One fund to rule them all and not quite match the actual market
Report created on Apr 8, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
Positions
-
GE L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
GERD - IE0001UQQ933 100.00%
This “portfolio” is basically a monogamous relationship with one ETF. No side quests no supporting cast just 100% in a single multifactor equity fund. It’s clean and simple but also a bit like putting your entire diet in the hands of one giant mystery smoothie. Sure it says it’s diversified inside but if that recipe ever goes out of fashion your whole account is along for the ride. The general lesson: simplicity is great until it quietly turns into single-point-of-failure risk. A second or third uncorrelated holding could spread the behavioral and provider risk without making things messy.
Growth
Historically this thing has done… fine-ish. €1,000 turning into €1,431 in under three years is solid, with a 13.6% CAGR (compound annual growth rate: your average “speed” over the trip). But the US and global markets both did slightly better, and they did it while also dropping harder in crashes. So you paid for a multifactor smart-sounding strategy and basically got “almost the market but a bit slower and slightly less dramatic.” Past data is yesterday’s weather though: useful, not prophetic. The takeaway: if you’re going to deviate from vanilla index land, the bar for long-term outperformance needs to be higher than “close enough.”
Projection
The Monte Carlo projection — basically 1,000 parallel-universe reruns of the next 15 years — paints a picture that’s optimistic but not fantasy-level. Median outcome: €1,000 grows to about €2,833, with a wide “could be okay could be spicy” range between roughly €1,071 and €8,026. That’s the market politely reminding you it does whatever it wants. A 75% chance of a positive outcome is decent, but 1-in-4 simulations end flat or worse. Translation: this setup is built for patience, not glory. Anyone expecting a straight line up from a 100% equity fund labeled “cautious” is kidding themselves.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset allocation is as subtle as a brick: 100% stocks, 0% everything else. For something tagged “Cautious Investors” with a 3/7 risk score, this is almost comedic. No bonds, no cash buffer, no diversifiers — just pure equity volatility in a nice academic wrapper. It’s like calling a roller coaster “introductory thrill ride” because the safety bar is well designed. The general takeaway: if someone wants real downside cushioning, mixing in other asset classes matters. A single all-stock ETF can still be sensible long term, but it’s not emotionally conservative when the next -30% stretch shows up.
Sectors
- Technology 20%
- Financials 19%
- Industrials 13%
- Telecommunications 9%
- Health Care 9%
- Consumer Discretionary 8%
- Basic Materials 6%
- Energy 5%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector spread is actually one of the more grown-up parts here. Tech at 20% and financials at 19% is tilted but not full “tech-bro YOLO.” Industrials, telecoms, health care, consumer areas, even boring utilities and real estate all get at least a cameo. This looks like a systematic “we own most of the economy” approach instead of a trendy theme-of-the-month circus. The catch: even with this balance, when global equities tank they usually do it together — diversified pain is still pain. But credit where due: this is a sensible sector mix for someone who doesn’t want to bet on a single future.
Regions
- North America 49%
- Europe Developed 22%
- Asia Emerging 9%
- Asia Developed 7%
- Japan 6%
- Africa/Middle East 3%
- Australasia 2%
- Latin America 2%
- Europe Emerging 1%
Geographically, this screams “I like global capitalism but still think in English.” Roughly half in North America, about a fifth in developed Europe, and the rest sprinkled across Asia, Japan, and the smaller regions. That’s surprisingly sane for a one-ETF setup and not wildly different from global equity market weights. No region is absurdly oversized beyond the typical North America bias you see almost everywhere. The nice part: you’re not hostage to one economy, one currency, or one political circus. The less nice part: in a big global downturn, “well diversified” just means you get hit from more directions at once.
Market capitalization
- Large-cap 34%
- Mega-cap 32%
- Mid-cap 25%
- Small-cap 7%
- Micro-cap 1%
Market cap mix is decently spread: 32% mega-cap, 34% large, 25% mid, and a token 8% in small/micro caps. This is basically a “slightly adventurous adult” version of a standard index: still driven by giants like Microsoft and Apple, but with some smaller names sprinkled in so you can say you’re diversified at dinner parties. The small and micro slice is too small to move the needle much — it’s more garnish than strategy. Overall this is not a crazy tilt toward any size bucket, which is both good (sensible) and mildly boring if you thought “multifactor” meant something radically different.
True holdings
-
DT Deutsche Telekom AG 1.13%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.11%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
MU Micron Technology Inc 1.03%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 0.94%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
AA Apple Inc 0.91%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
V Visa Inc. Class A 0.86%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
MA Mastercard Inc 0.86%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 0.85%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 0.77%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
-
LL Eli Lilly and Company 0.74%
Part of fund(s):- L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
- Top 10 total 9.19%
Looking through the top holdings, the usual mega names pop up: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Eli Lilly, Visa, etc. So beneath the fancy “multifactor” label, a lot of the glamour is still driven by the same global giants everyone owns. Overlap is only shown for the top 10, so real duplication is almost certainly higher. That means this isn’t some quirky hidden-gem factory; it’s a dressed-up way of overweighting big familiar names with some factor seasoning. Hidden concentration here isn’t about one stock blowing you up, but about being more similar to broad indexes than the marketing would suggest.
Risk contribution
-
L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating EUR
Weight: 100.00% 100.0%
Risk contribution is hilariously simple: one ETF, 100% of the risk, end of story. The tool even politely tells you the top three holdings contribute 100% of portfolio risk, which is what happens when there is literally just one holding. The lesson here is more philosophical: provider risk and strategy risk are massively concentrated. If this one fund underperforms or the provider stumbles, there’s nowhere else in the portfolio to pick up the slack. Trimming risk here doesn’t mean selling a single rogue stock; it means deciding whether one fund should really be the entire show.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey