Globally diversified equity portfolio with strong low volatility tilt and efficient risk return balance
Report created on May 6, 2024Risk profile
4/7
Diversification profile
4/5
Positions
-
VW Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 85.00% -
IU iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
IUSN - IE00BF4RFH31 15.00%
The structure is refreshingly simple: two broad equity ETFs, roughly 85% in a global all‑world fund and 15% in global small caps. This gives near full global stock market coverage with a modest tilt toward smaller companies. A concentrated product lineup like this is easy to understand and maintain, which reduces behavioral mistakes like tinkering too often. With 100% in stocks and no bonds or cash, the ride will be bumpy at times, but growth potential is strong. The main takeaway is that this is a clean, globally diversified equity core that suits people who can handle meaningful ups and downs in pursuit of higher long‑term returns.
Growth
From mid‑2019 to early 2026, €1,000 grew to about €1,930, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.25%. CAGR is like your average speed on a long road trip, smoothing out bumps along the way. The portfolio slightly lagged the global market and more noticeably the US market, which has been unusually strong in this period. Max drawdown — the worst peak‑to‑trough fall — was about -34.4%, broadly in line with major benchmarks. That’s normal for a fully equity portfolio. Past performance can’t predict the future, but this history shows the mix has delivered solid growth while behaving similarly to broad markets in tough periods.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All of the capital sits in stocks, with no allocation to bonds, cash, or alternatives. That’s why the “balanced” label feels more about the style of diversification within equities rather than a classic 60/40 stock‑bond split. A 100% equity allocation typically suits investors with long horizons who can tolerate large swings, including drawdowns of 30–50% in severe bear markets. The advantage is higher expected returns over decades compared with mixing in lower‑risk assets. The trade‑off is that there’s no built‑in stabilizer when markets drop, so anyone using this setup usually relies on an emergency cash buffer outside the portfolio.
Sectors
- Technology 24%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 13%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Health Care 9%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 5%
- Energy 4%
- Real Estate 3%
- Utilities 3%
Sector exposure is broadly in line with global equity benchmarks, with technology the largest at about 24%, followed by financials and industrials. This mirrors how the modern global economy is structured and is a strong indicator of healthy diversification. A tech weight in this range is much more balanced than a heavy tech‑only portfolio, so while there’s participation in growth themes, risk is spread across many economic drivers. One thing to keep in mind is that tech and growth‑oriented sectors can be more sensitive to interest rates. Still, the overall sector mix is well‑balanced and aligns closely with global standards.
Regions
- North America 63%
- Europe Developed 15%
- Japan 7%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, around 63% is in North America, 15% in developed Europe, with the rest spread across Japan, other developed Asia, and emerging regions. This is very similar to many global indices, which are naturally dominated by the largest and most developed markets. That alignment is beneficial because it gives exposure to global growth while avoiding big country bets. The smaller but meaningful allocation to emerging and non‑US markets adds diversification if leadership changes away from the US in the future. Overall, the regional mix is broadly diversified and firmly in line with how the world equity market is actually composed.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 41%
- Large-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 19%
- Small-cap 8%
- Micro-cap 2%
The market‑cap breakdown shows 41% in mega caps and 30% in large caps, but also a healthy 19% mid cap, 8% small cap, and 2% micro cap exposure. This is more size‑diversified than a typical large‑cap‑only portfolio, thanks to the dedicated small‑cap ETF. Smaller companies tend to be more volatile but can offer higher long‑term growth, while mega caps are usually more stable and dominant in their industries. This blend smooths out extremes and avoids relying solely on one end of the size spectrum. It’s a nice balance that brings in the small‑cap return potential without overwhelming the overall risk profile.
True holdings
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.59%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AA Apple Inc 3.33%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.52%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.74%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.57%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.34%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.28%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.27%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
ME Meta Platforms Inc. 1.22%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
TS Tesla Inc 0.98%
Part of fund(s):- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 18.84%
Looking through the ETFs, the largest underlying positions are familiar global giants like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Taiwan Semiconductor. These names appear via multiple funds, which creates some hidden concentration in a handful of mega‑cap growth companies, even though you don’t hold them directly. Because only top‑10 ETF holdings are used, the real overlap across the full portfolios is likely higher. This isn’t necessarily a problem: many broad global indices are dominated by these firms. The main implication is that portfolio outcomes are partly tied to how a small group of very large companies performs over time.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows a high tilt to value and a very strong tilt to low volatility, with other factors near neutral. Factors are characteristics like “cheap vs. expensive” (value) or “stable vs. jumpy” (low volatility) that research links to long‑term returns and risk. A strong low‑volatility tilt means the holdings, on average, have historically bounced around less than the market. That can soften drawdowns and make the ride psychologically easier, though it may lag in roaring bull markets led by high‑risk names. The value tilt leans toward reasonably priced companies, which can help when expensive growth stocks fall out of favor.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 85.00% 83.4% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR
Weight: 15.00% 16.6%
Risk contribution measures how much each holding adds to total ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the Vanguard all‑world ETF is 85% of the portfolio and contributes about 83% of the risk, while the small‑cap ETF at 15% contributes about 17% of the risk. The near one‑to‑one match suggests no hidden risk hotspots; each ETF’s contribution is broadly proportional to its size. The small‑cap sleeve, as expected, is slightly riskier per unit of weight, but not dramatically. This balanced risk distribution means the portfolio behaves much like a single global equity fund with a modest small‑cap enhancer on top.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
On the risk–return chart, the current allocation sits effectively on the efficient frontier, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.55 versus 0.64 for the optimal mix using the same holdings. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk — higher means better risk‑adjusted performance. Because the optimal and minimum‑variance portfolios are the same and very close to the current one, there’s little to be gained from elaborate reweighting. Within this two‑fund universe, the existing blend is already highly efficient for its risk level. Any future tweaks are more likely to be about personal comfort with volatility than about squeezing out big efficiency improvements.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) EUR 0.35%
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.21%
The overall ongoing cost (TER) of about 0.21% per year is impressively low for such broad global coverage. TER, or Total Expense Ratio, is like a small annual service fee embedded in the fund price. Lower costs mean more of the portfolio’s returns stay in your pocket, especially when compounded over decades. Relative to many actively managed funds that might charge 1% or more, this fee level is very cost‑efficient. Keeping costs this low is a quiet but powerful advantage, particularly when markets are volatile or returns are modest. From a cost perspective, the setup strongly supports better long‑term performance.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey