High octane tech focused growth portfolio with strong historical returns and concentrated risk

Report created on Mar 27, 2026

Risk profile

  • Secure
    Speculative

The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.

Diversification profile

  • Focused
    Diversified

The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.

Positions

The portfolio is almost entirely growth-oriented equities with a very clear tilt toward technology and innovation themes. Around a third sits in a broad tech index, another large slice in the S&P 500, and the rest in focused satellites like semiconductors, Korea, uranium, space, defense, and a small slice of Bitcoin. This makes it a “core plus satellites” setup, but with the satellites heavily skewed to aggressive themes instead of stabilizers. That structure can supercharge returns in favorable markets but also amplifies swings when sentiment turns. As a general guide, this kind of build is best matched with a long time horizon and a stomach for big ups and downs.

Growth Info

Over the measured period, $1,000 grew to about $1,578, translating into a 23.12% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). CAGR is like average cruising speed on a long road trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. This easily beats both the U.S. market and global market, which were around 16% per year. The trade-off is a max drawdown of -23.55%, meaning the portfolio temporarily fell almost a quarter from a peak. That’s deeper than the benchmarks. The pattern fits a high-growth style: excellent upside when conditions are favorable, but with sharper pullbacks that require emotional discipline during corrections.

Asset classes Info

  • Stocks
    97%
  • Crypto
    3%

Almost all of this portfolio is in equities, with just a small slice in crypto and essentially nothing in bonds or cash-like stabilizers. That lines up neatly with a growth classification and a risk score on the higher side. Equities are the main long-term wealth builder, but they can drop sharply in bear markets, and a portfolio this stock-heavy will feel every hit. This allocation is well-balanced for someone who prioritizes growth over capital stability and is comfortable riding out large drawdowns. Anyone wanting smoother ride or nearer-term spending goals would typically pair growth assets with some defensive holdings to damp volatility and provide dry powder.

Sectors Info

  • Technology
    55%
  • Industrials
    12%
  • Financials
    7%
  • Consumer Discretionary
    5%
  • Health Care
    4%
  • Telecommunications
    4%
  • Energy
    3%
  • Utilities
    2%
  • Consumer Staples
    2%
  • Basic Materials
    1%
  • Real Estate
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Sector-wise, technology dominates at more than half the equity exposure, with the rest spread across industrials, financials, consumer areas, health care, and others. This is a much heavier tech tilt than broad market indices, and it’s further reinforced by focused plays like semiconductors and innovation strategies. Tech-heavy portfolios tend to do very well in periods of low interest rates, strong earnings growth, and enthusiastic risk appetite, but they can be hit hard when rates rise or growth expectations cool. The positive side is clear participation in leading-edge trends; the trade-off is higher sector-specific risk if sentiment turns against high-growth companies.

Regions Info

  • North America
    79%
  • Asia Developed
    9%
  • Europe Developed
    4%
  • Asia Emerging
    2%
  • Japan
    1%
  • Australasia
    1%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Geographically, the portfolio is anchored in North America, with a modest allocation to developed Asia, some exposure to Europe, and a focused position in South Korea. This kind of U.S.-centric stance has historically lined up well with global equity leadership, and it broadly resembles many common benchmarks that lean toward the U.S. However, it does mean outcomes are closely tied to North American economic conditions and policy moves. The dedicated South Korea exposure brings in a distinct set of opportunities and risks, often tied to technology and export cycles. For people seeking smoother global diversification, a more even regional split can help reduce reliance on any single economy.

Market capitalization Info

  • Mega-cap
    41%
  • Large-cap
    29%
  • Mid-cap
    17%
  • Small-cap
    8%
  • Micro-cap
    2%

This breakdown covers the equity portion of your portfolio only.

Market-cap exposure is skewed toward mega and large caps, which together form about 70% of the equity slice, with meaningful but smaller allocations to mid, small, and micro caps. Larger companies typically bring more established business models and slightly lower volatility, while smaller names add growth potential and sharper swings. This blend keeps the portfolio anchored in the global corporate “blue chips” while still tapping into the higher-risk, higher-reward segment of the market. The structure is quite sensible for growth investors: it keeps the engine of big, liquid companies as the core while letting the smaller-cap exposure introduce extra performance torque, especially in strong economic expansions.

True holdings Info

  • NVIDIA Corporation
    9.02%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
  • Apple Inc
    6.69%
    Part of fund(s):
    • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
  • Microsoft Corporation
    4.45%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
  • Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC)
    3.22%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares Bitcoin Trust
  • Broadcom Inc
    2.58%
    Part of fund(s):
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
    1.53%
    Part of fund(s):
    • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
  • SK Hynix Inc
    1.36%
    Part of fund(s):
    • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
    • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
  • Micron Technology Inc
    1.28%
    Part of fund(s):
    • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
    1.27%
    Part of fund(s):
    • ARK Innovation ETF
    • ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Lam Research Corp
    0.99%
    Part of fund(s):
    • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
    • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
  • Top 10 total 32.39%

Looking through the ETFs, there’s notable concentration in a few mega-cap tech names. NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, and Broadcom alone make up a meaningful chunk of effective exposure via multiple funds. This overlap is “hidden” concentration: it doesn’t show up as single-stock positions, but their business fortunes still heavily influence outcomes. For example, a big earnings miss from a top name can ripple through several holdings at once. While this has helped during the recent tech boom, it ties performance strongly to a narrow leadership group. Periodically checking how much effective weight sits in the top five to ten underlying companies is a helpful risk-awareness habit.

Factors Info

Value
Preference for undervalued stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 14%
Size
Exposure to smaller companies
High
Data availability: 21%
Momentum
Exposure to recently outperforming stocks
Neutral
Data availability: 100%
Quality
Preference for financially healthy companies
No data
Data availability: 0%
Yield
Preference for dividend-paying stocks
No data
Data availability: 0%
Low Volatility
Preference for stable, lower-risk stocks
Low
Data availability: 97%

The factor profile shows dominant tilts to size, value, and momentum. Factor exposure is like understanding which personality traits drive returns: size captures smaller companies, value focuses on cheaper stocks, and momentum favors recent winners. A strong size tilt means more sensitivity to smaller, often more cyclical businesses; value can help when markets rotate away from expensive growth names; and momentum tends to shine in strong, trending markets but can suffer in abrupt reversals. Coverage for value and size signals is partial, so these readings aren’t perfect, but they do suggest a blend of classic factors rather than being purely “growth at any price,” which can improve resilience across different market regimes.

Risk contribution Info

  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
    Weight: 33.75%
    38.1%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
    Weight: 19.01%
    13.2%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF
    Weight: 8.01%
    12.4%
  • ARK Innovation ETF
    Weight: 4.56%
    7.3%
  • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
    Weight: 6.53%
    6.3%
  • Top 5 risk contribution 77.3%

Risk contribution shows how much each holding drives the portfolio’s ups and downs, which can differ from simple weights. The tech index fund, semiconductor ETF, and S&P 500 core together account for nearly two-thirds of total risk, even though they are not two-thirds of the weight. That tells you where the real action is. The semiconductor and innovation ETFs in particular punch above their weight, with risk/weight ratios well above one, meaning they add more volatility than their size suggests. If the goal is to dial risk up or down without changing holdings, focusing on these high-risk-contribution positions is the most effective lever for smoothing or amplifying the ride.

Risk vs. return

This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.

Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.

On the risk–return chart, the current portfolio sits below the efficient frontier and well behind the optimal Sharpe ratio. Sharpe ratio compares excess return to volatility, like a “miles per gallon” for risk. Your setup has strong raw returns but lower efficiency than what could be achieved by just reweighting the existing holdings. The optimal mix on the frontier offers higher expected return with lower risk, and even the minimum-variance mix keeps a solid return at much smoother volatility. This suggests there is room to improve the trade-off without changing the ingredients—only their proportions—especially by moderating the highest-risk contributors relative to the more broadly diversified core.

Dividends Info

  • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF 1.20%
  • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF 1.70%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.50%
  • VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF 2.40%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.30%
  • Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares 1.90%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 1.20%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 3.00%
  • Weighted yield (per year) 0.84%

The overall dividend yield is quite low at 0.84%, with most of the heavy allocations sitting in low- or no-yield growth strategies. Yield simply measures how much cash you get back each year from dividends, as a percentage of the portfolio’s value. Many high-growth companies reinvest profits rather than paying them out, which aligns with a capital appreciation focus rather than income. This setup works well when the main objective is long-term wealth building, not funding current spending. For someone wanting more regular cash flow, a higher-yield allocation or a separate income bucket would usually be considered, but for pure growth goals the low yield is not a negative.

Ongoing product costs Info

  • ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF 0.75%
  • American Century ETF Trust - Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF 0.15%
  • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF 0.59%
  • iShares Bitcoin Trust 0.12%
  • iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF 0.40%
  • VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF 0.61%
  • VanEck Semiconductor ETF 0.35%
  • Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
  • Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares 0.10%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 0.03%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.05%
  • ARK Innovation ETF 0.75%
  • Weighted costs total (per year) 0.22%

The blended total expense ratio (TER) of 0.22% is impressively low given the number of specialized and thematic funds involved. TER is the annual fee charged by a fund, and keeping this number small compounds into meaningful savings over long periods. The use of broad Vanguard index funds as core holdings is a strong cost-control choice, offsetting the higher fees of ARK and some thematic ETFs. This balance between low-cost core and selectively more expensive satellites is a solid best practice. As you add or adjust funds in the future, using cost as a tiebreaker between similar exposures helps keep more of the portfolio’s returns in your pocket.

What next?

Ready to invest in this portfolio?

Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.

Select broker

Create your own report?

Analyze your portfolio

Join our community!

Join Discord

The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.

Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.

Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.

Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.

By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.

Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.

Help us improve Insightfolio

Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey