Highly concentrated technology growth portfolio with strong momentum tilt and significant single stock exposure

Report created on Mar 24, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

The portfolio is dominated by a single technology ETF at about two‑thirds of assets, plus another large chunk in a broad US index ETF and a sizeable direct position in one high‑flying stock. Smaller slices go to other growth and momentum funds, a few individual tech names, a tiny international fund, and very small positions in gold, silver, and bitcoin. This kind of structure puts growth stocks front and center while leaving everything else as seasoning. When one theme or stock cluster drives most of the value, outcomes tend to swing more dramatically. Anyone using a setup like this should treat it as an aggressive growth sleeve rather than a balanced, all‑weather core.

Growth Info

Over the short history shown, the portfolio turned 1,000 into about 1,710, beating both the US and global market references, which ended around 1,409–1,410. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~28% is far higher than the ~17% for the benchmarks, showing how a focused growth tilt can turbocharge returns when conditions are favorable. Max drawdown, at roughly -27%, is also deeper than the reference markets’ -17% to -19%, which is exactly what you’d expect from a concentrated, growth‑heavy mix. This period has been unusually friendly to tech and momentum; past performance over such a short window is fragile and may look very different in a harsher environment.

Projection Info

The Monte Carlo projection simulates many possible 10‑year paths using the portfolio’s recent return and volatility profile, then shows a range of outcomes. It’s like running 1,000 “what if” futures where markets wiggle differently each time but follow similar patterns to history. The results here are extremely optimistic, with very high median and upper‑percentile outcomes and no simulated negative final values. That reflects the unusually strong recent run of the holdings more than a guaranteed future. Simulations are only as realistic as the assumptions they feed on; if markets revert to more normal returns or hit a long tech downturn, real‑world results could come in far below these numbers.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    99%
  • Other
    1%

Almost the entire portfolio is in stocks, with only about 1% in “other” assets like precious metals and crypto. That makes this a near‑pure equity growth play, with minimal ballast from traditionally steadier assets. High equity weights can drive strong long‑term growth but usually mean larger swings during market corrections or recessions. Compared to more balanced mixes that might blend in bonds or cash‑like instruments, this setup leans heavily into risk assets. For someone seeking smoother rides or nearer‑term spending needs, a structure like this would typically be paired with a separate, more defensive pool of capital rather than relied on as the sole investment bucket.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    84%
  • Telecommunications
    3%
  • Financials
    3%
  • Industrials
    2%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    2%
  • Health Care
    2%
  • Consumer Staples
    1%
  • Energy
    1%
  • Utilities
    1%

Sector exposure is dominated by technology at roughly 84%, with the remaining sectors each holding only low single‑digit slices. That’s a much stronger tech tilt than broad market benchmarks, where technology is important but not overwhelming. Such heavy concentration benefits from innovation cycles, digital transformation, and enthusiasm around AI or software, but it also becomes highly sensitive to changes in interest rates, regulation, and investor sentiment toward growth. When tech falls out of favor, there aren’t many counterweights here to soften the blow. This sector setup is powerful if the theme continues to lead, but it is not designed for resilience across different economic backdrops.

Regions Info

  • North America
    97%
  • Asia Emerging
    1%
  • Europe Developed
    1%

Geographically, exposure is almost entirely in North America, at about 97%, with only tiny positions in developed Europe and emerging Asia. That’s a strong home‑market tilt compared with global benchmarks, where non‑US regions take up a much larger share. Relying so heavily on a single region ties portfolio fortunes closely to that economy’s policy, currency, and corporate landscape. While North American markets have led in recent years, leadership often rotates over longer periods. Someone comfortable with this tilt is effectively betting that domestic large growth companies will continue to dominate, while accepting that they’re less cushioned if other regions outperform.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    57%
  • Large-cap
    24%
  • Mid-cap
    11%
  • Small-cap
    6%
  • Micro-cap
    2%

Most of the portfolio sits in mega and big companies, together around 81%, with smaller slices in mid, small, and micro caps. That structure lines up with many cap‑weighted indices, which naturally favor the largest companies. Large caps tend to have more established businesses and better access to capital, which can offer some relative stability, but here they are still growth‑heavy and volatile. The modest exposure to smaller caps adds a bit of extra return potential and risk without dominating behavior. Overall, the size mix is reasonably aligned with broad market norms; it’s the sector and stock‑specific concentration that really drive the aggressive profile, not the market‑cap breakdown.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    24.04%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 10.52%
  • Apple Inc
    11.63%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Microsoft Corporation
    7.75%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Broadcom Inc
    4.47%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 0.86%
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.94%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    Direct holding 0.21%
  • Palantir Technologies Inc.
    1.28%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Cisco Systems Inc
    1.25%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
    1.22%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Applied Materials Inc
    1.12%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Lam Research Corp
    1.11%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Invesco QQQ Trust
    • Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 55.79%

Looking through the ETFs, a handful of companies dominate overall exposure, with NVIDIA at about 24%, Apple around 12%, and Microsoft near 8% of the total portfolio. Several chip and hardware names cluster just above 1% each, and there’s overlap where the same stocks appear both directly and via multiple funds. That overlap creates hidden concentration: if one of these giants stumbles, the impact can hit several holdings at once. Because the data only uses ETF top‑10 holdings, true overlap is likely even higher. When a few names become “everywhere you look,” it can be worth asking whether that level of reliance on specific companies matches the desired risk level.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Low
Data availability: 16%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
Very low
Data availability: 14%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Low
Data availability: 100%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
Very high
Data availability: 13%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
Low
Data availability: 13%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Low
Data availability: 100%

Factor exposure shows strong tilts toward quality, low volatility, and momentum, with some influence from value and yield. Factors are like underlying “traits” that help explain how and why investments move: momentum leans into recent winners, quality emphasizes stronger balance sheets, and low volatility favors stocks that historically swing less. Here, the dominance of momentum suggests the portfolio may do very well in strong, trending markets but could suffer sharp reversals when previous winners fall out of favor. At the same time, the quality and low‑volatility tilts provide a small buffer compared with pure high‑beta growth. Average signal coverage is moderate, so these readings are helpful but not precise blueprints of future behavior.

Risk contribution Info

  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 66.05%
    65.6%
  • NVIDIA Corporation
    Weight: 10.52%
    18.5%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    Weight: 13.68%
    7.9%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    Weight: 2.99%
    2.3%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust
    Weight: 1.99%
    1.6%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 95.9%

Risk contribution measures how much each holding drives overall ups and downs, which can differ a lot from just looking at weights. The tech ETF at about 66% weight contributes roughly 66% of total risk, while the single NVIDIA position at just over 10% weight drives more than 18% of risk. Together with the S&P 500 ETF, the top three positions contribute almost 92% of portfolio risk. That means the rest of the holdings barely move the needle in terms of overall volatility. When one stock has a risk‑to‑weight ratio notably above 1, like NVIDIA does here, trimming that exposure is one common way investors reduce single‑name shock risk without changing the broad strategy.

Redundant positions Info

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Invesco QQQ Trust
    Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
    High correlation

Several core holdings — the tech ETF, S&P 500 ETF, QQQ, momentum ETF, and large‑cap growth ETF — move very similarly, or are “highly correlated.” Correlation just means how often assets go up and down together; when it’s high, they tend to boom and drop at the same time. High correlation across major positions limits diversification benefits, since owning multiple funds that behave alike doesn’t smooth the ride much during downturns. In strong tech‑led rallies, this alignment can feel great because everything rises in sync. But in a broad growth selloff, shocks can propagate through the entire portfolio quickly, leaving little shelter inside the current lineup.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier, which is the curve showing the best expected return for each risk level using these same ingredients. The Sharpe ratio — a simple measure of return per unit of volatility — is noticeably lower for the current mix than for both the optimal and minimum‑variance portfolios. That suggests there’s room to improve the tradeoff simply by reweighting existing holdings, not by adding new ones. Interestingly, the optimal Sharpe portfolio here has both higher expected return and lower risk than the current setup. For someone comfortable with the underlying assets but open to tweaks, exploring weight changes could make the ride more efficient without changing the core growth story.

Dividends Info

  • Broadcom Inc 0.60%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C 0.30%
  • Micron Technology Inc 0.10%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.50%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.40%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.80%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 0.60%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.40%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.20%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.00%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.50%

Income from dividends is low, with an overall yield around 0.5%. A few holdings, including the broad market ETFs and some individual stocks, pay modest dividends, but most of the value here is driven by price appreciation rather than regular cash payouts. That’s typical for growth‑oriented tech portfolios, where companies often reinvest profits rather than distributing them. For someone seeking income to cover spending needs, this kind of yield would usually be considered supplemental at best. As a growth engine inside a broader plan that includes separate income sources, a low‑yield equity sleeve like this can still play a useful role, as long as expectations about cash flow are clear.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • SPDR Gold Mini Shares 0.10%
  • iShares Bitcoin Trust 0.12%
  • Invesco QQQ Trust 0.20%
  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF 0.04%
  • iShares Silver Trust 0.50%
  • Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF 0.13%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.08%

The portfolio’s total expense ratio, around 0.08%, is impressively low given the strong tilt toward specialized growth and momentum funds. The largest ETFs are especially cost‑efficient, with fees well below many active funds or thematic products. Keeping costs down is powerful over time, because every basis point saved stays invested and compounds. Even in a high‑return portfolio, unnecessary fees can quietly erode a chunk of gains over long horizons. Here, the fee structure is a clear strength and aligns well with best practices. If adjustments are made in the future, maintaining this low‑cost mindset will help preserve more of whatever returns the market delivers.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey