cash
    1%

Almost everything here is in stocks, with about 99% equity and a token 1% in cash. That is highly growth‑oriented and well aligned with a long time horizon but can feel bumpy in sharp market drops. A typical “balanced” benchmark would usually mix in a sizable chunk of bonds or other defensive assets, which dampen swings. The upside of your stock‑heavy design is higher long‑term upside potential; the downside is steeper short‑term losses during bear markets. If stability or shorter‑term spending needs become more important, it could be helpful to explore adding a small safety cushion, like more cash‑like or defensive holdings, while keeping the core equity structure intact.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    32%
  • Financials
    12%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    11%
  • Telecommunications
    10%
  • Industrials
    9%
  • Health Care
    9%
  • Consumer Staples
    6%
  • Energy
    4%
  • Basic Materials
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Real Estate
    2%

Sector exposure is broad, with all major areas represented, which is a strong sign of diversification. There is a notable tilt toward technology at about 32%, well above what many broad benchmarks carry, plus healthy representation in financials, consumer sectors, communications, and industrials. That tech and growth tilt has been a big tailwind over the past decade, helping drive strong returns. The flip side is that tech‑heavy portfolios can swing more when interest rates jump or when growth expectations cool. This composition is still nicely diversified and matches many modern “growth‑with‑balance” blends, but it’s worth checking once in a while that the tech share hasn’t crept beyond your comfort zone.

Regions Info

  • North America
    81%
  • Europe Developed
    8%
  • Asia Emerging
    3%
  • Japan
    3%
  • Asia Developed
    3%
  • Australasia
    1%
  • Africa/Middle East
    1%
  • Latin America
    1%

Geographically, the mix is clearly US‑centric, with about 81% in North America and roughly 19% spread across Europe, Asia, and other regions. That home‑country tilt lines up with many US investors and has been rewarded recently, as US markets have outperformed many international peers. The international slice still adds useful diversification, because different regions can lead or lag at different times. Common global benchmarks often allocate somewhat more outside the US, so this setup leans slightly more domestic than “world market weight.” That’s not inherently bad, but it’s helpful to be sure the US tilt is intentional rather than just default.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    40%
  • Large-cap
    34%
  • Mid-cap
    18%
  • Small-cap
    5%
  • Micro-cap
    1%

By market capitalization, the portfolio is anchored in large companies: about 40% mega‑cap and 34% big‑cap, with moderate exposure to medium‑sized companies and a small slice of small and micro caps. Market cap just means the total value of a company’s shares; mega‑caps are the giants everyone knows, while small caps are the scrappy up‑and‑comers. This large‑cap bias keeps volatility more manageable and aligns well with mainstream benchmarks. The bit of smaller‑company exposure is helpful, because those stocks can add extra growth over long stretches, even though they can be jumpier. This mix looks well‑balanced for someone wanting broad exposure with only a modest tilt toward smaller names.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On a risk‑return chart, this mix sits in a spot that looks quite efficient for an all‑equity portfolio, especially given the strong historical performance and moderate drawdowns. The “Efficient Frontier” is a curve showing the best possible trade‑off between risk and return using only the chosen building blocks. Here, shifting a bit between broad market, growth, international, and dividend sleeves could slightly tweak that balance, but the current point already appears close to an attractive risk‑return trade‑off. It’s important to remember that “efficient” just means the best ratio of expected return to volatility; it doesn’t automatically account for personal goals, spending needs, or comfort with big swings.

Dividends Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 2.80%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 1.10%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 2.70%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 1.47%

The blended dividend yield of around 1.5% reflects a growth‑leaning equity mix with a helpful, but not dominant, income component. Dividend yield is just the yearly cash payout divided by price, like getting a small “rent check” from your investments. The dedicated dividend ETF plus the international fund push yield higher than a pure growth portfolio would deliver, while the NASDAQ‑heavy slice brings it down a bit. This setup fits someone more focused on long‑term growth than on immediate income, yet still wanting some cash flow. For investors closer to living off their portfolio, gradually shifting toward a higher overall yield could be one way to support spending without relying entirely on selling shares.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF 0.15%
  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF 0.06%
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.06%

The overall cost level is excellent, with a total expense ratio (TER) around 0.06%. TER is the annual fee charged by funds, similar to a small maintenance cost. Keeping fees this low is a big deal over decades: even a difference of 0.3–0.5 percentage points per year can compound into a significant gap in ending wealth. Your lineup leans heavily on low‑cost index ETFs, which is exactly what many evidence‑based strategies favor. From a cost perspective, this portfolio is already in a very strong spot. The main ongoing task is just to monitor expense ratios occasionally and favor similarly low‑cost options if any changes are made.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey